ATT_5_PROPOSAL_SUBMISSION_PACKAGE.rtf

NATIONAL PARKS OF BOSTON

Solicitation 140P2119R0027

REHABILITATE SECURITY SYSTEMS AT THE NATIONAL PARKS OF BOSTON

BOST 180322

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

(RFP)

Proposal Submission Package

BOSTON NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK (BOST)

BOSTON AFRICAN AMERICAN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE (BOAF)

BOSTON HARBOR ISLANDS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA (BOHA)

For Technical Volume I:

Experience Questionnaire Past Performance Questionnaire

For Business & Price Volume II:

EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS: The offeror shall provide experience information for up to three (3) substantially complete projects performed by the prime contractor with in the last (5) five years which are proposed to be similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities. The offeror may elect to use this form or a different format that includes the same information identified in the Experience Questionnaire.

Contractor Information:

Company Name Company Street Address Address City City State State Zip Code

XXXXX

DUNS Number

XXXXXXX

Point of Contact Name, Email, Phone

Contract Information:

Project Title Title Contract Number

XXXXXXXXXX

Contract Type Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other Awarded Contract Price

$X,XXX,XXX

Current / Final Price

$X,XXX,XXX

Contract Award Date

XX/XX/XXXX

Contract Completion Date

XX/XX/XXXX

Period of Performance

XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX

Project Location Park or Street address, City, State Client / Owner Company

SELF-PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

Percentage of Work Self-Performed

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:

SCOPE OF OFFEROR’S WORK:

SCOPE OF SUBCONTRACTED WORK:

PERFORMANCE REMARKS:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS: The offeror shall complete the Past Performance Questionnaire included in the Proposal Submission Package in accordance with the instructions in Section L. The offeror shall fill out Sections A and B and coordinate completion of Sections D and C with the respective reference. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be included in the offeror’s proposal. Past Performance Questionnaires shall not be directly sent to the agency.

Company Name Company Street Address Address City City State State Zip Code

XXXXX

DUNS Number

XXXXXXX

Point of Contact Name, Email, Phone

Contract Information

Project Title Title Contract Number

XXXXXXXXXX

Contract Type Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other Awarded Contract Price

$X,XXX,XXX

Current / Final Price

$X,XXX,XXX

Contract Award Date

XX/XX/XXXX

Contract Completion Date

XX/XX/XXXX

Period of Performance

XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX

Project Location Park or Street address, City, State Client / Owner Company Brief description of the contract & work effort:

Scope of work description

Reference:

Name First, Last Position / Title Title Organization Agency or Company Phone Number

XXX-XXX-XXXX

Email Address Email Signature Signature Date

XX/XX/XXXX

Evaluation

Rating Definition Exceptional Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Evaluation Area Rating Quality

Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)?

Quality of and adherence to quality control plan?

Quality of informational and technical submittals?

Overall Quality Rating

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management)

Met project schedule milestones?

Responded to owner requests in a timely manner?

Informational and technical submittals submitted timely?

Promptly addressed scheduling issues?

Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs?

Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications?

Submitted accurate and complete invoices?

Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers?

Overall Cost Control Rating

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

General oversight by project manager and superintendent?

Coordination with and control of subcontractors?

Avoidance of accidents & safety violations?

Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)?

Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives?

Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems?

Overall Management Rating

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)

Met regulatory and contractual labor standards?

Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses?

Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans?

Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Met building and life safety codes?

Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating

Overall Recommendation:

Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts:

Overall Comments:

PROPOSED EQUALS

In accordance with Provision 52.211-06 (Section L), the following products are being proposed as equals. Provide all attachments required by the provision, as applicable. Use additional sheets of paper as necessary.

Section No.

Paragraph No.

Product/Model No.

Proposed Product/Model No.

A. By submitting the proposed equal, the contractor certifies that it:

1. Has investigated the proposed item and determined that it is equal or superior in all respects to that specified.

2. Will provide, as a minimum, the same warranties for the proposed item as for the item specified.

3. Has determined that the proposed item is compatible with interfacing items.

4. Will coordinate the installation of an approved item and make all changes required in other elements of the work because of the substitution.

5. Waives all claims for additional expenses that may be incurred as a result of the substitution.

B. The Contractor is encouraged to submit for approval products that exceed accessibility standards, are sustainable and/or made from recycled or environmentally responsible material. Every effort will be made to approve these materials.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IDENTIFICATION LISTING

In accordance with Clause 52.223-3, Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data, of the Contract, contractor is required to identify any hazardous materials that will be delivered under this contract.

List below all known hazardous materials to be used in performance of the work and submit with the proposal/bid. If material components are unknown at the time of submission, respond with a statement to that effect.