SF30 Amendment 0001_9_Site Visit Notes.pdf

(x)

12363N26Q4043 x x

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR

OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

363N

SISTERS OR 97759

201 N PINE STREET

USDA-FS STEWARDSHIP CONTRACTING BR

363N

SISTERS OR 97759

201 N PINE STREET

PO BOX 249

USDA-FS STEWARDSHIP CONTRACTING BR

05/14/20260001

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

05/01/2026

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return ________1__________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

GRAND CUT-TO-LENGTH STEWARDSHIP IRSC

PACIFIC SOUTHWEST (PSW) STEWARDSHIP BPA

Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit

Add Attachment 9. Grand Cut-to-Length Stewardship IRSC - Site Visit Notes to the solicitation. Notes provided on page 2. Amend Clause 4. Solicitation Attachments.

Deadline for receipt of quotes is unchanged.

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

KAREN I. RUKLIC

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

X

RFQ: 12363N26Q4043

Amendment 0001 - Page 2

Attachment 9 – Grand Cut-to-Length Stewardship IRSC Site Visit Notes, 5/12/2026

Attendees

Name Company Matt Fenley & Paul Roan Fenley Family Forestry Jeff Holland Sierra Valley Enterprises Wes Mosley VM West LLC Evan Scott CTL Forest Management Representative LTC Forestry Robert Guebard USFS Ariana Vargas USFS

Notes provided by Robert Guebard:

Unit 30 was viewed. No real questions. All thought it to be straight forward.

Unit 29 was viewed. Questions about how low to cut stumps and how much material needed to be removed. All indicated this would be the most time-consuming unit.

Answered with 6-inch stumps and complete removal as stated in contract specifications.

Unit 78 was viewed. VM West and LTC Forestry didn’t go to unit 78. Otherwise, it was viewed as a straight-forward requirement. There may be more biomass than estimated due to mortality in the stand.