Amendment 03 - Attachment- Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Renovate 15 Laboratories-Byron GA. Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12405B24R0013
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire to be completed by a commercial client's technical manager, business manager, or a government agency's Contracting Officer Representative (COR) or Contracting Officer (CO). The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's past performance, including the quality of services received, personnel, subcontractor management, business relations, timeliness of performance, customer satisfaction, and financial controls. The respondent is asked to provide ratings and comments for each evaluation factor, as well as indicate if they would select the firm for future work. The completed questionnaire is to be submitted to the Contracting Officer, Huron Virden, at the USDA by 1:00 p.m. Central on July 24, 2024.
The related federal contract opportunity is a Request for Proposal (RFP) for construction services to renovate 15 laboratories at the USDA's Agricultural Research Service Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory in Byron, Georgia. The work includes providing all labor, equipment, materials, professional services, and supervision necessary to renovate 4 laboratories with options to renovate 11 additional laboratories. The contractor shall provide a detailed technical proposal and cost breakdown for the entire project. The solicitation number is 12405B24R0013, and the NAICS code is 236220 with a size standard of $45.0M. Contractors are required to be actively registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to submitting a proposal.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 05 -- SF-30.pdf | ||
| Amendment 04 -- SF-30.pdf | ||
| Amendment 03 -- SF-30.pdf | ||
| Amendment 02--SF-30.pdf | ||
| Amendment 02 - Attachment-Compressed (zipped) folder.zip | ZIP file | |
| Amendment 01--SF-30.pdf | ||
| Amendment 01-Attchment 2 - Compressed (zipped) Folder.zip | ZIP file | |
| Amendment 01-Attachment 1 --Compressed (zipped) Folder.zip | ZIP file | |
| ATTACHMENT - I - SoW -15 Lab Renovations - Byron GA - EW (2).pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT - III - SF-24 Bid Bond.pdf | ||
| 12405B24R0013 --- SF-1442 - Request for Proposal.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT - IV - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| 12405B24R0013- Construction Clauses and Provisions.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT - II - DB Wage Determination - GA20240322.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR: SUBMIT TO YOUR COMMERCIAL CLIENT OR GOVERNMENT AGENCY REFERENCES FOR PAST PERFORMANCE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
TO BE COMPLETED BY COMMERCIAL CLIENT'S TECHNICAL MANAGER or BUSINESS MANAGER or AGENCY'S CONTRACTING OFFICER REPRESENTATIVE (COR) or CONTRACTING OFFICER (CO) Please forward completed Past Performance Questionnaire to Huron Virden, Contracting Officer, at huron.virden@usda.gov. Please ensure delivery no later 1:00 p.m. Central on July 24, 2024.
| 1. Contractor Name: |
| 2. Contract Number: |
| 3. Contractor Address: |
| 4. Contract Type: |
____ Fixed-Price ____ Cost-Reimbursement ____ Other (Please Specify) ____________________
5. Client / Agency Name:
Address:
6. Client / Agency Point of Contact:
Name:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail Address:
| 7. Period of Performance: |
| 8. Total Contract Value: $ |
9. Title of Project:
10. Please describe the work that was accomplished focusing on the scope and complexity of the work.:
11. Please describe whether the work was defined by the owner via a specification, statement of work, statement of objectives, partial/complete design document.
12. Did the Contractor encounter any noteworthy problems performing work? ________ If so, Please explain:
NOTE: Please use adjectival ratings from attached sheet
| 13. Evaluation Factor |
| 14. Comments (Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) |
| 15. Rating |
a. Quality of Services Received
b. Personnel
c. Subcontractor Mgmt
d. Business Relations
e. Timeliness of Performance
f. Customer Satisfaction
g. Financial Controls
16. Would you select this firm in the future for the same or similar services? Please explain.
| 17a. Name of Preparer: |
| 17b. Signature: |
| 17c. Title: |
| 17d. Date: |
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDELINES
Summarize contractor performance in each of the rating areas. Assign each area a rating of Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Very Good, or Excellent. Use the following instructions as guidance in making these evaluations. Note: There is no corresponding guidance for “Customer Satisfaction”. Please use the comments area on the preceding form to justify the rating given “Customer Satisfaction.”
| Ratings |
| Quality of Services Received / Personnel |
-Compliance w/contract requirements -Effectiveness of design -Quality of construction -Accuracy of reports -Appropriateness of personnel assignments -Technical excellence
Financial Controls
-Within budget -Current, accurate, complete billings -Relationship of negotiated prices to actual -Efficiencies -Change orders issued Timeliness of Performance
-Met interim milestones -Reliable -Responsive to technical direction -Completed on time Business Relations / Subcontractor Management
-Effective on-site management and personnel -Businesslike correspondence -Responsive to contract requirements -Prompt notification of problems -Reasonable / cooperative -Flexible -Proactive -Effective Small Business Subcontracting Program
| Excellent |
| There were no quality problems |
| There were no Financial issues |
| There were no delays |
| Business relations and interaction were highly effective |
Very Good
Any nonconformance experienced did not impact achievement of contract requirements Financial issues did not impact achievement of contract requirements Delays did not impact achievement of contract requirements
Business relations and interaction were usually effective
Satisfactory
Nonconformance required moderate agency involvement to ensure achievement of contract requirements
| Financial issues required moderate agency involvement to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
| Delays required moderate agency involvement to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Business relations and interaction were somewhat effective
Marginal
Nonconformance required major agency involvement to ensure achievement of contract requirements
| Financial issues required major agency involvement to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
| Delays required major agency involvement to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Business relations and interaction were marginally effective
| Unsatisfactory |
| Nonconformance |
compromised the achievement of contract requirements Financial issues compromised performance
| Delays compromised achievement of contract requirements |
| Business relations and interaction were not effective and compromised achievement of contract requirements |
G14PS000
Attachment H Past Performance Questionnaire
12405B23R0013 Past Performance Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .