Attachment-Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
NOAA/NMFS/Operations, Maintenance, and Facility Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
1305M2-19-Q-NFFM-0274
Issued by
Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NOAA/NMFS/Operations, Maintenance, and Facility Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF-30_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
SF-30_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
SF-30_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
1305M2-19-Q-NFFM0274_SF-30_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_3-Past_Performance_Information_Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_4-NOAA_Security_Form_OSY_Action_Request.pdf PDF
Attachment_2-Schedule_of_Items_and_Pricing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1305M2-19-Q-NFFM-0274_RFQ__Facility_Support.pdf PDF
Attachment_6-_CBA_Local_9.pdf PDF
Attachment_7-_CBA-Local_400.pdf PDF
Attachment_5-_QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment_1-Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: 1305M2-19-Q-NFFM-0274

Source Selection Information

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: _______________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Samantha Alb no later than Monday, August 19, 2019 at 12:00 PM EST.

Samantha.Alb @noaa.gov

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

mailto:jana.kolb@noaa.gov

Source Selection Information

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Source Selection Information

3. COST CONTROL

Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Source Selection Information

4. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Source Selection Information

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________

Rater’s Signature: ________________________

Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Samantha Alb no later than Monday, August 19, 2019 at 12:00 PM EST samantha.alb@noaa.gov mailto:samantha.alb@noaa.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it.