Amendment 001 - 11. Attachment 10. Past Performance Questionnaire_090821.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fairbanks Command and Data Acquisition Station (FCDAS) Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Support Services
- Solicitation number
- 1332KP21RNEEB0003
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluation of offerors for the Fairbanks Command and Data Acquisition Station (FCDAS) Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Support Services requirement. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) requires contractor personnel to install, operate, and repair highly specialized satellite ground station equipment at the FCDAS facility in Fairbanks, Alaska. Additional requirements include essential services to maintain facility buildings, vehicles, roads and infrastructure; administrative and other support duties such as management, IT administration, shipping and receiving, property management, and documentation; as well as security guard services, facility maintenance, and janitorial services. Offerors must be able to perform mission-essential functions 24/7/365, including during inclement weather or emergencies, with no serious hazards to personnel. References for offerors will be contacted to provide ratings on categories including successful performance, quality and timeliness, management of subcontractors, cost management, communication, proactive management, customer satisfaction, and overall performance.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1332KP21RNEEB0003
SECTION J - ATTACHMENT 10
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Offeror/Contractor: Please complete Part 1 and provide each reference/evaluator with the form.
Reference/Evaluator: Please complete Part 2 and provide your candid responses. The information you provide will be used in the evaluation of the Offeror/Contractor for potential award of a federal contract or agreement; therefore, it is important that your information is factual, accurate, and complete as possible. You may annotate and provide the correct information accordingly in Part 1 if any information is incorrect.If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward to the person who does.
Please submit the completed survey by email to Contracting Officer, Gion Lalican (gion.lalican@noaa.gov) and Contract Specialist, Samantha Dublin (samantha.dublin@noaa.gov) prior to 4:00 PM (ET) on September 29, 2021.
PART 1: (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR)
A. NAME OF COMPANY BEING EVALUATED:
B. NAME/ADDRESS OF COMPANY PROVIDING EVALUATION INFORMATION:
Company Name:
Evaluator's Name and Title:
Address:
Telephone No.: E-mail Address:
C. PROJECT INFORMATION
(Under Work Description, include similarities/relevance to solicitation project AND a description of work performed to include specific requirements, location, and complexity.)
Contract No.:
Date of Award:
Project Title/Location:
Work Description:
Contract Type:
Original Contract Price:
Final Contract Price:
Original Completion Date:
Forecasted/Actual Completion Date:
Work was with: Commercial ____ Fed. Gov't ____ Local/City/State Gov't ____
PART 2: EVALUATION (INFORMATION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE/EVALUATOR RESPONDING FOR THE OFFEROR):
For each performance element identified below, references should evaluate performance of the firm or individual identified in Part 1 of this form. Where the reference lacks sufficient information to provide an evaluation for a particular performance element, this should be noted. Where any deficiency or unfavorable information is identified, the reference should identify any mitigating factors that may weigh in favor for the person/firm on whose behalf the reference is provided (i.e., problems due to causes outside the contractor's control). An individual within your organization that is knowledgeable of the contractor's day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the contractor's (Offeror's) performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable.
The following chart depicts the ratings that are to be used to evaluate the contractor's performance:
| O |
| G |
| A |
| M |
| U |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unacceptable |
| The Offeror provided exceptional performance in the area being evaluated and there were no weaknesses or deficiencies identified. |
| The Offeror has a very good performance record in the area being evaluated. Only minor weaknesses or deficiencies were identified. |
| The Offeror’s performance was satisfactory but not otherwise exemplary. |
Weaknesses or deficiencies were identified in their performance.
| The Offeror has a marginal performance record and one or two significant weaknesses or deficiencies were identified. |
| The Offeror has a poor performance record. Several significant weaknesses or deficiencies were identified, which lead to a material failure in meeting the contract terms and conditions. |
When responding to the questions listed, circle or highlight the letter that most accurately describes the contractor's performance or situation. For any Outstanding, Marginal or Unacceptable rating assessed by the customer on individual elements or overall rating assigned on the past performance questionnaire, shall include an explanatory narrative to be provided in the remarks block. These narratives need not be lengthy, just adequate to support evidence of the specific ratings noted above. Failure to provide information supporting the assigned rating may result in a lower rating being designated than that assigned by the Evaluator. If a question is not applicable, please indicate as such. If you circle a Yes or No answer that is marked with an asterisk (*), please provide a corresponding explanation in the remarks block. If more space is required, use the back of the questionnaire or attach additional pages. Handwritten responses to this questionnaire are acceptable. However, if responses are handwritten, please print legible. Your time and effort in providing this information is vitally important and is greatly appreciated.
SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
1. Has an election ever been made not to exercise an option or continue relations due to the contractor’s poor performance?
| YES* |
| NO |
2. Has a Contract Discrepancy Report ever been issued?
| YES* |
| NO |
3. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
Partially _______ Completely _______
| YES* |
| NO |
| 4. Overall rating of contractor’s performance. |
| O G A M U |
5. Would you contract with or hire this contractor again?
| YES* |
| NO |
| 6. What role in contract administration did you perform (i.e. CO, COR) and for how long? |
| _____________ |
QUALITY AND TIMELINESS OF DELIVERY OF SERVICES
| 1. Contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions. |
| O G A M U |
| 2. Quality of products/services furnished. |
| O G A M U |
| 3. Overall rating of contractor’s quality of service. |
| O G A M U |
EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF SUBCONTRACTORS
| 1. Contractor’s ability to manage and coordinate subcontractors to successfully complete tasks. |
| O G A M U |
COST MANAGEMENT
1. Did the contractor successfully complete the project within budget?
| YES |
| NO* |
LEVEL OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE CONTRACTING PARTIES
| 1. Contractor's ability to communicate in a timely manner with stakeholders especially when problems arose. |
| O G A M U |
PROACTIVE MANAGEMENT
| 1. Contractor's ability to meet appropriate staffing levels with qualified personnel in order to meet requirements. |
| O G A M U |
| 2. Rate the contractor's ability to replace key personnel in a timely fashion. |
| O G A M U |
| 3. Overall rating of contractor's management of key personnel. |
| O G A M U |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
| 1. Contractor's ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. |
| O G A M U |
| 2. Contractor’s ability to use effective approaches and provide technical expertise and resources to solve contract problems. |
| O G A M U |
| 3. Contractor’s willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues. |
| O G A M U |
| 4. Contractor’s overall rating of customer satisfaction. |
| O G A M U |
*NOTE: For any Outstanding, Marginal, or Unacceptable ratings assessed by the customer when completing this form, please include an explanatory narrative in the “remarks” block below.
*REMARKS
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts performed by this company? If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact.
1332KP20BNEEN0005 Attachment 4 Page of
1332KP21RNEEB0003 Attachment 10 Page of
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .