Questions_and_Responses__Amend_1_0001.pdf

PDF 70 KB Posted

Attached to
Bridge Kits for William Finley NWR
Solicitation number
140F0822Q0035
Issued by

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Questions and Responses 1-Aug-22 Amendment No. 1 to Solicitation

No. Question and/or Notes Response Date of Posting

1 Will you consider a manufacturer using an L/360 deflection requirement instead of the L/800 for the bridges?

Yes, the USFWS will consider an alternate L/360 Deflection Requirement. Refer to Revised SOW, which now allows for this option. To Be Determined.

Will you consider a manufacturer using the Allowable Stress Design (ASF) Methodology using ASCE-7 Load Combinations instead of the AASHTO guidelines. This would allow the finite element analysis to meet Factors-of- Safety to be 2.0 for the loads specified under the Salient Characteristics?

Yes, the USFWS will consider an alternate Design Methodology in lieu of Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Allowable Stress (Strength) Design (ASD) will be considered acceptable with the use of ASCE Standard 7 Load Combinations. Refer to Revised Technical Specifications, which allows for this change.

To Be Determined.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .