12444826Q0006_Past Perf Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 188 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Hamden, CT Janitorial Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12444826Q0006
- Issued by
- Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This is a Past and Present Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract solicitation. Solicitation Number 12444826Q0006 concerns Hamden Janitorial Services and is being used to evaluate contractor past performance as part of the source selection process. The questionnaire is designated as source selection sensitive under FAR 2.101 and 3.104. Respondents must complete Section A (General Information) by providing or correcting the contractor's name, address, telephone number, project title, contract number, dollar amount, contract period, and the contractor's role (Prime Contractor, Sub-Contractor, or Key Personnel). Section B requires respondent information including name, title, telephone number, and email address. Completed questionnaires must be returned by COB February 8th, 2026 at 2359 ET via email to Christopher Hamilton at christopher.j.hamilton@usda.gov.
Section C contains the performance evaluation criteria using a 1 to 5 rating scale, where 1 represents Unsatisfactory, 2 represents Marginal, 3 represents Satisfactory, 4 represents Very Good, and 5 represents Exceptional, with N/A available where appropriate. Evaluators must rate the contractor on nine performance factors including management capability, problem-solving, quality control, timely deficiency correction, problem identification, alternative approaches, initiative, Government cooperation, and overall performance. Three yes/no questions address whether the contractor received a cure or show cause notice, whether the contractor is rated in CPARS, and whether the evaluator would award another contract to the contractor. Narrative explanations are required for any ratings of 1 or 2. The questionnaire includes space for remarks and requires identification of the contractor's name and contract number.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_SOL_12444826Q0006_Part 12 Combined Synopsis_Solicitation_Revised 11 Dec 2025.pdf | ||
| 12444826Q0006_Performance Work Statement NRS Hamden Custodial.pdf | ||
| 12444826Q0006_Experience Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Service Contract Act WD 2015-4127 REV 33 120325.pdf | ||
| SCHEDULE OF ITEMS - WITH OPTIONS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SOL_12444826Q0006_Part 12 Combined Synopsis_Solicitation_Revised 11 Dec 2025.pdf | ||
| 12444826Q0006_Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan NRS Hamden Custodial.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation # 12444826Q0006 Hamden Janitorial Services
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: _____________________ Telephone Number: ______________________
Address: ________________________________________
Project Title or Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: __________________Dollar Amount: $ _____________________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ___________________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: ___________________Title: _________________________________________
Telephone Number: _______________________________
Email Address: _______________________________
NOTE: NOTE: Please return no later than COB February 8th, 2026. @ 2359 ET via email to Christopher Hamilton @ christopher.j.hamilton@usda.gov mailto:christopher.j.hamilton@usda.gov
Solicitation # 12444826Q0006 Hamden Janitorial Services
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Alternatively, select N/A where appropriate.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
2. Home office participated in solving significant local problems. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
5. Identified problems as they occurred. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
6. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
7. Displayed initiative to solve problems. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
8. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
9. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
10. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
11. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO
12. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” YES/NO
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER
Remarks: ________________________________________________________________________________
NOTE: NOTE: Please return no later than COB February 8th, 2026. @ 2359 ET via email to Christopher Hamilton @ christopher.j.hamilton@usda.gov
1 2 3 4 5 N/A UNSATISFACTORY MARGINAL SATISFACTORY VERY GOOD EXCEPTIONAL NEUTRAL or N/A
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit.
Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performance, the record is inconclusive, or rated area is not applicable.
mailto:christopher.j.hamilton@usda.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .