Attachment_8_Updated_Past_Performance_Questionn.pdf

PDF 212 KB Posted

Attached to
Southeast Fisheries Science Center Observer Program Support Services
Solicitation number
1305M2-18-R-NFFN-0002
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluating contractors for a NOAA solicitation seeking observer support services. The questionnaire assesses offerors on quality of service, schedule, cost control, and management. Respondents will rate contractors on a scale from exceptional to unsatisfactory for each category and provide comments. The completed questionnaire must be returned to the NOAA contract specialist Julia Klotz by September 6, 2018. The solicitation seeks a single-award IDIQ contract to provide observer support services for NOAA's Southeast Fisheries Science Center Observer Program. The requirement is 100% set aside for small businesses.

Updated Attachment 8

View the file

Other files

Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: 1305M2-18-R-NFFN-0002

Attachment: 8

Source Selection Information

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR BEING REVIEWED:

PERSON COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE

(and agency represented):

REFERENCE CONTRACT #:

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the

Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Send Completed Questionnaire to the Contract Specialist, Julia Klotz no later than 09/06/2018 12:00 pm EST: julia.callahan@noaa.gov

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

Attachment: 9

Source Selection Information

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the

Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Source Selection Information

3. COST CONTROL

Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the

Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Source Selection Information

4. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the

Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Source Selection Information

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________

Rater’s Signature: ________________________

Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Julia Klotz no later than 09/06/2018 12:00 pm EST: julia.callahan@noaa.gov

CONTRACTOR BEING REVIEWED:
PERSON COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE and agency represented:
REFERENCE CONTRACT:
RATINGRow1:
RATINGRow2:
RATINGRow3:
RATINGRow4:
RATINGRow5:
RATINGRow1_2:
RATINGRow2_2:
RATINGRow3_2:
RATINGRow4_2:
RATINGRow5_2:
RATINGRow1_3:
RATINGRow2_3:
RATINGRow3_3:
RATINGRow4_3:
RATINGRow5_3:
RATINGRow1_4:
RATINGRow2_4:
RATINGRow3_4:
RATINGRow4_4:
RATINGRow5_4:
Raters Name:
Date:
Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .