1150 Industrial Way Asbestos Testing.pdf

Site Survey for Asbestos Containing Materials, and Lead Based Paint

1150 Industrial Parkway Unit 106 (Excel Fitness) & Unit 107 (Halstead)

Newberg, OR 97132

January 2023

Prepared by: Apex Environmental PO Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070 503-682-9737

Oregon Department of Transportation Region #2 Right Of Way Section 455 Airport Road, SE, Building A

Hazardous Materials Group Salem, OR 97301-5397

Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Survey 1150 Industrial Parkway, Newberg, OR

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Site Location and Legal Description

1.2 Limitations

2.0 Asbestos Field Investigation

3.0 Laboratory Analytical Results

4.0 Lead (Pb) Based Paint Field Investigation

5.0 Conclusions & Recommendations:

Appendices

Appendix A: Photographs Appendix B: Laboratory Reports Appendix C: Certifications

1.0 Introduction

The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Region 2 Right of Way Section, contracted Apex Environmental of Wilsonville, OR to conduct an asbestos-containing material (ACM), and lead-based paint (LBP) survey at 1150 Industrial Parkway in Newberg, Oregon. (The Site). This survey was conducted on January 20, 2023, to accommodate the upcoming renovation of the space.

1.1 Site Location

The site consists of large industrial style building to be renovated. The building is split into 2 units. The north unit is unit 106 and formerly occupied by Excel Fitness. The south unit is unit 107 or the Halstead Space.

1.2 Limitations

No environmental site assessment can eliminate all uncertainty. Any environmental sample (i.e., asbestos samples) collected for analysis may or may not be representative of general Site conditions. The observations, findings, and conclusions in this report are based solely on the Site conditions at the time of this assessment and do not imply a warrantee or guarantee for the Site. Nothing in this report constitutes a legal opinion or service and should not be relied on as such. Apex and ODOT are not responsible for the accuracy of information provided by third parties, which may be contained in this report.

2.0 Asbestos Field Investigation

On January 20, 2023, Jose Godinez of Apex Environmental, collected bulk samples of suspected asbestos containing materials (ACM) at 1150 Industrial Parkway in Newberg, OR. Mr. Godinez is an accredited inspector under the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA). Apex photographed the materials sampled and logged the corresponding materials location, approximate quantity, and condition. Copies of select photographs are presented in Appendix B.

During the sampling process, each ACM sample was moistened throughout, prior to collection, and placed in a sealed bag. Sampling tools were wiped cleaned between samples to avoid potential cross-contamination. Apex maintained a chain of custody protocol throughout sample handling and transportation.

Apex submitted the samples to CA Labs in Baton Rouge, LA for analysis. The laboratory report and chain of custody are found in Appendix C. The samples were analyzed in accordance with AHERA requirements using polarized light microscopy (PLM).

3.0 Laboratory Analytical Results

Samples were collected of suspect materials to accommodate the upcoming renovation of the building addressed above. CA Labs analyzed the 32 material samples using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) method 600/M4-82-020 The suspect materials sampled, and the corresponding results are summarized below. Laboratory analysis of all suspect materials shows no asbestos containing materials at this location.

ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE INVENTORY

SAMPLE

MATERIAL

DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

LOCATION

RESULTS ASBESTOS %

NB-01 Wallboard and joint compound

Office area – South Unit

- ND

NB-02 Wallboard and joint compound

Office area – South Unit

- ND

NB-03 Blue sheet floor and yellow mastic

Office area – South Unit

- ND

NB-04 Blue sheet floor and yellow mastic

Office area – South Unit

- ND

NB-05 Gray cove base and tan mastic

Office area – South Unit

- ND

NB-06 Gray cove base and tan mastic

Office area – South Unit

- ND

NB-07 Brown cove base and tan mastic

Office area – South Unit

- ND

NB-08 Brown cove base and tan mastic

Office area – South Unit

- ND

NB-09 Yellow carpet mastic

Office area – South Unit

- ND

NB-10 Yellow carpet mastic

Office area – South Unit

- ND

NB-11 Blue cove base and mastic

Entrance – North unit

- ND

NB-12 Blue cove base and mastic

Entrance – North unit

- ND

NB-13 Black cove base and white mastic

Restroom – North unit

- ND

NB-14 Black cove base and white mastic

Restroom – North unit

- ND

NB-15 Black sheet floor and white mastic

Restroom – North unit

- ND

NB-16 Black sheet floor and white mastic

Restroom – North unit

- ND

NB-17 White sheet floor and yellow mastic

Locker room – North unit

- ND

NB-18 White sheet floor and yellow mastic

Locker room – North unit

- ND

- Indicates sample contains less than 1 % asbestos by volume ND: Indicates no asbestos detected

ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE INVENTORY

SAMPLE # MATERIAL

DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

LOCATION

RESULTS ASBESTOS %

NB-19 Gray sheet floor and tan mastic

Upstairs office area – North unit

- ND

NB-20 Gray sheet floor and tan mastic

Upstairs office area – North unit

- ND

NB-21 Faux wood floor and yellow mastic

Upstairs office area – North unit

- ND

NB-22 Faux wood floor and yellow mastic

Upstairs office area – North unit

- ND

NB-23 2’ x 4’ drop ceiling Upstairs office area – North unit

- ND

NB-24 2’ x 4’ drop ceiling Upstairs office area – North unit

- ND

NB-25 Yellow carpet mastic Stairs – North unit - ND NB-26 Yellow carpet mastic Stairs – North unit - ND NB-27 Caulk between floor and wall Warehouse – North unit

- ND

NB-28 Caulk between floor and wall

Warehouse – North unit

- ND

NB-29 Aggregate wall Exterior - ND NB-30 Aggregate wall Exterior - ND NB-31 Caulk and foam in-between aggregate Exterior - ND

NB-32 Caulk and foam in-between aggregate

Exterior - ND

- Indicates sample contains less than 1 % asbestos by volume ND: Indicates no asbestos detected

4.0 Lead (Pb) Based Paint Field Investigation

On January 20, 2023 Jose Godinez of Apex Environmental conducted a visual inspection of the Site, which indicated that all painted surfaces were modern latex. Apex collected paint samples from 4 areas of the predominant paint in different locations.

Apex submitted the paint samples to CA Labs of Baton Rouge Louisiana, who analyzed the samples using EPA Method AA/SW-846-7420 lead. The laboratory report and chain of custody are found in Appendix C.

The laboratory did not detect in the samples collected. However, based upon the age of the building the painted surfaces should be treated as lead-based paint. OR-OSHA regulations must be followed during the impact of painted surfaces at the building.

The current OR-OSHA Lead in Construction Regulations apply to all construction work where work is performed impacting lead painted surfaces (including manual demolition, scraping, drilling, welding, etc.) where an employee may be exposed. The regulation outlines “trigger” tasks and appropriate personal protective equipment and engineering controls to be utilized when performing these tasks. This standard applies to work involving any amount of lead. Personal exposure assessment must be performed, and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) worn when impacting these surfaces.

PPE may be reduced based upon exposure assessments.

Apex collected one representative sample of building materials for disposal representation. The sample was analyzed using Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) by ALS Environmental. The results showed concentrations less than the limit of detection. Results indicate the building demolition debris may be disposed of as general construction waste

PAINT BULK SAMPLE INVENTORY

SAMPLE # MATERIAL

DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE LOCATION RESULTS

(PPM)

NBP-01 Purple and red paint on wall

Shower – South unit <91.49

NBP-02 White paint on wall Office – South unit <86.06 NBP-03 Gray paint on steel Warehouse – South unit <248.14

NBP-04 Gray paint on wall Upstairs – North unit <91.32 < Indicates sample contains less than the analytical method limit of detection

LEAD TCLP SAMPLE INVENTORY

SAMPLE # MATERIAL DESCRIPTION RESULTS

(PPM)

Old Fitness Representative materials of the building

ND

ND: None Detected

5.0 Conclusions & Recommendations:

The following summarizes the findings and recommendations resulting from the ACM & LBP surveys at the Site:

• Laboratory analysis of all suspect materials shows no asbestos containing materials at this location.

• Lead-based paint was not identified in the four samples collected by Apex, however based upon the age of the structures we would recommend OR- OSHA regulations be followed when impacting the lead-based paint.

• The results of this survey do not apply beyond the planned renovation described in this report. Materials located in areas not included in this inspection should be considered suspect. Should the scope of the renovation change during construction, or as previously inaccessible materials become exposed during demolition ODOT, and their representatives should be contacted to determine if materials contain asbestos or for further sampling.

Building materials should be assumed to contain asbestos unless testing shows otherwise.

This Survey Report was prepared by Tulla R. Stocker, AHERA License Numbers 45537IR, 45526DR, 45557PR, 45569SR and Lead Risk Assessor 1062-Indv and Jose Godinez AHERA Inspector number 1085.

__________Jose Godinez_________ ____02/08/23___________ Signature Date

APPENDIX A

Photographs

The blue sheet floor and yellow mastic in the office area of the south unit tested negative for asbestos

The gray cove base and mastic in the office area of the south unit tested negative for asbestos

The brown cove base and mastic in the office area of the south unit tested negative for asbestos.

The yellow carpet mastic in the office area of the south unit tested negative for asbestos

The blue cove base and mastic in the entrance of the north unit tested negative for asbestos

The black sheet floor and mastic in the restroom of the north unit tested negative

The white sheet floor and yellow mastic in the locker room of the north unit tested negative for asbestos

The yellow mastic under the faux flooring in the upstairs office of the north unit tested negative for asbestos

The 2’ x 4’ drop ceiling tile in the upstairs office of the north unit tested negative

The exterior aggregate wall and foam joint filler on the exterior of the building tested negative for asbestos

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY REPORTS

Attn:

Customer Project:

Reference #: Date: 1/30/2023

Analysis and Method

Discussion

Qualifications

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Materials Characterization - Bulk Asbestos Analysis Laboratory Analysis Report - Polarized Light

Apex Environmental Consulting Tulla Stocker

P.O.Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070 Old Fitness

CBR23010534

Summary of polarizing light microscopy (PLM / Stereomicroscopy bulk asbestos analysis) using the methods described in 40CFR Part 763

Appendix E to Subpart E (Interim and EPA 600 / R-93 / 116 (Improved). The sample is first viewed with the aid of stereomicroscopy. Numerous liquid slide preparations are created for analysis under the polarized microscope where identifications and quantifications are preformed. Calibrated liquid refractive oils are used as liquid mouting medium. These oils are used for identification (dispersion staining). A calibrated visual estimation is reported, should any asbestiform mineral be present. Other techniques such as acid washing are used in conjugation with refractive oils for detection of smaller quantities of asbestos. All asbestos percentages are based on calibrated visual estimation traceable to NIST standards for regulated of asbestos. Traceability to measurement and calibration is achieved by using known amounts and types of asbestos from standards where analyst and laboratory accuracy are measured. As little as 0.001% asbestos can be detected in favorable samples, while detection in unfavorable samples may approach the detection limit of 0.50% (well above the laboratory definition of trace).

Vermiculite containing samples may have trace amounts of actinolite-tremolite, where not found be PLM should be analyzed using TEM methods and / or water separation techniques. Suspected actinolite/vermiculite presence will be indicated through the sample comment section of this report.

Fibrous talc containing samples may even contain a related asbestos fiber known as anthophyllite. Under certain conditions the same fiber may actually contain both talc and anthophyllite (a phenomenon called intergrowth). Again, TEM detection methods are recommended. CA Labs PLM report comments will denote suspected amounts of asbestiform anthophyllite with talc, where further analysis is recommended.

Some samples (floor tiles, surfacings, etc.) may contain fibers too small to be detectable by PLM analysis and should be analyzed by TEM bulk protocols.

A "trace asbestos" will be reported if the analyst observes far less than 1% asbestos. CA Labs defines "trace asbestos" as a few fibers detected by the analyst in several preparations and will indicate as such under these circumstances.

Quantification of <1% will actually be reported as <=1% (allowable variance close to 1% is high). Such results are ideal for point counting, and the technique is mandatory for friable samples (NESHAP, Nov. 1990 and clarification letter 8 May 1991) under 1% percent asbestos and the "trace asbestos". In order to make all initial PLM reports issued from CA Labs NESHAP compliant, all <1% asbestos results (except floor tiles) will be point counted at no additional charge.

CA Labs is accredited by the National Voluntary Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for selected test methods for airborne fiber analysis (TEM), and for bulk asbestos fiber analysis (PLM). All analysts have a college degree in a natural science (geology, biology, or environmental science) or are recognized by a state professional board in one these disciplines .Extensive in-house training programs are used to augment education background of the analyst. The group leader of polarized light has received supplemental McCrone Research training for asbestos identification. This report is not covered by the scope of AIHA accreditation. Analysis performed at CA Labs, LLC 12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809.

Labs

A

C

Overview of Project Sample Material Containing Asbestos

Customer Project: Old Fitness CA Labs Project #: CBR23010534

No Asbestos Detected.

Glossary of abbreviations (non-asbestos fibers and non-fibrous minerals):

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Sample # Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

List of Affected Building

Material Types ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay)

This report relates to the items tested. This report is not to be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA LAP, LLC, or any other agency of the federal government. This report may not be reproduced except in full without written permission from CA Labs. These results are submitted pursuant to CA Labs' current terms and sale, condition of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitations of liability provisions and no responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Unless notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, CA Labs will store the samples for a period of ninety (90) days before discarding. A shipping or handling fee may be assessed for the return of any samples.

Labs

A

Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization

Customer Info: Attn: Customer Project:

1/30/2023

2 day 1/26/2023

Phone # 1/22/2023

Fax #

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Tulla Stocker CA Labs Project #:

Apex Environmental Consulting Old Fitness CBR23010534

P.O.Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

503-682-9737 Date Of Sampling:

503-682-0525 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

NB-01 01-1

White Surfaced White

Compound N None Detected

100% qu, pe, bi, ca

NB-02 02-1

White Surfaced White

Compound N None Detected

100% qu, pe, bi, ca

NB-03 03-1 Blue Linoleum Y None Detected 10% fg 90% qu, ma

03-2 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-04 04-1 Blue Linoleum Y None Detected 10% fg 90% qu, ma

04-2 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-05 05-1 Gray Cove Base Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Sidney Pinkerton Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

1/30/2023

2 day 1/26/2023

Phone # 1/22/2023

Fax #

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Tulla Stocker CA Labs Project #:

Apex Environmental Consulting Old Fitness CBR23010534

P.O.Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

503-682-9737 Date Of Sampling:

503-682-0525 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

05-2 Brown Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-06 06-1 Gray Cove Base Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

06-2 Brown Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-07 07-1 Black Cove Base Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

07-2 White Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-08 08-1 Black Cove Base Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

08-2 White Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Sidney Pinkerton Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

1/30/2023

2 day 1/26/2023

Phone # 1/22/2023

Fax #

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Tulla Stocker CA Labs Project #:

Apex Environmental Consulting Old Fitness CBR23010534

P.O.Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

503-682-9737 Date Of Sampling:

503-682-0525 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

NB-09 09-1 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-10 10-1 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-11 11-1 Blue Cove Base Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

11-2 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-11A 11A-1 Tan CMU Y None Detected

100% qu, ma, ca, ot

NB-12 12-1 Blue Cove Base Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

12-2 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Sidney Pinkerton Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

1/30/2023

2 day 1/26/2023

Phone # 1/22/2023

Fax #

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Tulla Stocker CA Labs Project #:

Apex Environmental Consulting Old Fitness CBR23010534

P.O.Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

503-682-9737 Date Of Sampling:

503-682-0525 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

NB-12A 12A-1 Tan CMU Y None Detected

100% qu, ma, ca, ot

NB-13 13-1 Black Cove Base Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

13-2 White Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-14 14-1 Black Cove Base Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

14-2 White Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-15 15-1 Black Vinyl Floor Tile Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

15-2 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, bi

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Sidney Pinkerton Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

1/30/2023

2 day 1/26/2023

Phone # 1/22/2023

Fax #

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Tulla Stocker CA Labs Project #:

Apex Environmental Consulting Old Fitness CBR23010534

P.O.Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

503-682-9737 Date Of Sampling:

503-682-0525 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

NB-16 16-1 Black Vinyl Floor Tile Y None Detected 100% qu, ma

16-2 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, bi

NB-17 17-1 Tan Linoleum Y None Detected 20% ce 80% qu, ma

NB-18 18-1 Tan Linoleum Y None Detected 20% ce 80% qu, ma

NB-19 19-1 Gray Linoleum Y None Detected 20% ce 80% qu, ma

19-2 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, bi

NB-20 20-1 Gray Linoleum Y None Detected 20% ce 80% qu, ma

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Sidney Pinkerton Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

1/30/2023

2 day 1/26/2023

Phone # 1/22/2023

Fax #

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Tulla Stocker CA Labs Project #:

Apex Environmental Consulting Old Fitness CBR23010534

P.O.Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

503-682-9737 Date Of Sampling:

503-682-0525 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

20-2 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, bi

NB-21 21-1 Tan Flooring Y None Detected 80% ce 20% qu, ma

21-2 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, bi

NB-22 22-1 Tan Flooring Y None Detected 80% ce 20% qu, ma

22-2 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, bi

NB-23 23-1 Tan Ceiling Tile Y None Detected

15% fg

40% ce

45% qu, pe, bi, ma

NB-24 24-1 Tan Ceiling Tile Y None Detected

15% fg

40% ce

45% qu, pe, bi, ma

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Sidney Pinkerton Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

1/30/2023

2 day 1/26/2023

Phone # 1/22/2023

Fax #

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Tulla Stocker CA Labs Project #:

Apex Environmental Consulting Old Fitness CBR23010534

P.O.Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

503-682-9737 Date Of Sampling:

503-682-0525 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

NB-25 25-1 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-26 26-1 Yellow Mastic Y None Detected 100% qu, ma, bi

NB-27 27-1 Gray Sealant Y None Detected 5% ce 95% qu, ma, bi

NB-28 28-1 Gray Sealant Y None Detected 5% ce 95% qu, ma, bi

NB-29 29-1 Gray CMU Y None Detected

100% qu, ma, ca, ot

NB-30 30-1 Gray CMU Y None Detected

100% qu, ma, ca, ot

NB-31 31-1 Gray Sealant Y None Detected 5% ce 95% qu, ma, bi

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Sidney Pinkerton Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

1/30/2023

2 day 1/26/2023

Phone # 1/22/2023

Fax #

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

NVLAP #200772-0

TDSHS #300370

CDPHE #AL-18111

LELAP #03069

Tulla Stocker CA Labs Project #:

Apex Environmental Consulting Old Fitness CBR23010534

P.O.Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

503-682-9737 Date Of Sampling:

503-682-0525 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type

/ percent

31-2 Black Foam Y None Detected 100% ot

NB-32 32-1 Gray Sealant Y None Detected 5% ce 95% qu, ma, bi

32-2 Black Foam Y None Detected 100% ot

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Sidney Pinkerton Senior Analyst

Analyst Alicia Stretz

Labs

A

CA Labs Dedicated to Quality

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex Blvd Ste 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

LELAP #03069

Analysis performed at CA Labs, LLC. 12232 Industriplex Blvd, Suite 32, Baton Rouge, LA 70809. Phone 225-751-5632

Labs

A

Laboratory Report:

Analysis of Lead in Bulk Matrices by Direct Aspiration Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry

(FAAS)

DATE 01/27/2023

Apex Environmental Consulting

P.O. Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070

Client Project Name/Number: Old Fitness

Laboratory Project Number: CBR23010535

Attention: Tulla Stocker

Please find enclosed the analytical results for samples received by the laboratory on 01/26/2023. These results relate only to the samples included in this report. All reported results conform to the requirements of the laboratory’s accrediting agency for the method utilized and to the laboratory’s internal Quality

Assurance program unless otherwise noted.

This report may only be reproduced in its entirety.

Please contact laboratory management directly with any questions concerning this report.

Sincerely, Christopher Williams

Technical Manager

CA Labs LLC

Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

LELAP #03069

Laboratory Report:

Analysis of Lead in Bulk Matrices

Analysis Method: EPA SW-846 Method 7000B: Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry

Preparation Method: All samples are prepared in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 3050: “Hotplate” method

Client Information:

Apex Environmental

P.O. Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070

Client Project:

Old Fitness

CA Labs Project #:

CBR23010535

Date: 01/27/2023

Phone: 503-682-9737 Turnaround Time: 2 day Samples Received: 01/26/2023

Fax: Attn: Tulla Stocker Purchase Order #:

This method is not accredited by NVLAP Approved Signatories:

___________ LELAP Lab ID #03069 _____________ ____________

Sidney Pinkerton Christopher Williams Alicia Stretz

Analyst Page 2 of 3 Laboratory Director Senior Analyst

Analysis performed at CA Labs, LLC. 12232 Industriplex Blvd, Suite 32, Baton Rouge, LA 70809. Phone 225-751-5632

Date Collected: 01/22/2023 Date Prepared: 01/26/2023 Date Analyzed: 01/26/2023

Batch ID: 012623

Sample Results:

Sample ID: Sample Description: Matrix: Result (PPM): Result (Percent Weight): Qualifiers:

NBP-01 Shower P <91.49 <0.0091 N/A

NBP-02 Office P <86.06 <0.0086 N/A

NBP-03 Warehouse P <248.14 <0.0248 N/A

NBP-04 Upstairs P <91.32 <0.0091 N/A

*Qualifier Key: 1 – Sample non-homogeneous; 2 – Sample wet, drying required; 3 – Sample concentration outside of calibration range, dilution required

Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

LELAP #03069

Laboratory Report:

Analysis of Lead in Bulk Matrices

Analysis Method: EPA SW-846 Method 7000B: Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry

Preparation Method: All samples are prepared in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 3050: “Hotplate” method

Client Information:

Apex Environmental

P.O. Box 1445

Wilsonville, OR 97070

Client Project:

Old Fitness

CA Labs Project #:

CBR23010535

Date: 01/27/2023

Phone: 503-682-9737 Turnaround Time: 2 day Samples Received: 01/26/2023

Fax: Attn: Tulla Stocker Purchase Order #:

This method is not accredited by NVLAP Approved Signatories:

___________ LELAP Lab ID #03069 _____________ ____________

Sidney Pinkerton Christopher Williams Alicia Stretz

Analyst Page 3 of 3 Laboratory Director Senior Analyst

Analysis performed at CA Labs, LLC. 12232 Industriplex Blvd, Suite 32, Baton Rouge, LA 70809. Phone 225-751-5632

Quality Control

Sample ID: Result

(PPM):

Expected

(PPM):

REC:

Lower

Limit:

Upper

Limit:

RPD: RPD

Limit:

Method Blank -0.103 --- --- -0.2 PPM 0.2 PPM --- ---

Laboratory Control

Sample

4809.05 4,490 107.11 80% 120% --- ---

Duplicate (LCS) 4837.91 4809.05 --- --- --- 0.60 25%

Matrix Spike 5.639 5.00 112.78 75% 125% --- ---

February 10, 2023

Tulla Stocker Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

13100 SW Westfall Road Sherwood, OR 97140

The analytical data provided relates directly to the samples received by ALS Environmental and for only the analyses requested. Results are expressed as "as received" unless otherwise noted.

QC sample results for this data met EPA or laboratory specifications except as noted in the Case Narrative or as noted with qualifiers in the QC batch information. Should this laboratory report need to be reproduced, it should be reproduced in full unless written approval has been obtained by ALS Environmental. Samples will be disposed in 30 days unless storage arrangements are made.

If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to call me.

Sincerely, ALS Environmental received 2 sample(s) on Feb 07, 2023 for the analysis presented in the following report.

Laboratory Results for: Newberg

Dear Tulla Stocker, Work Order: HS23020301

Generated By: DAYNA.FISHER

Andy C. Neir

10450 Stancliff Rd. Suite 210 Houston, TX 77099 T: +1 281 530 5656 F: +1 281 530 5887 alsglobal.com

Client: Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

Work Order: HS23020301 Project: Newberg SAMPLE SUMMARY

Lab Samp ID Client Sample ID Collection DateMatrix TagNo Date Received Hold

HS23020301-01 28-Jan-2023 00:00 07-Feb-2023 11:00V5 Solid

HS23020301-02 28-Jan-2023 00:00 07-Feb-2023 11:00DLP Fitness Solid

ALS Houston, US 10-Feb-23Date:

Client: CASE NARRATIVE

Work Order:

Newberg Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

Project:

HS23020301

Metals by Method SW1311/6020

Batch ID: 189555 Sample ID: HS23011149-01MS

MS and MSD are for an unrelated sample•

Client:

Project:

Sample ID:

Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

Newberg V5

WorkOrder:

Lab ID:

Collection Date:

HS23020301

HS23020301-01

28-Jan-2023 00:00 Matrix:Solid

ANALYTICAL REPORT

ANALYSES RESULT REPORT

LIMIT

DILUTION

FACTORUNITS

DATE

ANALYZEDQUAL

TCLP METALS BY SW6020A Method:SW1311/6020 Analyst: JCLeache:SW1311 / 08-Feb-2023 Prep:SW3010A / 09-Feb-2023

1mg/L 10-Feb-2023 00:30Lead 0.0500ND

10-Feb-23Date: ALS Houston, US

Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.

Sample ID:

Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

Newberg DLP Fitness

WorkOrder:

Lab ID:

Collection Date:

HS23020301

HS23020301-02

28-Jan-2023 00:00 Matrix:Solid

ANALYTICAL REPORT

ANALYSES RESULT REPORT

LIMIT

DILUTION

FACTORUNITS

DATE

ANALYZEDQUAL

TCLP METALS BY SW6020A Method:SW1311/6020 Analyst: JCLeache:SW1311 / 08-Feb-2023 Prep:SW3010A / 09-Feb-2023

1mg/L 10-Feb-2023 00:32Lead 0.0500ND

10-Feb-23Date: ALS Houston, US

Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.

Weight / Prep Log

HS23020301

Newberg Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

WorkOrder:

Project:

Client:

Batch ID:189473

Method: TCLP METALS EXTRACTION BY SW1311 1311LM EXTPrep Code:

Start Date: 07 Feb 2023 15:00 End Date: 08 Feb 2023 08:00

ContainerSample ID Sample Wt/Vol

Final Volume

Prep Factor

HS23020301-01 25 (grams) Ziplock Bag500 (mL) 20 HS23020301-02 25 (grams) Ziplock Bag500 (mL) 20

Batch ID:189555

Method: TCLP LEACHATE DIGESTION BY SW3010A 3010A_TCLPPrep Code:

Start Date: 09 Feb 2023 14:00 End Date: 09 Feb 2023 18:00

ContainerSample ID Sample Wt/Vol

Final Volume

Prep Factor

HS23020301-01 1 (mL) Ziplock Bag10 (mL) 10 HS23020301-02 1 (mL) Ziplock Bag10 (mL) 10

10-Feb-23Date: ALS Houston, US

Newberg Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

WorkOrder:

Project:

HS23020301

DATES REPORT

Collection Date Prep Date Analysis DateClient Samp IDSample ID Leachate Date DF

Batch ID: 189555 ( 0 ) Test Name : TCLP METALS BY SW6020A Matrix: Solid

09 Feb 2023 14:00 10 Feb 2023 00:30HS23020301-01 28 Jan 2023 00:00 08 Feb 2023 08:00 1V5

09 Feb 2023 14:00 10 Feb 2023 00:32HS23020301-02 28 Jan 2023 00:00 08 Feb 2023 08:00 1DLP Fitness

Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

Newberg

WorkOrder: HS23020301

QC BATCH REPORT

Batch ID: 189555 ( 0 ) Instrument: ICPMS06 Method: TCLP METALS BY SW6020A

Sample ID: MBLKT2-189234 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 22:37

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117694 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MBLK

Client ID:

Lead ND 0.0500

Sample ID: MBLKT4-189424 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 22:41

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117696 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MBLK

Client ID:

Lead ND 0.0500

Sample ID: MBLKT6-189177 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 22:45

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117698 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MBLK

Client ID:

Lead ND 0.0500

Sample ID: MBLKT8-189293 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 22:49

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117700 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MBLK

Client ID:

Lead ND 0.0500

Sample ID: MBLKT7-189180 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 22:47

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117699 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MBLK

Client ID:

Lead ND 0.0500

Sample ID: MBLKT5-189473 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 22:43

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117697 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MBLK

Client ID:

Lead ND 0.0500

ALS Houston, US Date: 10-Feb-23

Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

Newberg

WorkOrder: HS23020301

QC BATCH REPORT

Batch ID: 189555 ( 0 ) Instrument: ICPMS06 Method: TCLP METALS BY SW6020A

Sample ID: MBLKT3-189423 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 22:39

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117695 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MBLK

Client ID:

Lead ND 0.0500

Sample ID: MBLKT1-189231 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 22:35

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117693 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MBLK

Client ID:

Lead ND 0.0500

Sample ID: MBLK-189555 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 22:33

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117692 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MBLK

Client ID:

Lead ND 0.00500

Sample ID: LCS-189555 Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 22:51

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117701 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

LCS

Client ID:

Lead 0.04836 0.05 0 96.7 80 - 1200.00500

Sample ID: HS23011149-01MS Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 23:08

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117708 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MS

Client ID:

Lead 1866 0.5 1925 -11800 80 - 120 SEO 0.0500

Sample ID: HS23011149-01MSD Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 09-Feb-2023 23:10

Run ID: ICPMS06_427673 SeqNo: 7117709 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

MSD

Client ID:

Lead 1902 0.5 1925 -4600 80 - 120 1866 1.92 20 SEO 0.0500

Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

Newberg

WorkOrder: HS23020301

QC BATCH REPORT

Batch ID: 189555 ( 0 ) Instrument: ICPMS06 Method: TCLP METALS BY SW6020A

Sample ID: HS23011149-01PDS Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 10-Feb-2023 12:05

Run ID: ICPMS06_427759 SeqNo: 7118463 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 1000

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %RPD

RPD

Limit Qual

PDS

Client ID:

Lead 2965 1000 2013 95.2 75 - 12550.0

Sample ID: HS23011149-01SD Units: mg/L Analysis Date: 10-Feb-2023 12:03

Run ID: ICPMS06_427759 SeqNo: 7118462 PrepDate: 09-Feb-2023 DF: 5000

Analyte SPK ValPQLResult SPK Ref

Value %REC Control

Limit RPD Ref

Value %D %D Limit Qual

SD

Client ID:

Lead 2003 2013 0.488 10250

The following samples were analyzed in this batch: HS23020301-01 HS23020301-02

QUALIFIERS,

ACRONYMS, UNITS

Client:

Project:

WorkOrder:

Apex Environmental Consulting Services Inc.

Newberg

HS23020301

Qualifier Description

* Value exceeds Regulatory Limit a Not accredited

B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above the Reporting Limit

E Value above quantitation range

H Analyzed outside of Holding Time

J Analyte detected below quantitation limit

M Manually integrated, see raw data for justification n Not offered for accreditation

ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

O Sample amount is > 4 times amount spiked

P Dual Column results percent difference > 40%

R RPD above laboratory control limit

S Spike Recovery outside laboratory control limits

U Analyzed but not detected above the MDL/SDL

Acronym Description DCS Detectability Check Study

DUP Method Duplicate

LCS Laboratory Control Sample

LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate

MBLK Method Blank

MDL Method Detection Limit

MQL Method Quantitation Limit

MS Matrix Spike

MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate

PDS Post Digestion Spike

PQL Practical Quantitaion Limit

SD Serial Dilution

SDL Sample Detection Limit

TRRP Texas Risk Reduction Program

Unit Reported Description Date

CERTIFICATIONS,ACCREDITATIONS & LICENSES

Agency Number Expire Date

Arkansas 22-041-0 27-Mar-2023

California 2919 2022-2023 30-Apr-2023

Dept of Defense L21-682 31-Dec-2023

Florida E87611-36 30-Jun-2023

Illinois 2000322022-9 09-May-2023

Kansas E-10352; 2022-2023 31-Jul-2023

Kentucky 123043, 2022-2023 30-Apr-2023

Louisiana 03087, 2022-2023 30-Jun-2023

Maryland 343, 2022-2023 30-Jun-2023

North Carolina 624-2023 31-Dec-2023

North Dakota R-193 2022-2023 30-Apr-2023

Oklahoma 2022-141 31-Aug-2023

Texas T104704231-22-29 30-Apr-2023

Utah TX026932022-13 31-Jul-2023

Corey Grandits

07-Feb-2023 11:00Date/Time Received:HS23020301

Apex Sherwood OR

Work Order ID:

Client Name:

Sample Receipt Checklist

Received by:

Shipping container/cooler in good condition?

Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?

Custody seals intact on sample bottles?

Chain of custody present?

Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?

Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?

Samples in proper container/bottle?

Sample containers intact?

Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?

All samples received within holding time?

Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance?

Temperature(s)/Thermometer(s):

Cooler(s)/Kit(s):

Date/Time sample(s) sent to storage:

Water - VOA vials have zero headspace?

Water - pH acceptable upon receipt?

pH adjusted?

pH adjusted by:

Login Notes:

No Not Present

Yes No Not Present

Yes No Not Present

Yes No

Yes No

Yes

No

Yes No Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

20.2UC/19.7C IR31

Envolop 2/7/23

Yes No No VOA vials submitted

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Collection time missing from COC and container labels. Light weight material, limited sample received.

Completed By: /S/ Corey Grandits Date/TimeeSignatureDate/TimeeSignature

08-Feb-2023 15:3307-Feb-2023 15:26

FedExS Carrier name:Matrices:

Reviewed by: /S/ Andy C. Neir

Client Contacted: Date Contacted: Person Contacted:

Contacted By: Regarding:

Comments:

Corrective Action:

Yes

NoYesVOA/TX1005/TX1006 Solids in hermetically sealed vials? Not Present

Samplers name present on COC?

Yes

No

1 Page(s)

APPENDIX C

CERTIFICATIONS

Jose Godinez

May 25, 2022

ON-4644-9317-052522

25-May-2022

25-May-2023

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) http://www.tcpdf.org