Floyd_Bennett_Field_Manhole_Investigation_20161220.pdf
PDF 10 MB Posted
- Attached to
- GATE 201185 - Replace Primary Electric Cables, Floyd Bennett Field, Gateway National Recreation Area
- Solicitation number
- 140P2018R0017
About this file
Manhole Investigation Report
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Jamaica Bay Unit of Gateway National Recreational Area
Manhole Investigation at Floyd Bennett Field
National Park Service
Manhole Investigation Report Draft
December 20, 2016
NPS Contract No. P15PC00008 Task Order No. P16PD03809
Jamaica Bay Unit of Gateway National Recreational Area – Floyd Bennett Field Manhole i
Contents Introduction
Investigation
Findings
Appendix A - Floyd Bennett Field Primary Electrical Cables Plan View
Appendix B - Areas of Concern
Appendix C - Manhole Observations
Introduction Floyd Bennett Field, a historic district of approximately 1,400 acres, is the primary year-round center for park operations in the Jamaica Bay Unit of Gateway National Recreation Area. The
Jamaica Bay Unit encompasses about 18,560 acres in southern Brooklyn and Queens and contains the largest contiguous area of open space in New York City. Public use of Floyd Bennett
Field is estimated to be about one million visits per year.
The existing primary electrical cabling system at Floyd Bennett Field has had multiple failures due to its age. Most of the cabling dates from the early 1940s when the Field was converted for use as a Naval Air Station during World War II. The remaining cabling is a mix of the original cables from the 1930s when the Field was in use as the first airport for the City of New York and cables that were recently replaced during the first phase of the project. The cabling provides primary electrical service to 95% of the buildings on Floyd Bennett Field. Areas served by the cables include the Jamaica Bay Education Campus, Historic Hangar Row including the Ryan
Visitor Center, the Jamaica Bay unit maintenance shop and headquarters, and headquarters for the USPP (United States Park Police) New York Field Office. This phase of this project will complete the replacement of the deteriorated, underground electrical cable at Floyd Bennett
Field.
Investigation Based on the Schematic Design for this project, the cable replacement project includes the use of existing electrical manholes at Floyd Bennett Field to route and splice cables. An investigation of these manholes was performed to document their conditions and to note any areas of concern with the reuse approach.
The manhole investigation at Floyd Bennett Field was performed by HDR on November 14th, 16th, and 17th, 2016 to inspect 41 manholes and to document the existing conditions of each structure noting any areas of concern observed during this process. To facilitate the investigation, the National Park Service (NPS) maintenance staff for Floyd Bennett Field located all the manholes a week prior, marked them with long metal bars embedded in the ground, spray painted orange on the covers for visibility and pumped the water out of the manholes.
Some of the manholes were located in areas overgrown with weeds, trees, and shrubs that required excavation and the use of heavy machinery. During the investigation, HDR was accompanied by the maintenance staff to aid in locating each structure, to remove each structures cover, and pump out any additional water if encountered.
The investigation included verifying each structure’s designation number, documenting the cover/access details, determining if there appeared to be any surface drainage problems that would cause surface water to flow into the manhole based on the surrounding surface grade, reviewing the structural condition, verifying code compliance, and determining the constructability for new ductbanks. To facilitate a safe investigation and avoid shutting down any facilities by de-energizing circuits in the manholes, a camera was lowered into each manhole. The camera was attached to a medium voltage insulated fiberglass pole with a lighting attachment for increased visibility of the manholes. The camera was remotely controlled from a tablet and these devices were connected through a wireless connection. The camera transmits a high-resolution video feed to the tablet for the investigation and each side of the structure was photographed in high-resolution to help determine if there were any areas of concern. A plan view of the manhole locations is located in Appendix A, a photo log of areas of concern in
Appendix B, and manhole observations in Appendix C.
Findings The investigation revealed that three different types of construction methods were used for the manholes. The first and most common method of construction is cast-in-place (CIP) concrete walls with a CIP roof slab, which comprised 34 of the reviewed structures. The second most common construction method, found in 6 of the structures, was all brick walls with a CIP roof slab. The third construction method was one manhole that was built with CMU (concrete masonry unit) block walls and a CIP roof slab. Most of the manholes (regardless of construction type) had collars built of brick to elevate the manhole lid up to the appropriate elevation. Most of the manholes are constructed in a square shape although a few of the CIP structures were constructed in an octagonal shape.
The structural condition of the manholes, even though the inside of the structures have been discolored over the years, are in remarkably good shape, no cracks were found in any of the CIP walls or roof slabs and all of the brick and CMU walls were in good shape, with a few areas of concern listed below:
Manhole No. 8 has a lid that is chipped (See Photo B-1).
Manhole No. 9X has a rectangular roof hatch with rusted away hinges (See Photo B-2).
This manhole is located in the front of an occupied residence and its lid can easily shift and fall into the manhole creating a safety hazard.
Manhole No. 113, 11W, and H2 have roof slabs with exposed rebar around the opening
(See Photos B-3, B-4, and B-5) with Manhole No. 113 exhibiting concrete honeycombing
(See Photo B-3).
Manhole No. 3 has two cracks in its brick collar (See Photo B-6).
Manhole No. 9-2 and 14-2 have a collar that is slightly offset from the roof opening (See
Photos B-7 and B-8).
Appendix A - Floyd Bennett Field Primary Electrical Cables Plan View
Appendix B - Areas of Concern B-1 Photo – Manhole No. 8
B-2 Photo – Manhole No. 9X
B-3 Photo – Manhole No. 113
B-4 Photo – Manhole No. 11W
B-5 Photo – Manhole No. H2
B-6 Photo – Manhole No. 3
B-7 Photo – Manhole No. 9-2
B-8 Photo – Manhole No. 14-2
B-1 Photo – Manhole No. 8
Area of Concern:
The manhole cover is chipped and can fall into the hole.
B-2 Photo – Manhole No. 9X
Area of Concern :
The hinges of the rectangular roof hatch has completely rusted away. This manhole is located in the front of an occupied residence and its lid can easily shift and fall into the manhole creating a safety hazard.
B-3 Photo – Manhole No. 113
There are several pieces of exposed rebar around the roof opening along with concrete honeycombing.
B-4 Photo – Manhole No. 11W
There is exposed rebar in the roof opening. The exposure is minor.
B-5 Photo – Manhole No. H2
There is exposed rebar on the underside of the roof.
B-6 Photo – Manhole No. 3
There are two cracks in the brick collar.
B-7 Photo – Manhole No. 9-2
Collar is slightly offset from the roof opening.
B-8 Photo – Manhole No. 14-2
Collar is slightly offset from the roof opening.
Appendix C - Manhole Observations 1-14 ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Manhole No.
2 ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Manhole No.
2-1 ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Manhole No.
3 ............................................................................................................................................ 16 Manhole No.
4 ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Manhole No.
5 ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Manhole No.
5AW ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Manhole No.
5BW ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Manhole No.
6 ............................................................................................................................................ 21 Manhole No.
6W ......................................................................................................................................... 22 Manhole No.
7 ............................................................................................................................................ 23 Manhole No.
7W ......................................................................................................................................... 24 Manhole No.
8 ............................................................................................................................................ 25 Manhole No.
8-1 ......................................................................................................................................... 26 Manhole No.
8-2 ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Manhole No.
8W ......................................................................................................................................... 28 Manhole No.
8X .......................................................................................................................................... 29 Manhole No.
9 ............................................................................................................................................ 30 Manhole No.
9-1 ......................................................................................................................................... 31 Manhole No.
9-2 ......................................................................................................................................... 32 Manhole No.
9W ......................................................................................................................................... 33 Manhole No.
9X .......................................................................................................................................... 34 Manhole No.
10 .......................................................................................................................................... 35 Manhole No.
10W ....................................................................................................................................... 36 Manhole No.
11W ....................................................................................................................................... 37 Manhole No.
14 .......................................................................................................................................... 38 Manhole No.
14-1 ....................................................................................................................................... 39 Manhole No.
14-2 ....................................................................................................................................... 40 Manhole No.
15-5 ....................................................................................................................................... 41 Manhole No.
17 .......................................................................................................................................... 42 Manhole No.
22 .......................................................................................................................................... 43 Manhole No.
23 .......................................................................................................................................... 44 Manhole No.
24 .......................................................................................................................................... 45 Manhole No.
44 .......................................................................................................................................... 46 Manhole No.
44B ........................................................................................................................................ 47 Manhole No.
45 .......................................................................................................................................... 48 Manhole No.
46 .......................................................................................................................................... 49 Manhole No.
47 .......................................................................................................................................... 50 Manhole No.
113 ........................................................................................................................................ 51 Manhole No.
H1 .......................................................................................................................................... 52 Manhole No.
H2 .......................................................................................................................................... 53 Manhole No.
1-14 Manhole No.
North Wall East Wall
South Wall West Wall
Manhole Observations
Cover/Access Type: Cast Iron/Round
Cover/Access Size: 37.5” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
Code Compliance for New Ductbanks: Adequate size
Constructability for New Ductbanks: No noted concerns
2 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
2-1 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
3 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
4 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
5 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition:
Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted. Two cracks in the brick collar (See Photo B-6, Appendix)
Code Compliance for New Ductbanks: Adequate size
Constructability for New Ductbanks: No additional concerns noted. Collar cracks should not affect ability to install new ductbanks.
5AW Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 33” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
5BW Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 33” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
6 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Poor, the surrounding area appears to slope down to the manhole
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
6W Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 33” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
7 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Poor, the surrounding area appears to slope down to the manhole
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
7W Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 33” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
8 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition:
Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted. Area of concern regarding cover (See Photo B-1, Appendix B)
Code Compliance for New Ductbanks: Adequate size
Constructability for New Ductbanks: No additional concerns noted. Area of concern regarding cover should not affect ability to install new ductbanks.
8-1 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
8-2 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
8W Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 33” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
8X Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Poor, the surrounding area appears to slope down to the manhole
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
9 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 32” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Poor, the surrounding area appears to slope down to the manhole
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
9-1 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
9-2 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition:
Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted. Collar is slightly offset from the roof opening (See Photo B-7, Appendix B)
Code Compliance for New Ductbanks: Adequate size
Constructability for New Ductbanks: No additional concerns noted. Offset collar should not affect ability to install
9W Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 33” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
9X Manhole No.
Cover/Access Type: Cast Iron/Square
Cover/Access Size: 48”x50”
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition:
Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted. Area of concern regarding roof hatch (See Photo B-2, Appendix B)
Code Compliance for New Ductbanks: Adequate size
Constructability for New Ductbanks: No additional concerns noted. Area of concern regarding roof hatch should not affect ability to install new ductbanks.
10 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
10W Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
11W Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 33” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition:
Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted. Exposed rebar (See Photo B-4, Appendix B)
Code Compliance for New Ductbanks: Adequate size
Constructability for New Ductbanks: No additional concerns noted. Exposed rebar should not affect ability to install new ductbanks.
14 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 37.5” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
14-1 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 37.5” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
14-2 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 37.5” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition:
Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted. Collar is slightly offset from the roof opening (See Photo B-8, Appendix B)
Code Compliance for New Ductbanks: Adequate size
Constructability for New Ductbanks: No additional concerns noted. Offset collar should not affect ability to install
15-5 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 32”x32”
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
17 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 37.5” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
22 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
23 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
24 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
44 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
44B Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
45 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 27” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition:
Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted. A large amount of dirt inside.
46 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
47 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 29” Diameter
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
113 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 31.5”x26”
Surface Drainage: Poor, the surrounding area appears to slope down to the manhole
Structural Condition:
Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. Exposed rebar and honeycombing (See Photo B-3, Appendix B)
Code Compliance for New Ductbanks: Adequate size
Constructability for New Ductbanks: No additional concerns noted. Exposed rebar and honeycombing should not affect ability to install new ductbanks.
H1 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 32”x26”
Surface Drainage: Good
Structural Condition: Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. No roof damage noted
H2 Manhole No.
Cover/Access Size: 32”x26”
Surface Drainage: Poor, the surrounding area appears to slope down to the manhole
Structural Condition:
Good, no cracks, spalls or rust damage. Exposed rebar (See Photo B-5, Appendix B)
Code Compliance for New Ductbanks: Adequate size
Constructability for New Ductbanks: No additional concerns noted. Exposed rebar should not affect ability to install new ductbanks.
| Introduction |
| Investigation |
| Findings |
| Appendix A - Floyd Bennett Field Primary Electrical Cables Plan View |
| Appendix B - Areas of Concern |
| Appendix C - Manhole Observations |
File details come from the government source that posted it.