1-RFQ 2026-001 Qualification Package.pdf

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

RFQ 2026-001

Waco Lake Study

Issue Date: January 12, 2026 Questions Due: February 19, 2026, 5:00 P.M. CT

Closing Date & Time: March 11, 2026, 2:00 P.M. CT Opening Date & Time: March 11, 2026, 2:01 P.M. CT

For Information Contact:

Melanie Wade, Purchasing Agent, 254-750-8098, or melaniew@wacotx.gov

RFQ Opening Location:

Purchasing Services Office, 1415 N. 4th Street, Waco, Texas via Zoom Video Conferencing Only (Please see Page 3)

Zoom & Dial-In Information:

Please see Page 3

Purchasing Services Post Office Box 2570 Waco, Texas 76702-2570 Telephone 254 / 750-8060

Fax 254 / 750-8063 waco-texas.com

RFQ 2025-001 Page 1 mailto:%20XXX@wacotx.gov mailto:melaniew@wacotx.gov http://www.waco-texas.com/

EUNA / BONFIRE ELECTRONIC BIDDING

The City of Waco is transitioning to Electronic Bidding, Proposals and Qualification (RFB/RFP & RFQ) submissions. These requests will be managed through the new City’s Data base system, EUNA / Bonfire.

We ask vendors to register with EUNA / Bonfire to access and respond to any advertisement for bids and services required by the City. Registration is secure and user friendly. Vendors can register at the link below. Once registered, vendors will be able to:

• Register with the City of Waco.

• Receive notifications for bids and services requests from the City.

• Stay updated on changes, addendums, open solicitations.

• Submit bids and proposals electronically.

• Vendors can inquire about the details and requirements of various bidding opportunities.

The City will still accept bids and proposals by mail or drop off. Notifications of changes, addendums and updates will also be available on the City’s website as well as other media outlets the City uses for solicitations.

The City appreciates your participation. If you have questions during the electronic bid/proposal process, please contact the issuing buyer, whose contact information can be found in the solicitation document. You can also contact EUNA / Bonfire with registration or customer support issues.

Website links to assist you: waco-texas.bonfirehub.com/login

RFQ 2025-001 Page 2 https://waco-texas.bonfirehub.com/login

BID NUMBER:

DATE:

TIME: CENTRAL

QUICK LINK:

MEETING ID:

DIAL IN NUMBER:

PASS CODE:

ADDITONAL

INFORMATION:

BID NUMBER:

DATE:

TIME: CENTRAL

QUICK LINK:

MEETING ID:

DIAL IN NUMBER:

PASS CODE:

ADDITONAL

INFORMATION:

PRE BID/ PROPOSAL

BID/ PROPOSAL OPENING

ZOOM ACCESS INSTRUCTIONS & ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Rev. 1

RFQ 2025-001 Page 3 https://wacotx.zoomgov.com/j/1612354003?

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Register Interest Form I. Schedule for Solicitation II. Contact with City of Waco III. Definitions IV. Requested Services V. Statement of Qualifications VI. Evaluation of Submittals & Award of Contract

Appendices A. Scope of Services

(1) Scope of Services

(2) Additional Background, Information or Requirements

(3) Exhibits

B. Contract Requirements

(1) City of Waco General Terms and Conditions

(2) Additional Terms for Services

(3) Insurance & Indemnification Requirements

(4) Sales Tax Information

(5) House Bill 89 Energy Form

(6) House Bill 89 Firearms Form

(7) House Bill 89 Israel Form

(8) House Bill 1295 Information Sheet

(9) Foreign Terrorist Organization Form

(10) Protest Procedure

(11) Registration with the Texas Secretary of State

(12) W-9 Taxpayer Identification Form

(13) Electronic Funds Transfer Authorization (EFT Form)

C. Forms to Complete and Return

(1) Submission of Proposal and Acknowledgment of Addenda

(2) Business Identification Form

(3) Conflict of Interest Questionnaire (CIQ form)

(4) Disclosure of Relationships with City Council/Officers (City Charter)

(5) HUB Business Certification

(6) Litigation Disclosure

(7) Certification Regarding Debarment

(8) Non-collusion Affidavit

(9) Texas Public Information Act

(10) Drug Free Workplace

RFQ 2025-001 Page 4

RFQ No. 2026-001

Waco Lake Study

Please Register for Notification

REGISTER INTEREST

You have received a copy of the above-described Request document. If you would like to register your interest in this project so that you will receive any future notices or addenda concerning the project, please fill in the information requested below and fax this page to 254-750-8063. You may also scan this page and email to: melaniew@wacotx.gov.

Company/Firm:

Name of Contact Person(s):

Email(s):

Telephone:

Fax:

Mailing Address:

It is your responsibility to complete and return this form to the City. Failure to do so will result in your not receiving notices and addenda related to this project from the City of Waco.

Notices and addenda are posted on the City’s website and can be accessed at: waco-texas.com/bids

City of Waco Purchasing Services Post Office Box 2570

Waco, Texas 76702-2570 Telephone 254 / 750-8060

Fax 254 / 750-8063 waco-texas.com

RFQ 2025-001 Page 5 mailto:melaniew@wacotx.gov.

http://www.waco-texas.com/purchasing-rules.asp http://www.waco-texas.com/purchasing-rules.asp http://www.waco-texas.com/

I. SCHEDULE FOR SOLICITATION

The proposed schedule of events is tentative and may be modified throughout the selection process at the discretion of the City of Waco.

• Issuance of the RFQ January 12, 2026

• Question deadline 5:00 P.M. (CT) February 19, 2026

• Statement of Qualifications (SOQs), 2:00 P.M. (CT) March 11, 2026

• Opening of SOQ Submittals 2:01 P.M. Via Zoom March 11, 2026

• Evaluation of the SOQs / Interviews March/April, 2026

• Establish final ranking of submitters April/May, 2026

• Notify submitters of award recommendation April/May, 2026

Tentatively, the final selection decision will be made, and submitters will be notified of an award recommendation by April/May 2026. This schedule is subject to change by the City.

II. CONTACT WITH CITY OF WACO

The contact person for this solicitation process is: Melanie Wade, Purchasing Agent who can be reached at:

Email: melaniew@wacotx.gov Telephone: (254) 750-8098 Fax: (254) 750-8063

Questions concerning the solicitation can be submitted through the City of Waco’s Bonfire portal at waco-texas.bonfirehub.com/login (preferred) or by email to the contact person listed above.

Official Address (if needed) - City of Waco Purchasing Services

Attn: Melanie Wade, Purchasing Agent 1415 North 4th Street Waco, Texas 76707

Contact someone other than the Purchasing Agent listed above, or his/her designated representative at the City of Waco concerning this solicitation may be grounds for removal from consideration.

Interpretation, modification, corrections, or changes to the solicitation documents will be made by addenda issued by the City of Waco. Addenda will also be made available through the City of Waco’s Bonfire portal at waco-texas.bonfirehub.com/login or the City of Waco Website at waco-texas.com/bids. Interested professional service providers are encouraged to return the Register Interest form on the previous page.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 6 mailto:melaniew@wacotx.gov https://waco-texas.bonfirehub.com/login https://www.waco-texas.com/Departments/Purchasing/Open-Bid-Opportunities

III. DEFINITIONS

The following definitions apply to this document and the transaction between the City and the selected submitter unless otherwise designated in the context. Terms, which are singular, may include multiple, where applicable and when in the best interests of the City:

(1) “City” means and refers to the City of Waco, Texas.

(2) “Company” or “Firm” means and refers to any submitter, whether such submitter be a sole proprietor, corporation, company, partnership, company, or any other entity legally defined or recognized under the laws of the State of Texas.

(3) “Contract documents” include the RFQ and all of the Appendices attached to the RFQ.

(4) “Day” means a calendar day unless otherwise specified defined.

(5) “Project” means subject matter for which professional services are sought.

(6) “Project Review Committee” means a committee established by the City to review the qualifications. The Committee may be composed of City of Waco staff, City Councilmembers, or their designees, or other individuals selected to serve on the committee by the City.

(7) “RFQ” means and refers to this Request for Qualifications.

(8) “Selected Firm” means the firm who is selected by the City and to whom the City Council/City

Manager awards a contract for the professional services requested in this solicitation.

(9) “Selected submittal” means and refers to the Statement of Qualifications submitted by the

Selected Firm.

(10) “Solicitation” means an RFQ issued by the City Waco seeking services described in the document.

(11) “SOQ” means Statement of Qualifications.

(12) “Submission” or “Submittal” refers to a response to the RFQ which is a Statement of

Qualifications of the submitter.

(13) “Submitter” means a firm submits a Statement of Qualifications in response to this RFQ.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 7

IV. REQUESTED SERVICES/PRODUCTS

A. Professional Services Requested:

(1) Professional Engineering Services Requested. The City of Waco has issued this Request for Qualifications to select a consulting engineering firm to perform a comprehensive biological/chemical study on Lake Waco and use the results of the study to provide a sealed proposal to the City of Waco for improvements to the city’s water treatment process.

(2) A detailed scope of services is attached in Appendix A.

(3) The selected firm will need to complete the study and reports within 18 months of Notice to Proceed.

(4) The City of Waco needs to get an updated assessment of the water quality and other parameters within Waco Lake to forecast the future of the lake’s health and recommendations to improve the water quality. Using the lake study to provide recommendations to the City of Waco for changes in their water treatment process based on the study.

(5) A digital version of this document can be obtained from the City of Waco’s Bonfire portal at waco-texas.bonfirehub.com/login or the City of Waco Website at waco-texas.com/bids.

B. Terms Conditions & Requirements

In addition to the description of the services, the attached Appendices include the City’s Contract Requirements.

C. Reservations by City:

The City of Waco reserves the right to reject any and all submittals. The issuance of this solicitation does not obligate the City to contract for expressed or implied services. The City of Waco will not reimburse submitters for any costs incurred during the preparation or submittal of qualifications to this solicitation.

(1) Furthermore, the City expressly reserves the right to:

(a) Waive any defect, irregularity, or informality in any submittal or procedure.

(b) Extend the solicitation closing time and date.

(c) Reissue this solicitation in a different form or context.

(d) Procure any item by other allowable means.

(e) Waive minor deviations from specifications, conditions, terms, or provisions of the solicitation, if it is determined that waiver of the minor deviations improves or enhances the City’s business interests under the solicitation; and/or

(f) Extend any contract when most advantageous to the City, as set forth in this solicitation.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 8 http://www.waco-texas.com/bids.asp

V. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS (SOQ)

A. Submission of Information:

Submitters are cautioned that it is each submitter’s sole responsibility to submit information related to the evaluation categories, and the City is under no obligation to solicit such information if it is not included with the SOQ. Failure of a submitter to submit such information may cause an adverse impact on the evaluation of the specific SOQ.

B. Submitter Review of RFQ:

Submitters are responsible for examining and being familiar with all terms, conditions, provisions, and instructions of the RFQ and their responses. Failure to do so will be at the submitter’s risk and will not be a determinative factor when awarding the contract for services. Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in the RFQ.

C. Encouraging Competition:

The conditions, terms, provisions, and information of this RFQ are written to encourage maximum response to the RFQ. There is no intent to discriminate against any submitter but rather, to set a definite standard of professional quality and experience desired for this project.

D. Submission Contents:

Qualified firms should submit their qualifications through the City of Waco’s Bonfire portal at waco-texas.bonfirehub.com/login. Paper/ Physical submissions will still be accepted but must include one (1) electronic copy (CD or Flash Drive) and (1) original and four (4) copies of their statements of qualifications on 8 ½ x 11 paper. These must be received by the date set out above in the Schedule of Solicitation for a submitting firm to be considered:

(1) Title Page: Title page showing the RFQ subject, the RFQ number, the firm’s name;

the name, address and telephone number of the contact person, and the date of the

SOQ.

(2) Table of Contents

(3) Transmittal Letter: A signed letter of transmittal briefly stating the submitter’s understanding of the work to be done and a statement as to why the firm believes it to be the best qualified to perform the engagement.

(4) Detailed SOQ: The detailed SOQ should follow the order set out as follows:

(a) General Requirements: The purpose of the SOQ is to demonstrate the qualifications, competence, and capacity of the firm to undertake this project. It must also specify a project approach that will meet the requirements in the RFQ.

(b) License to Practice in the State of Texas: An affirmative statement should be included that the firm and all assigned professional staff are properly licensed or registered to practice in the state of Texas.

(c) Firm Qualifications and Experience: The submitter should state the size of the firm, the location of the office from which the work on this project is to be performed, the number and nature of the professional staff to be employed in this project on a full-time basis, and the number and nature of the staff to be so employed on a part-time basis.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 9

(d) Joint Venture or Consortium: If the submitter is a joint venture or consortium, the qualifications of each firm comprising the joint venture or consortium should be separately identified and the firm that is to serve as the principal should be noted, if applicable.

(e) Partner, Supervisory and Staff Qualifications and Experience: Identify the principal supervisory and management staff, including partners, managers, other supervisors, and specialists, who would be assigned to the project. If required, indicate whether each such person is registered or licensed to practice in Texas.

Provide information on the experience of each person, including information on relevant continuing professional education for the past three (3) years and membership in professional organizations relevant to the performance of this project. Identify the key personnel proposed for this project.

(f) Consultants and Firm Specialists: Consultants and firm specialists specifically proposed to work on the Waco Lake Study in response to this request for qualifications can only be changed with the express prior written permission of the City of Waco, which retains the right to approve or reject replacements. Partners, managers, other supervisory staff and specialists may be changed if those personnel leave the firm, are promoted or are assigned to another office. Other project personnel may be changed at the discretion of the submitter provided that replacements have substantially the same or better qualifications or experience. If key personnel become unavailable, the submitter shall propose replacements with substantially equal or better qualifications and obtain the City’s written approval. If an acceptable replacement cannot be provided, the City may deem the submittal non-responsive or terminate negotiations.

(g) Organizational Chart: Attach a one-page copy of your business organizational chart for the portion of your business that will be involved with this project, complete with names and titles. On the chart mark the people who will be involved in this project.

(h) Business Operation: If the submitter has operated under any other names within the last ten (10) years, provide those names.

(i) Ownership Changes: If submitter anticipates any mergers, transfer of organization ownership, management reorganization, or departure of key personnel within the next twelve (12) months, provide a description of what is anticipated and how that could impact work on this project if awarded the contract.

(5) Additional background information on no more than 15 pages. The page limit applies to this subsection only and excludes the title, page, table of contents, transmittal letter, and required attachments such as the organizational chart.

(a) Experience with Similar Projects: For the firm's office that will be assigned responsibility for the project, list the most significant projects (maximum - 5) performed in the last five years that are similar to the project described in this request for qualifications. These projects should be ranked on the basis of total staff hours. Indicate the scope of work, date, engagement partners, the original estimate and final cost, whether or not the work was completed within the specified schedule, and the name, email address, and telephone number of the principal client contact.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 10

(b) Primacy Agency Experience: The SOQ should list the firm’s experience working with the following government agencies as it pertains to a lake study and other aquatic assessments including permitting:

• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

• United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

• Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)

• Texas Water Development Board (TWDB)

• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

• United States Forest Service (USFS)

• Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD)

(c) Project Approach: The SOQ should set forth a work plan, including an explanation of the project methodology to be followed, to perform the required services. The work plan should include at a minimum; itemized tasks, resource requirements, specialized skills needed, special considerations, and possible challenges in completing the project. You should also identify the extent to which City of Waco staff will be involved in the project.

(d) Identification of Anticipated Potential Project Problems: The proposal should identify and describe any anticipated potential project problems, the firm's approach to resolving these problems and any special assistance that will be requested from the City of Waco.

(e) Project Schedule: A project schedule should be a part of the SOQ. This schedule should, at a minimum, indicate the amount of time in weeks that each phase and/or activity identified in Appendix A will take to complete. This information should be presented so the Review Committees can see how activities relate to each other as far as timing goes and also how long the project is expected to take, from contract execution to completion.

(f) References: Each response should provide the City with at least five (5) references for the firm (and any consultants) that the City may contact to discuss performance on other similar work. At least one of these references must be someone that the firm has worked with within the last 24 months. For each reference: project name and location; description of work; contract value of work performed by the firm or consultant and project value;

name, address, and telephone number of project owner/representative who oversaw project performance; dates (month/year) contract was issued and actually completed; and contract completion terms. References should be relevant to lake studies, drinking water treatability, reservoir monitoring, or related water quality and engineering work. If the City is unable to reach a reference after reasonable efforts, the City may consider other available performance information.

E. No Price Information The selection of a design firm under this RFQ shall be in accordance with Chapter 2254 of the Texas Government Code. Do not include any price information within the SOQ. SOQs containing any price information will be automatically disqualified.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 11

F. Completeness of Submission:

(1) Proposers are responsible for examining and being familiar with all specifications, drawings, standard provisions, instructions, and terms and conditions of the solicitation and their responses.

(2) The proposer must attach all required forms with each submission copy. Forms must be signed by a representative of the proposer authorized to bind the proposer contractually.

The proposer must include a statement identifying any exceptions to this RFQ or declaring that there are no exceptions taken to the RFQ.

G. Response Date and Location Responses to this solicitation must be received by 2:00 pm (Central Time) on March 11, 2026. The City prefers that vendors use the new Bonfire portal at waco-texas.bonfirehub.com/login , paper submissions will still be received at the address listed below via Delivery Services or Personal Delivery to:

Attn: Melanie Wade, Purchasing Agent 1415 North 4th Street Waco, Texas 76707

If using U.S. Mail, note that U.S. Mail is initially received at Waco City Hall and then delivered to the office of Purchasing Services by a City courier. That delivery may occur a day or more after being received at Waco City Hall. Allow additional time in advance of the proposal due date for U.S. Mail delivery. If the Purchasing Office has not received the proposal by the stated deadline, the proposal will be returned unopened.

All submissions shall be sent to the attention of the Purchasing Agent in a sealed envelope that is clearly marked on the outside as follows:

RFQ 2026-001

Waco Lake Study

Closing: 2:00pm (Central Time) on March 11, 2026

Submitters accept all risk of late delivery bids submissions regardless of instance or fault. A paper submission received after the submission deadline will not be considered and will be returned unopened to the submitter.

The City will NOT accept a submission by facsimile transmission (fax) or by electronic mail (email).

All submissions and accompanying documentation will become the property of the City.

H. Modifications to or Withdrawal of Submission:

Submissions cannot be modified after the submission deadline.

Submissions (in PAPER ONLY) may be modified prior to the deadline by providing a written notice to the Purchasing contact person at the address previously stated. To modify a submission prior to the submission deadline:

(1) Submit a written notice of the modification.

(2) The written modification may be submitted by electronic transmission (email) or personal delivery to the Purchasing Agent identified earlier in this document. The written modification

RFQ 2025-001 Page 12 must be received by the City prior to the closing time.

A submission may also be withdrawn (Bonfire vendor’s can withdrawal their own submission) by providing the notice in person by a representative of the submitter who can provide proof of his/her authority to act for the submitter. The representative will be required to execute a receipt reflecting the submission is being withdrawn.

I. Authorized Signature:

A SOQ must be manually signed by a person having authority to contractually bind the submitter. Any erasures or other changes must be initialed by the person authorized to sign the SOQ or others who are able to show evidence of authority to execute or sign or behalf of the submitter.

J. SOQ is an Indication of Ability to Perform Requested Services:

The SOQ submitted by a firm is an indication of the ability of the firm to perform the requested services.

K. Agreement; Exceptions:

(1) Submission of an SOQ indicates the submitter agrees to the terms, conditions, and other provisions contained in the RFQ, unless the submitter clearly and specifically presents in its proposal any exceptions to the terms, conditions, and other provisions contained in the RFQ.

(2) Exceptions presented in an SOQ are not to be considered incorporated into the contract between the City and the selected submitter unless and until the City agrees to accept such exceptions.

(3) The selected submitter must acknowledge and agree that the contract resulting from this RFQ includes the terms, conditions, and other provisions contained in the RFQ, the submittal provided in response to this RFQ (including any exceptions accepted by the City) which is acceptable to the City and is not in conflict or contravention of the RFQ, and any other documents mutually agreed upon by the City and the selected submitter.

(4) No oral statement of any person shall modify or otherwise change or affect the terms, conditions, or specifications stated in the RFQ or the resulting contract.

L. Cost to Develop Submission:

Costs for developing and assembling submissions in response to this solicitation are entirely the responsibility and obligation of the submitter and shall not be reimbursed in any manner by the City.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 13

VI. EVALUATION OF SUBMITTALS & AWARD OF CONTRACT

A. General Procedure:

The submitted SOQs will be initially reviewed and evaluated by a Project Review Committee. Each SOQ should be submitted as completely and accurately as possible.

The City reserves the right to request additional information or clarifications, oral discussions, or presentations in support of the submitted SOQ. The City also reserves the right to allow corrections of errors or omissions.

B. Evaluation Criteria:

Firms meeting the mandatory criteria below will have their SOQs evaluated for technical quality. A point formula will be used during the review and evaluation process by the Project Review Committee to score SOQs. The following represent the principal selection criteria:

(1) Mandatory Elements:

(a) The firm is licensed or registered to practice in the State of Texas (if the professional services involved require licensing or registration).

(b) The firm has no conflict of interest with regard to any other work performed by the firm for the City of Waco.

(c) The firm adheres to the instructions in this RFQ on preparing and submitting the SOQ, including submission of forms in Appendix C.

(2) Technical Quality: (Maximum Points - 100)

(a) Firm’s Expertise and Experience: (Maximum Points – 50)

1. The firm's past experience and performance on comparable projects

2. The quality of the firm's professional personnel to be assigned to the engagement and the quality of the firm's management support personnel to be available for technical consultation. Percent of time that will be spent on this project by key personnel (on a monthly basis).

3. Commitment to schedule and redundancy in staffing to ensure deadlines are met.

(b) Project Approach: (Maximum Points - 40)

1. Quality of the proposed work plan, including method and staff resources planned.

2. Identification of anticipated potential project problems.

3. Project Schedule

(c) Conformance with RFQ requirements: (Maximum Points - 10)

1. This includes, but is not limited to, whether forms listed herein were executed and returned as requested.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 14

C. Final Selection:

(1) The scoring of the SOQs by the Project Review Committee will be presented to the Director of Infrastructure Services, who will determine whether to schedule oral interviews with the top-rated firms.

(2) Based on all information and review, including oral interviews (if conducted), the Director of

Infrastructure Services shall establish the final ranking of the firms.

(3) The City shall then seek to negotiate a contract with the firm ranked first. If an agreement cannot be reached, efforts to negotiate a contract will then proceed with the firm ranked second. This process will be followed until a satisfactory contract can be negotiated.

D. Contract Award and Execution:

The final contract must be awarded and approved by the Waco City Council if the amount of the contract will exceed $100,000.00. If the contract is for less than that amount, depending on the amount, the contract may be executed by the City Manager, an Assistant City Manager, department head or director.

The Recipient, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 15

APPENDIX A

Scope of Services

(1) Scope of Services

(2) Additional Background, Information and Requirements

(3) Exhibits

RFQ 2025-001 Page 16

APPENDIX A1

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Lake Waco Source Water Evaluation and Preliminary Engineering Report City of Waco, Texas

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT PURPOSE

The City of Waco (City) proposes to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of Lake Waco, the City’s surface water supply reservoir, to support an engineering review of the existing water treatment process, including the dissolved air flotation (DAF) pre-treatment facility.

This Scope of Services defines the requirements for a source water quality, limnological, and watershed evaluation intended to produce technically defensible information suitable for incorporation into future planning, engineering, and regulatory submittals to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).

The study shall be conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) and relevant TCEQ and EPA guidance. The total duration of the study shall not exceed eighteen (18) months from Notice to Proceed.

1.1 Contracting and Task Authorization

The City intends to procure and award a base contract for Tasks 1 through 6. Task 7 is an optional service and, if authorized by the City, will be added by contract amendment as the project progresses.

2.0 APPLICABLE RULES, REGULATIONS, AND GUIDANCE

The Consultant shall perform work consistent with applicable, current rules and guidance. The reference below are provided to establish minimum expectations and are not intended to be exhaustive.

• 30 TAC Chapter 290, including Subchapter D (Public Water Systems) and Subchapter F (Drinking Water Standards), as applicable to the intended planning and reporting uses of the study.

• TCEQ Water Utility Division Guidance for Preliminary Engineering Reports (PERs)

• TCEQ Surface Water Quality Monitoring (SWQM) procedures, data quality objectives, and assessment frameworks

• TCEQ National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) requirements

• EPA Clean Water Act §303(d), Integrated Report Guidance, and associated TCEQ assessment unit and impairment listings

• TCEQ and EPA guidance on algae, nutrients, taste and odor, and cyanotoxins, as applicable

• EPA-approved analytical methods accepted by TCEQ

The Consultant shall identify and apply additional rules, guidance, or data quality requirements necessary to ensure the work products are suitable for regulatory review and engineering evaluation.

3.0 PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS

The Consultant shall provide a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated experience in Texas surface water systems and TCEQ-regulated drinking water facilities. The team shall include, at a minimum:

• A Texas-licensed Professional Engineer experienced in drinking water treatment and TCEQ submittals;

• Aquatic scientists, limnologists, or both, experienced in reservoir dynamics, algal ecology, and nutrient cycling;

• Field and laboratory personnel qualified to conduct sampling and analysis consistent with the approved Sampling and Analysis Plan and applicable laboratory accreditation requirements.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 17

4.0 SCOPE OF WORK

4.1 Task 1 – Review of Existing Information and Regulatory Records The Consultant shall compile, review, and evaluate existing information relevant to Lake Waco and its contributing watershed, including:

• Prior Lake Waco studies, technical memoranda, and monitoring reports;

• Historical water quality data from the City, TCEQ SWQM program, and other agencies;

• TCEQ watershed assessments, reservoir operation records, and nutrient-related studies;

• Available drinking water treatment plant operational data relevant to source water conditions, including DAF performance indicators where available.

• Estimate the economic impact of the lake, in terms of dollar amounts in categories of recreational use, and food and beverage manufacturing

The review shall identify historical trends, regulatory considerations, data limitations, and information gaps relevant to treatment performance, planning, and compliance with 30 TAC Chapter 290.

Deliverable:

Technical Memorandum summarizing historical findings, regulatory context, and data gaps, including a preliminary list of recommended field parameters for subsequent tasks.

4.2 Task 2 – Study Plan Development

The Consultant shall prepare a Study Plan describing the technical approach for the Lake Waco evaluation. The Study Plan shall include:

• Study objectives and relevance to TCEQ regulatory and planning requirements;

• A conceptual model of Lake Waco hydrodynamics, stratification, nutrient cycling, and algal productivity;

• Identification of water quality parameters relevant to treatment performance and regulatory compliance (e.g., turbidity, algae, nutrients, TOC, taste and odor compounds); as well as other parameters of interest for a water source in this region.

• An initial data management approach, including data formats, metadata, and validation workflow;

• Project schedule, milestones, and coordination procedures with City staff.

Deliverable:

Draft Study Plan submitted to the City for review and approval.

4.3 Task 3 – Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) and Watershed Data Review The Consultant shall prepare a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) consistent with TCEQ SWQM procedures and data quality requirements. The SAP shall include:

• Sampling locations, depths, and frequencies sufficient to characterize spatial and seasonal variability in Lake Waco; as well as differing contribution levels from each major tributary (North Bosque, Middle Bosque, Hog Creek, and South Bosque)

• Field methods, sample handling, preservation techniques, and holding times;

• Analytical parameters, detection limits, and laboratory methods consistent with TCEQ-accepted procedures;

• Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) protocols, including field duplicates, blanks, and data validation steps, as appropriate;

RFQ 2025-001 Page 18

• Use of laboratories accredited under applicable TCEQ accreditation requirements.

• The City of Waco and other entities are conducting additional efforts to capture tributary data (North Bosque, Middle Bosque, South Bosque, Hog Creek) the consultant should determine a method for correlating the data appropriately in the final report, the data will be available from the City of Waco Source Watershed Protection Manger in the second quarter of 2027.

Minimum field program expectations: The City desires that the SAP propose, at a minimum, four seasonal lake sampling events over a 12-month period. The proposed event timing should be selected to capture summer stratification, fall turnover, winter conditions, and spring bloom season. The Consultant shall propose a station network and depth approach sufficient to characterize conditions at the dam area, mid-lake, upper reservoir, and key tributary influenced areas, with vertical profiling and discrete sampling at depths appropriate to observed stratification.

At a minimum, the SAP shall be designed to support interpretation of:

• Reservoir stratification and mixing dynamics and their effect on turbidity, dissolved oxygen, and nutrient availability;

• Algal community presence and potential drivers of taste and odor, cyanobacterial blooms, and related operational challenges;

• Organic matter and disinfection byproduct precursor indicators relevant to treatment planning;

• Key water chemistry indicators that influence treatment performance and finished water stability, including pH, alkalinity, harness, conductivity, chloride, and sulfate.

In addition, the Consultant shall conduct a comprehensive watershed data review to inform sampling design and interpretation of results. This review shall include:

• TCEQ Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) reporting data applicable to the Lake Waco watershed;

• TCEQ wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharge monitoring reports, permits, and loading data for facilities discharging within the watershed;

• Stream and river water quality data collected by the City during the first twelve (12) months of this project, including tributary monitoring upstream of Lake Waco.

The Consultant shall evaluate these data to identify nutrient sources, spatial patterns, temporal trends, and watershed-driven influences affecting reservoir water quality.

Deliverable:

Sampling and Analysis Plan incorporating watershed data considerations, submitted for City approval prior to field implementation.

4.4 Task 4 – Field Sampling and Laboratory Analysis

Following approval of the SAP, the Consultant shall conduct lake sampling and laboratory analysis in accordance with the approved plan. Activities shall include:

• Seasonal sampling sufficient to capture stratification, turnover, and algal growth conditions typical of Texas reservoirs; as well as differing contribution levels from each major tributary (North Bosque, Middle Bosque, Hog Creek, and South Bosque).

• Proper documentation of field observations, chain-of-custody, and QA/QC results;

• Use of TCEQ-accredited laboratories and approved analytical methods.

• The City of Waco and other entities are conducting additional efforts to capture tributary data (North Bosque, Middle Bosque, South Bosque, Hog Creek) the consultant should determine a method for correlating the data appropriately in the final report, the data will be available from the City of Waco Source Watershed Protection Manger in the second quarter of 2027.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 19

Field sampling expectations: The City anticipates that each seasonal sampling event will include, at a minimum, a full depth of situ profile at each lake station for temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, specific conductance, and turbidity, plus discrete laboratory samples collected at depths appropriate to observed stratification (for example, surface, mid-depth, and near bottom where conditions allow). The Consultant shall propose event specific refinements in the SAP based on observed field conditions and the objectives of the study.

All data shall be suitable for regulatory review and engineering evaluation.

Deliverable:

Validated analytical data, QA/QC documentation, and a consolidated electronic data package in City specified formants (for example, Excel or database ready tables with metadata).

4.5 Task 5 – Draft Lake Waco Source Water and Watershed Study Report The Consultant shall prepare a draft Lake Waco Source Water and Watershed Study Report suitable for inclusion as supporting documentation in a TCEQ Preliminary Engineering Report. The report shall include:

• Study background, objectives, and regulatory relevance;

• Summary of historical and newly collected lake and tributary data;

• Evaluation of seasonal and spatial trends in reservoir water quality;

• Discussion of algal conditions, nutrient dynamics, organic matter, turbidity, and other parameters relevant to drinking water treatment;

• Evaluation of differing contribution levels of flow and contamination from each of the major tributaries (North Bosque, Middle Bosque, Hog Creek, and South Bosque)

• Identify any other parameters that are likely to be of concern for a water source in this region.

• Assessment of watershed health, including:

o Review of EPA-recognized impairment listings and assessment units affecting Lake Waco and its contributing watersheds since calendar year 2000;

o Identification of nutrient-related impairments, delistings, and management actions.

• Treatment relevance discussion that connects observed source water conditions to practical operational considerations for the existing DAF pretreatment facility, without committing the City to a specific design alternative.

The Consultant shall explicitly address the following interpretive questions using TCEQ- and EPA-consistent assessment frameworks:

1. Are water quality conditions in Lake Waco better, worse, or comparable to conditions observed around the year 2000, based on available data trends?

2. Does Lake Waco receive nutrient loadings greater than expected background levels, considering watershed land use, CAFO activity, and permitted WWTP discharges?

3. Is Lake Waco primarily storing, processing, or exporting received nutrient loads, based on residence time, biological response, and observed water quality conditions?

4. Based on watershed inputs and observed trends, should the City anticipate increased drinking water treatment complexity or cost due to nutrient-driven conditions such as algal blooms, elevated organic matter, or taste and odor events?

5. What are the dominant seasonal drivers of algae and turbidity conditions most relevant to DAF pretreatment performance, and what leading indicators could be used to anticipate operational upsets?

RFQ 2025-001 Page 20

6. Do organic matter indicators suggest elevated risk for disinfection byproduct precursor formation, and are there seasonal periods of increased risk that merit operational planning?

7. Do the measured water chemistry indicators suggest meaningful changes in source water stability that could influence treatment chemical demand or finished water stabilization needs?

8. What monitoring refinements or decision triggers should be considered for ongoing source water management, including recommended parameters, locations, and sampling frequency for routine operations?

Interpretations shall be technically supported, clearly documented, and framed to inform engineering decision-making without assigning regulatory liability.

Draft Lake Waco Source Water and Watershed Study Report.

4.6 Task 6 – City Review and Comment Resolution

The Consultant shall support City review by:

• Participating in review meetings or workshops, as requested;

• Preparing written responses to City comments;

• Revising the report consistent with City direction and TCEQ technical expectations.

Final Lake Waco Source Water and Watershed Study Report and comment-response documentation.

4.7 Task 7 – Preliminary Engineering Report (PER)

***Task 7 will not be initially tasked as part of the scope, it will be added by amendment as the project progresses*** If authorized by the City, the Consultant shall prepare a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) consistent with TCEQ Water Utility Division guidance and 30 TAC §290.46. The PER shall:

• Summarize lake and watershed study findings relevant to the existing DAF pre-treatment facility and overall treatment objectives;

• Identify source water quality conditions influencing DAF performance, operational reliability, treatment flexibility, and long-term resiliency;

• Discuss implications for compliance with TCEQ drinking water standards;

• Identify potential treatment considerations and areas requiring further engineering evaluation, including data needs for potential pilot testing or bench scale evaluations, as applicable.

The PER shall not commit the City to a specific design alternative.

TCEQ-aligned Preliminary Engineering Report.

5.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE

All tasks shall be completed within eighteen (18) months of Notice to Proceed. A detailed project schedule shall be included in the Study Plan and updated as necessary.

6.0 COORDINATION AND DOCUMENTATION

The Consultant shall coordinate with City staff throughout the project and maintain documentation, analytical defensibility, and reporting quality consistent with TCEQ technical and regulatory expectations to support future planning, permitting, and funding activities.

At a minimum, coordination and deliverables shall include:

RFQ 2025-001 Page 21

• Project kickoff meeting and periodic progress check-ins at intervals agreed upon with the City;

• Timely notification of any field conditions, safety issues, or data quality concerns that could affect schedule or results;

• A consolidated data package for all newly generated field and laboratory data, including station metadata, methods, and quality assurance and quality control documentation;

• Electronic copies of all figures, tables, and maps in editable formats suitable for future inclusion in TCEQ submittals.

RFQ 2025-001 Page 22

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

for the

LAKE BOSQUE PROJECT

BOSQUE COUNTY, TEXAS

Prepared for

The Brazos River Authority

Prepared by

Paul Price Associates, Inc.

P.O. Box 23207

Austin, Texas 78736

September, 1987

027EA.DOC

APPENDIX A2A

RFQ 2025-001 Page 23 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

page

1.0 The Proposed Project 1

1.1 Scope of Project 2

1.1.1 Construction Activities 5

1.1.2 Proposed Operation 6

1.2 Purpose and Need for the Project 6

2.0 Vater Supply Alternatives 8

2.1 Water Supply Alternatives considered 8

2.1.1 Non Structural Alternatives 8

2.1.1.1 Groundwater Use and Conservation 8

2.1.1.2 Wastewater Reuse 9

2.1.1.3 Lake Whitney Alternative 9

2.1.2 Structural Alternatives 10

2.1.2.1 North Bosque River Reservoir Sites 10

2.1.2.2 Leon River Reservoir Site 11

2.1.2.3 Diversion and Off-Channel Storage, Brazos River 11

2.2 Selection of the Proposed Project 12

3.0 The Affected Environment 14

3.1 Climate and Air Quality 14

3. 1. 1 Climate 14

3.1.2 Air Quality 17

3.2 Noise 17

3.3 Geology and Soils 17

3.3.1 Stratigraphy and Lithology 17

3.3.2 Physiography 19

3.3.3 Soils 20

3.3.4 Paleontology 21

3.3.5 Economic Geology 22

3.4 Water Resources 22

3.4.1 Ground Water 22

3.4.2 Surface Water 24

3.4.2.1 Hydrology and Water Quality 25

3.4.2.2 Wetlands and Floodplains 31

3.5 Aquatic Biology 32

3.5.1 Aquatic Habitats and Biota 32

3.5.1.1 Channel Characteristics 32

3.5.1.2 Pool Habitats 35

3.5.1.3 Riffle Habitats 36

3.5.1.4 Aquatic Biota 37

3.5.2 Important Species 43

3.5.2.1 Commercially or Recreationally Important Species 43

3.5.2.2 Threatened and Endangered Species 43

3.5.2.3 Other Important Species 44

3.6 Vegetation 45

3.6.1 Plant Communities And Characteristic Species 45

3.6.1.1 Upland Woodland 45

3.6.1.2 Bottomland Forest 47

3.6.1.3 Native Grassland 48

3.6.1.4 Improved Pasture 49

3.6.1.5 Stream Beds 49

RFQ 2025-001 Page 24

3.6.1.6 Aquatic Habitats

3.6.1.7 Wetlands

3.6.1.8 Cropland

3.6.2 Important Plant Species and Communities

3.6.2.1 Recreationally and Commercially Valuable Species

3.6.2.2 Endangered and Threatened Plant Species

3.6.2.3 Important Communities

3.7 Wildlife

3.7.1 Wildlife Communities and Species

3.7.1.1 Bottomland/Riparian Woodland

3.7.1.2 Upland Woodlands

3.7.1.3 Open Habitat

3.7.1.4 Aquatic and Other Wetlands

3.7.2 Important Wildlife Species and Habitats

3.7.2.1 Recreationally or Commercially Important Species

3.7.2.2 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Species

3.7.2.3 Important Habitats

~.8 Socioeconomics and Land Use

3.8.1 Population

3.8.1.1 Age Distribution

3.8.1.2 Population Projections

3.8.2 Local Economy

3.8.2.1 Income Analysis

3.8.3 Community Facilities and Services

3.8.3.1 Education

3.8.3.2 Public Safety

ii

3.8.3.3 Health Service and Facilities

3.8.3.4 Existing Water and Wastewater

3.8.3.5 Future Water Requirements

3.8.3.6 Transportation

Treatment Facilities70

3.8.3.7 Housing

3.8.4 Public Finance

3.8.5 Recreation and Aesthetics

3.8.6 Land Use

3.9 Cultural Resources

3.9.1 Regional Setting

3.9.2 Lake Bosque Site Survey

4.0 Environmental Effects of the Proposed Project

4.1 Climatology and Air Quality

4.1.1 Effects of no action

4.1.2 Construction Effects

4.1.3 Operation Effects

4.2 Noise

4.2.1 Effects of No Action

4.2.2 Construction Effects

4.2.3 Operation Effects

4.3 Geology and Soils

4.3.1 Effects of No Action

4.3.2 Construction Effects

4.3.3 Operation Effects

4.4 Water Resources

4.4.1 Effects of No Action

4.4.2 Construction Effects

4.4.3 Operation Effects

RFQ 2025-001 Page 25

4.5 Ecology

4.5.1 Aquatic Biology

4.5.1.1 Effects of No Action

4.5.1.2 Construction Effects

4.5.1.3 Operation Effects

4.5.1.4 Effects on Important Species and Habitats

4.5.2 Vegetation

4.5.2.1 Effects of No Action

4.5.2.2 Construction Effects

4.5.2.3 Operation Effects

4.5.2.4 Effects on Important Species and Habitats

4.5.3 Wildlife

4.5.3.1 Effects of No Action

4.5.3.2 Construction Effects

4.5.3.3 Operation Effects

4.5.3.4 Effects on Important Species and Habitats

4.6 Socioeconomics and Land Use

4.6.1 Effects of No Action

4.6.1.1 Population

4.6.1.2 Local Economy

4.6.1.3 Community Facilities and Services

4.6.1.4 Public Finance

4.6.1.5 Recreation and Aesthetics

4.6.1.6 Land Use

4.6.2 Construction Effects

4.6.2.1 Population

4.6.2.2 Local Economy

4.6.2.3 Community Facilities and Services

4.6.2.4 Public Finance

4.6.2.5 Recreation and Aesthetics

4.6.2.6 Land Use

4.6.3 Operation Effects

4.6.3.1 Population

4.6.3.2 Local Economy

4.6.3.3 Facilities and Services

4.6.3.4 Public Finance

4.6.3.5 Recreation and Aesthetics

4.6.3.6 Land Use

4.7 Cultural Resources

4.7.1 Effects of No Action

4.7.2 Construction Effects

4.7.3 Operation Effects

5.0 Kitigation Plans

5.1 Aquatic Communities

5.2 Terrestrial Communities

5.3 Cultural Resources

6.0 Literature Cited

iii

RFQ 2025-001 Page 26

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Proposed Lake Bosque Reservoir Site

1-2 Proposed Roadway and Powerline Changes

3-1 The Bosque River System

3-2 Geological Map of the North Bosque Watershed

3-3

3-4

3-5

Median Flow by Month at Clifton, Texas

Median Flow by Month, Bosque Dam Site

The influence of Underlying Geological Structure on the Longitudinal Gradient of the North Bosque River page iv

RFQ 2025-001 Page 27

Table 3-1

3-2

3-3

3-4

3-5

3-6

3-7

3-8

4-1

4-2

4-3

4-4

4-5

LIST OF TABLES

Monthly Flow Frequency Distribution at the Proposed Dam Site

Fish Species Occuring in the North Bosque River and Lake Waco

Areas (acres) and Percentages of Vegetation Map Units, Lake Bosque Project Area, May, 1985

Population Growth in the Study Area, 1970 and 1980

Study Area Population Projections

Per Capita Water Demand Projections

Reported 1980 Water Use and Projected Low and High Range 2040 Water Demand

Effects-on-Sites Characterizations for Lake Bosque Project

Monthly Flow Frequency Distribution at the Proposed Dam Site

Percent Decrease, or…