1282B124Q0025 RFQ Williams Hand Thinning.pdf

Agriculture

United States Department of

Forest EAZ Acquisition Management 160-A Zillicoa St

Service Acquisition Management Asheville NC 28802

USDA Forest Service

PPS- SPOC

Intermountain Branch

1400 Independence Avenue, Mailstop 1138

Washington, DC 20250

Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper

26 April 2024

USDA Forest Service

Crystal Amos, Contracting Officer

SPOC-Intermountain

1400 Independence Avenue, Mailstop 1138

Washington, DC 20250

Subject: Request for Quotation, 1282B124Q0025, Williams Hand Thinning

This is a Request for Quotation, for hand thinning services, Salmon-Challis National Forest. The Forest

Service intends to award one, FFP Task Order to one IDIQ holder, based on this RFQ. All terms and conditions of the parent IDIQ apply to this requirement. Please review the attached documents and submit questions on or before 02 May 2024, 12:00 P.M., CDT. You may submit your quote to Steven Dahlgren, steven.dahlgren@usda.gov, NLT 10 May 2024, 1:00 P.M., CDT. Late submissions will not be accepted.

(1) The estimated period of performance begins 01 July 2024 – 31 October 2025.

(2) NAICS: 115310; PSC: F003

(3) The project magnitude is: $500,000 and $1,000,000.

(4) Basis of Award: Past Performance and Price. Past Performance shall consist of recent projects completed within the last three years. Project must relevant, similar scope and complexity.

Quoter must provide complete name, email and phone number of government POC, dollar value, period of performance and contract number. Quoters must also provide CPARS print out.

(5) All submissions shall be written in English, include a work plan, schedule of Items, past performance references and CPARS evaluation print out for three recent, (within last three years), projects similar in price and scope.

(6) Evaluation: The government will make a best value determination using performance price tradeoff. Quotes will be evaluated for completeness and compliance.

Relevancy Rating:

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

mailto:steven.dahlgren@usda.gov

Past Performance Confidence Rating

Price will be evaluated to determine whether the quoted price is fair and reasonable and in alignment with the work requirements. The Government will evaluate total overall price to determine overall best value.

The Government reserves the right to communicate and/or conduct exchanges with any or all contractors submitting a quotation. If it is advantageous to the Government to do so. This statement is not to be construed to mean the Government is obligated to communicate with every Contractor (Note: FAR Part

15 procedures do not apply to this requirement; formal discussions are not applicable). A contractor may be eliminated from consideration without further communication if it is quote is not among those contractors considered most advantageous to the Government based on a best value determination.

Sincerely, CRYSTAL AMOS

Contracting Officer

Attachments:

(1) RFQ

(2) Maps/Drawing

(3) Wage Determination

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past.

performance.