Solicitation 12405B22Q0046 Amendment 00001 Contractor Questions and Answers.pdf

PDF 115 KB Posted

Attached to
Amendment 0001/12 Month Trash and Recycle Services - Base year + 4 Option years
Solicitation number
12405B22Q0046
Issued by

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation 12405B22Q0046 Contractor Questions and Answers

Q1. Was an incumbent contractor performing these services, or if this is a brand-new contract? If there is an incumbent, could you please provide the current / previous contract number?

A1. Betterwaste Management Corp 12405B21P0186

Q2. What was the prior amount awarded on this contract? The company name last service this contract?

A2. $12,574.56, Betterwaste Management Corp

Q3. Would it be ok on your end to have a container just for cardboard and the rest of the recyclables can be thrown in the trash bins along with the trash and then be picked through on our conveyor system once its processed and enters our facility for processing?

A3. This would need to be answered by Miami, FL location. The statement of work provided with solicitation does state one 6 cubic yard container for non-cardboard and one 6 cubic yard container for cardboard only.

A3. Miami Florida location If I’m understanding contractor correctly, he is saying that he can provide the two 6 cubic yard containers for trash which will also be comingled with recyclables (except cardboard), and one 6 cubic yard container just for cardboard. It is stated that the trash containers can have recyclables and that the company will actually sift through the trash to extract recyclables. Is this correct? If that is the case, then I’m ok with that. We just need to be very clear that the expectation is that the trash will be checked each time for any recyclables and that the recyclables will be disposed of properly and recycled.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .