B09-Questions_and_Responses_0001.pdf
PDF 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BOEM DATA MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
- Solicitation number
- 140M0126Q0043
About this file
This is a Questions and Responses document for RFQ 140M0126Q0043. The document addresses two clarifications from prospective contractors regarding past performance and contract history requirements.
The first question clarifies that this is a new requirement with no incumbent contractor or prior similar services procured by the customer. The second response confirms that small business prime contractors may satisfy the RFQ's requirement for two recent Government contracts by submitting relevant past performance from proposed subcontractors or teaming partners, provided those contracts are similar in size, scope, and complexity. This accommodation enables small businesses to leverage qualified subcontractors' and key personnel's prior Government experience to meet the solicitation's past performance evaluation criteria.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140M0126Q0043_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140M0126Q0043.pdf | ||
| B08-140M0126Q0043.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Responses 140M0126Q0043
1. Is there any incumbent/recompete or this is a brand-new project? If yes, could you please provide us with their award number or even if the customer bought similar services in the past.
Response: No, this is a new requirement.
2. The RFQ requests two recent Government contracts relevant in size, scope, and complexity.
For a small business prime contractor utilizing qualified subcontractors and key personnel, may relevant Government past performance from a proposed subcontractor or teaming partner be submitted to satisfy this requirement?
Response: Yes
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .