Attachment B Performance Report.docx

Contractor Performance Report

Contractor Information:

Firm Name:

Point of Contact at the Firm:

POC Phone Number:

POC Email:

Project Information:

Contract/Task Order Number:

Project Title:

Project Description:

Project Location:

Award Date:

Completion Date:

Actual Completion Date:

Explain Difference:

Original Contract Price:

Final Contract Price:

Explain Difference:

CLIENT’S ASSESSMENT OF THE CONTRACTOR

Client Information:

Business/Organization Name:

Point of Contact for the Client:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email:

Point of Contact’s Role in the Project:

Date Questionnaire Completed:

Client’s Signature:

Rating Scale:

EXCEPTIONAL

(5) Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

(4) Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

(3) Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

(2) Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

(1) Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Quality of Product or Service:

Quality of Deliverable (Met Specifications)

Conformance to good standards of workmanship

Adequacy of the QC Plan

Implementation of the QC Plan

Quality of QC Documentation

Identification/Correction of Deficient Work

Adequacy of Submittals

Use of Specified Materials

Comments:

Cost Control:

Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)

Were invoices current, accurate, and complete

Reasonableness of price change proposals submitted

Proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

Comments:

Schedule:

Adequacy of Initial Schedule

Adherence to Approved Schedule

Resolution of Delays

Timely submission of Required Documentation

Timely submission of Updated and Revised Schedules

Comments:

Management / Business Relations:

Management of Resources/Personnel

Key Personnel were Utilized Appropriately and Effectively

Coordination and Control of Subcontractors

Professional Conduct

Review/Resolution of Subcontractor’s Issues

Change Order Activity (By Contractor)

Maintains an Adequate Work Force

Responsiveness to Corrective Actions

Identifies and Mitigates Risk

Comments:

Regulatory Compliance:

Complied With Contract Clause Requirements

Complied With Reporting Requirements

Complied With Design Requirements

Compliance With Labor Laws And Regulations

Complied With Safety Laws And Regulations

Correction Of Noted Deficiencies

Comments:

Overall Rating:

Overall Rating

Comments:

Recommendation