127EAW25R0054 - RFI Official Responses - 1.pdf
PDF 176 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 127EAW25R0054 - Lumsden Road Repair
- Solicitation number
- 127EAW25R0054
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document is a Request for Information (RFI) for the Lumsden Road Repair project, solicitation number 127EAW25R0054, issued by the United States Forest Service (USFS). The RFI contains five official questions and responses addressing key bidding details, including bid bond requirements, liquidated damages, socio-economic set-asides, and technical specifications for two road repair sites (MP 10.21 and MP 9.17). The USFS responses clarify that there are no liquidated damages, no specific socio-economic set-asides beyond total small business, and geotechnical reports for both sites will be provided. For the MP 9.17 site, the agency indicates that on-site excavation material is anticipated to be used as backfill for the RSS (Reinforced Soil Slope), as detailed in the project sheets.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) OFFICIAL RESPONSES
127EAW25R0054 - Lumsden Road Repair
RFI responses will be responded to as necessary in amendment format which will be posted to the solicitation via beta.SAM.gov
Telephone requests for information will not be accepted or returned.
RFI #1 – Please advise on the bid bond amount?
USFS Response – Please review the solicitation clause 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee which details the requirements.
RFI #2 – Please advise on the liquidated damages amount?
USFS Response – There are no Liquidated Damages.
RFI #3 – Please advise if there is a DBE goal or a local business preference program.
USFS Response – There are no socio-economic set asides besides total small business.
RFI #4 – Sheet 6 of 21 for MP 10.21 and sheet 6 of 20 for MP 9.17 reference a geotechnical report in the first paragraph of notes. Can these geotechnical reports please be provided?
USFS Response – Yes, geotechnical reports for both sites are attached.
RFI #5 – On Site MP 9.17, there isn’t a Bid Item for Select Granular Backfill as in Site MP
10.21 Item 26103
USFS Response – At site MP 9.17, suitable excavation material from on-site excavation is anticipated to be used as backfill for the RSS, see EXCAVATION note Sheet 4 and RSS
BACKFILL MATERIAL note Sheet 6.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .