Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pisces Fish Handling System Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1305M225Q0182
About this file
The provided document is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for evaluating a contractor's performance across three key areas: Quality of Service, Schedule, and Management. The questionnaire is designed for the NOAA Ship PISCES Fish Handling System contract (Solicitation Number: 1305M225Q0182), with completed forms to be submitted to chris.meconnahey@noaa.gov by 12 August 2025 at 4:00 PM EDT.
The evaluation uses a five-tier rating system ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, allowing detailed assessment of contractor performance. Raters are asked to provide ratings and comments for each performance category, focusing on contractual requirements, problem-solving effectiveness, timeliness, coordination, and overall customer satisfaction. The document provides specific definitions for each rating level, enabling a comprehensive and standardized evaluation of the contractor's performance across different aspects of the contract execution.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_1305M225Q0182_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment I Specification - PISCES Fish Handling System (1) (1).pdf | ||
| Attachment II - Past Performance Information Form.pdf | ||
| Sol_1305M225Q0182.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
| REFERENCE CONTRACT #: | _______________________________ | |
| (the contract the evaluation is based on) |
Evaluator’s Name: ___________________________
Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________
Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: ____________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to chris.meconnahey@noaa.gov no later than 12 August 2025 at 4:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Source Selection Information
Source Selection Information
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: Rater’s Signature: Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .