Past Performance Questionnaire V2.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

E (EXCELLENT) – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds the Government’s expectations. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

G (GOOD) – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. (SIGNIFICANT

CONFIDENCE)

S (SATISFACTORY) – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. (CONFIDENCE)

M (MARGINAL) –Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. (LITTLE CONFIDENCE)

P (POOR) – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. (NO CONFIDENCE)

N (NEUTRAL) – No relevant past performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance risk prediction. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for the contractor or their key personnel. (This is neither a negative or positive assessment.)

1. Was this a competitive Contract? YES NO

2. Role of contractor. Prime Sub

3. Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance.

E G S M P N

4. Compliance with contractual terms and conditions. E G S M P N

5. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts.

E G S M P N

6. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements.

E

G

S

M

P

N

7. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).

8. Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors?

E G S M P N

9. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports).

10. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

E G S M P N

11. Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations.

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

12. Effectiveness of on-site management and control multidiscipline construction categories, including subcontractors.

13. Effectiveness of material management. E G S M P N

14. Effectiveness of acquisition management. E G S M P N

15. Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.

16. Contractor safety record. E G S M P N

17. Responsiveness regarding safety issues. E G S M P N

18. If this is/was a Government cost type contract, the Contractor’s timeliness in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation and monthly status reports/budget variance reports.

19. If this is/was a Government cost type contract, the Contractor’s accuracy regarding monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation and monthly status reports/budget variance reports.

20. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

21. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort

22. If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

YES

NO

23. Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problem?

YES NO

24. In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

COMMENTS: Objective Comments / concerns relating to this Offeror.