1) RFP-MG-09042024 BVSS.pdf

(Rev. 07/26/24)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) No.: MG-09042024

PROPOSAL DUE DATE: 10/03/2024

Slow Machine Protection System (MPS) Storage Ring (SR) Production

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code: 335999, All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing

This solicitation is a small business set-aside.

Procurement Point of Contact: Martha Gamarano Grausz Telephone No: (510) 486-6618 Email: mggrausz@lbl.gov

University of California, Managing and Operating Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Request for Proposal No. MG-09042024

1. INTRODUCTION

The University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (“University” or “LBNL”) requests a proposal for the assembly and schedule of 5 Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) chassis for the SR MPS for the Advanced Light Source Upgrade (ALS-U) project, in accordance with this RFP, Sample Subcontract, and other enclosures.

This solicitation is governed by procurement policies and procedures established under the University’s Prime Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 with the U.S. Government, represented by the Department of Energy (DOE), for management and operation of LBNL. Proposals submitted will be treated as offers and any resulting award(s) will be a Subcontract under the University’s Prime Contract.

Timeline of Events Offeror Questions Due (see page 02) 09/19/2024, no later than 3:00 pm Pacific Time

Proposals Due 10/03/2024, no later than 3:00 pm Pacific Time

Table 1

This acquisition is for is for the assembly, and schedule of 5 (five) Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) chassis for the SR Slow MPS, based on design information provided by LBNL in support of the Advanced Light Source Upgrade (ALS-U) project. The chassis designs are based on Allen-Bradley 5380 Series CPU and 5000 series Inputs and Outputs (I/O) modules.

1.1 Estimated Term

It is expected that the Subcontract will be performed over a period of 50 weeks and the ordered items should be delivered 50 weeks after receipt of the order (ARO).

1.2 Notice of Small Business Set-Aside

Proposals are solicited exclusively from small business concerns, as that term is defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 2.1. Any award(s) resulting from this solicitation will only be made to a small business concern. The University does not require small business partners in a joint venture or teaming arrangement with a large business concern submitting a proposal for a University Subcontract to perform any specific percentage of the work under the Subcontract that will be awarded as a result of the subject solicitation.

1.3 NAICS Code and Small Business Size Standard

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code for this acquisition is 335999, All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing. The corresponding small business size standard for this acquisition is 600 in number of employees.

The offeror shall complete the Small Business Program Representations clause in the attached Representations and Certifications form based on this small business size standard. Refer to Subpart 19.1

- Size Standards, of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) for information on calculating the number of employees.

Under 15 U.S.C. 645(d), any person who misrepresents a firm's status as a business concern that is small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, service-disabled veteran-owned small, economically disadvantaged women-owned small, or women-owned small eligible under the Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Program in order to obtain a contract to be awarded under the preference programs established pursuant to section 8, 9, 15, 31, and 36 of the Small Business Act or any other provision of Federal law that specifically references section 8(d) for a definition of program eligibility, shall-

(i) Be punished by imposition of fine, imprisonment, or both;

(ii) Be subject to administrative remedies, including suspension and debarment; and

(iii) Be ineligible for participation in programs conducted under the authority of the Act.

2. SOLICITATION RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION FOR AWARD

2.1 General

The offeror must submit documentation illustrating their approach for satisfying the requirements of this solicitation. Failure to submit any of the information required by this solicitation may be cause for unfavorable consideration or exclusion from further consideration. Proposals must be written in English and be clear, coherent, and prepared in sufficient detail for effective evaluation.

Written proposals must be submitted by email (or other form of secure electronic submission) to the University Procurement Representative (mggrausz@lbl.gov) no later than 3:00 pm Pacific Time on 10/03/2024.

Additional contact information is referenced below:

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Attention: Martha Gamarano Grausz Mail Stop 90R1121-PROC

RFP MG-09042024

One Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720

All correspondence in conjunction with this solicitation must be directed to the University Procurement Representative. Proposals shall be valid for a period of 90 days from the proposal due date. Acceptance of late proposals will be at the University’s discretion. The University reserves the right to reject any proposal, to waive any minor proposal irregularities, or to cancel this RFP at any time prior to award without cost to the University. The University will not reimburse any firm for proposal preparation or any other costs related to the participation in this RFP.

2.2 Offerors’ Questions

The University will respond to questions submitted via email to the University Procurement Representative on or before 3:00 pm Pacific Time on 09/19/2024. Questions submitted after this date may not be answered prior to the proposal due date. Answers to questions that are submitted timely will be issued or be made available to all offerors electronically, ensuring that the identity of all offerors will remain anonymous.

2.3 Evaluation and Selection

2.3.1 Determination of Responsive and Responsible Offers

The University intends to select for award the responsive and responsible offeror whose proposal demonstrates that the offeror(s) can satisfy the minimum technical requirements specified later in this RFP (if any minimum requirements are specified) and contain(s) the combination of price, performance features, and supplier attributes (described later in this RFP) offering the best overall value to the University.

An initial review of offers will be performed by the Procurement Specialist to determine if the offer is complete and provides all the required information to enable the University to evaluate the offer to determine if it is responsive.

Offerors may be contacted only for clarification purposes during the initial review. Incomplete offers may be considered non-responsive and may be excluded from further consideration if the omissions are substantive (e.g., one or more required documents not submitted, one or more evaluation factors not addressed). Offerors will be notified when appropriate in the interest of fair business practice and professional courtesy if their offer was determined non-responsive and/or not meeting minimum requirements and the reasons for rejection will be provided if a debrief is requested.

A responsive offeror is one whose proposal satisfies the requirements of this RFP including those listed in Section 2.4, and the requirements of the Sample Subcontract and its incorporated documents. A responsible offeror is one that has adequate financial resources, ability to comply with the performance schedule, has a satisfactory performance record, has the necessary technical skills to be considered capable of performing and is otherwise eligible and qualified to perform the proposed Subcontract at the time of award. An offeror cannot be determined as “responsible” if it is currently ineligible for receiving new federal government prime contracts or subcontracts. The determination of responsiveness and responsibility of complete offers will be made by a team consisting of technical and procurement personnel and considering the evaluation factors described in Section 2.4, below.

2.3.2 Evaluation of Technical Factors, Supplier Attributes and Non-Technical Factors Once the University has determined offers are complete in the initial review, they will be evaluated to confirm that minimum requirements of the solicitation stated in Section 2.4.2.1 have been met.

The University will go on to determine the best overall value by evaluating the supplier attributes, and non-technical factors including the price. The University Procurement Representative will make a determination for award to the successful offeror based on the results of the evaluation.

The University’s expectations for these evaluation factors are stated in Section 2.4.2.2 and 2.4.3.2. The University reserves the right to award to other than the lowest price offeror. Offerors should therefore strive to be persuasive in describing the value of their proposed performance features, supplier attributes, and other factors, including how they would enhance the likelihood of successful performance and achievement of the University’s objectives. Price will be evaluated based on the total proposed price, including freight.

2.3.3 Additional Evaluation Considerations

The University’s evaluation will be based on the information provided by the offeror, the University’s own experience with the offeror, and/or information obtained from the offeror’s references and other sources. In its evaluation, the University will consider the degree of substantiation of the proposed approaches in the proposal volumes and in response to any discussions, if held. The University is not responsible for locating or securing any information which is not included in the proposal. To ensure sufficient information is available, offerors must furnish as part of their proposal all descriptive material (such as manuals, drawings, technical specifications, or other information) necessary for the University’s evaluation.

Offerors are advised that, although negotiations may follow receipt of proposals, award may be made without discussions on proposals received. If the University determines that revised proposals are necessary, the University may solicit them from only those offerors deemed to have a reasonable chance to be selected for award. An offeror is identified as having a reasonable chance of award based on the evaluation indicating they are responsive and responsible; their offer satisfies the minimum requirements of the solicitation; they have presented acceptable or strong performance features and supplier attributes;

they have sufficient bandwidth to take on new work; and their proposed pricing is considered fair and reasonable. The University reserves the right to make no awards, a single award, or multiple awards as a result of this solicitation, if it is in the best interest of the University.

2.4 Proposal Submittal Requirements

Proposals should consist of a cover letter, a technical volume, and a business volume. Offerors should submit these as separate documents. All proposals must be submitted in the following formats: MS Word, MS Excel, PDF, or an alternate format approved by the University Procurement Representative.

The offeror may submit an alternate proposal to address the objectives of the Statement of Work and/or Specifications, if considered more advantageous to the University than the requested proposal. An explanation of the perceived benefits to the University should be included. If accepted, alternative proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation factors as described in Section 2.4.2 below.

Volume Factor

Cover Letter Per Section 2.4.1

Technical Volume

Technical Evaluation Factors and Attributes

Factor 1 - Ability to Meet Technical Requirements

Factor 2 - Deliverables and Schedule

Factor 3 - Manufacturing Capabilities & Capacity

Factor 4 - Past Performance

Factor 5 - Quality Assurance

Volume Factor

Business Volume

Non-Technical Evaluation Factors

Enclosures

Offeror’s Acceptance of the terms, conditions, general provisions, and other incorporated documents of the Sample Subcontract

Price Proposal Schedule, Attachment A Table 2

2.4.1 Cover Letter

The cover letter must identify the offeror’s name and address, solicitation number and title, the name(s), title(s), email address(es), and telephone number(s) of the individuals in offeror’s organization who have commitment authority on behalf of the offeror and will be responsible for contractual negotiations and administration of any resultant Subcontract.

2.4.2 Technical Volume

The technical volume should contain a comprehensive discussion of how the offeror will fulfill the technical requirements and successfully perform the Subcontract, including a discussion of important performance features and supplier attributes, highlighting any aspects which may separate it from its competitors.

2.4.2.1 Technical Evaluation Factors and Attributes

The technical volume should identify, describe, and discuss the following performance features and supplier attributes the University has identified as desirable for the successful performance of the proposed Subcontract. The University will use these criteria for the subjective evaluation of proposals. The criteria are listed in the relative order of importance to the University. The offeror should discuss them in the proposal and may identify other performance features and supplier attributes not listed below that the offeror believes may be of value to the University. If the University agrees, they will be considered in the evaluation process. In all cases, the University will assess the value of each proposal as submitted.

The following adjectival ratings will be used to rate the performance features and supplier attributes:

● Excellent: Proposal demonstrates excellent understanding and satisfaction of the University’s requirements. Its approach significantly exceeds the desired performance features and supplier attributes and is highly beneficial to the University. There are no evaluated weaknesses.

● Good: Proposal demonstrates good understanding and satisfaction of the University’s requirements.

Its approach exceeds the desired performance features and supplier attributes and is beneficial to the University. There are no significant evaluated weaknesses.

● Acceptable: Proposal demonstrates an adequate understanding and satisfaction of the University’s requirements. Its approach satisfies most desired performance features and supplier attributes and is beneficial to the University. There may be minor, but correctable evaluated weaknesses.

● Unacceptable: Proposal fails to demonstrate an adequate understanding of the University’s requirements or its approach fails to meet desired performance features or supplier attributes that are beneficial to the University. There are unacceptable weaknesses that can only be met with major changes to the proposed approach.

• Factor 1 – Ability to Meet Technical Requirements

The technical proposal must demonstrate the offeror’s ability to successfully meet the requirements of the technical specifications set out in the Statement of Work (SOW) AL-1747-5370 Slow MPS SR Production SOW, Rev. A Dated 07/09/2024 and the associated specifications listed below. The offeror must also address, confirm, and provide examples of their ability to comply with each section of this document by number.

The technical proposal should, at a minimum, address how the offeror meets the requirements of the following:

AL-1747-5370 SOW

• Section 2 Scope of Work

• Section 4 Management

• Section 5 Engineering and Assembly

• Section 6 Build Standard

a. No subcontracting of assembly work

• Section 7 Shipping and Handling Evaluation for Factor 1 is based on the extent the offeror’s technical proposal demonstrates the offeror’s ability to successfully assemble products that meet the requirements of the SOW and specifications of this solicitation.

• Factor 2 – Deliverables and Schedule

The offeror must submit a delivery schedule that meets the requirements set out in the Statement of Work (SOW) AL-1747-5370 Slow MPS SR Production SOW, Rev. A Dated 07/09/2024, Rev. A Section 3 Table 1.2 including but not limited to Technical Reviews of both 1st Article and Production units, and delivery that meets the University’s project schedule requirements.

The offeror’s documentation submitted must include but not be limited to the following:

a) A detailed delivery schedule or timeline including all areas referenced above, provided in Calendar Weeks ARO.

b) Proposed lead times and the ability to meet the projected delivery schedules

c) Proposed carrier and estimate of total shipping costs

The offeror may submit an alternate schedule and delivery date with justification for additional lead time or a delivery schedule that meets or beats the project schedule requirements. Acceptance of an alternate schedule will be at the sole discretion of the University.

Evaluation of Factor 2 is based on an acceptable delivery & schedule that meets project requirements.

• Factor 3 – Manufacturing Capabilities & Capacity

The Offeror must provide a plan to successfully demonstrate the Offeror’s resources and project management support that is adequate to deliver the items on schedule, using a quality-controlled manufacturing process, and include adequate procurement capabilities, fabrication facilities, and testing facilities to execute the subcontract. The plan must:

a) Identify resources and project management support that are adequate to deliver these devices

b) Outline equipment, space, and processes that are sufficient to produce the chassis

c) Provide UL508A certification

d) Provide ISO 9001 manufacturing workflow process

Evaluation of Factor 3 is based on project management and facilities that meet project requirements.

• Factor 4 – Past Performance The Offeror must have successfully performed within the last five years, contracts similar in type and complexity as the proposed Subcontract. The offeror must include in its proposal a written description of a minimum of two contracts within the last five years that demonstrate that the offeror has successfully performed similar work in a quality manner, in particular on how it met delivery schedule requirements. The Offeror must provide details including specific timelines, milestones, and any project management methodologies, or tools, used to ensure schedule adherence (e.g., Gantt charts, Agile methodologies, project management software, spreadsheets, etc.) The Offeror is also required to provide comparative documentation, such as letters of reference, project documentation, and performance metrics, of the original schedule versus the actual schedule for each contract, commencing with the date of the initial kick-off meeting. This should include an analysis of any variances and corrective actions taken, if applicable, in response. Information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and creative solutions with respect to corrective actions taken is encouraged.

The offeror must also include as part of the past performance documentation, at least two different chassis assemblies that must resemble pictures in Section 5 of the SOW with three key components:

1. Rack-mountable chassis

2. Hand-wired or pre-assembled harness electronics wiring within the chassis

3. Chassis external panel-mounted connectors

Included in the description of these contracts should be the client/customer technical and business contact information (name, title, telephone number, and/or email address).

Evaluation of Factor 4 is based on the Offeror’s capabilities to demonstrate that it can successfully execute the scope of this subcontract under similar circumstances.

• Factor 5 – Quality Assurance The Offeror must provide a copy of their Quality Assurance Program (QAP) that demonstrates how it maintains and applies an effective QAP for the design, manufacture, and testing of all items, and equipment provided per the Statement of Work (SOW) AL-1747-5370 Slow MPS SR Production SOW, Rev. A Dated 07/09/2024, Rev. A, as outlined in Section 8.

The offeror must also complete and return the ALS-U Supplier Quality Evaluation Survey AL-1208- 0209 Rev. C Dated 03/25/2024 for the University to assess the offeror's capabilities.

Evaluation of Factor 5 is based on the Offeror’s capabilities to demonstrate the Offeror’s ability to maintain an effective QA program.

2.4.3 Business Volume

2.4.3.1 Non-Technical Factors

The following non-technical factors will also be evaluated as a part of the negotiation and award process.

2.4.3.1.1 Enclosures

The offeror must complete the following enclosures and submit them with the business volume:

• Representations & Certifications

• Price Proposal Schedule, Attachment A – Offerors must propose a milestone payment schedule with their offer for consideration/negotiation if milestone payments are desired.

• AL-1208-0209 - AL ALS-U Supplier Quality Evaluation Survey, Rev. C Dated March

25, 2024

The following enclosures are provided for informational purposes and do not need to be returned with the proposal:

• Sample Subcontract and its Incorporated Documents including:

o General Provisions for Commercial Supplies and Services, dated 12/22/23

Notice: The design/documentation package and all associated documents, drawings, and records are owned by DOE. Documents may be obtained from LBNL via [add information on access or link here].

Use of the documents for any purpose outside of (1) responding to this solicitation or (2) an LBNL [fabrication or other as applicable] subcontract is strictly prohibited. No document may be distributed to others or otherwise reproduced or used without written permission from the LBNL University Procurement Representative.

2.4.3.1.2 Offeror’s Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Offeror’s Acceptance of the terms, conditions, general provisions, and other incorporated documents of the Sample Subcontract.

The offeror should accept the terms, conditions, general provisions, and other incorporated documents of the Sample Subcontract, including the requirement to include clauses in its lower-tier subcontracts at any tier, to the extent applicable. The terms and conditions of the Sample Subcontract, have been approved by the DOE, and it is not the University’s intent to make material changes. While an offeror may identify “exceptions” to the Sample Subcontract, such exceptions may reflect unfavorably upon the offeror’s proposal. Exceptions make it difficult to compare competing offers, and the process of resolving exceptions may be time-consuming and result in unacceptable delays in the award of a Subcontract.

The offeror should include in its proposal a statement that the offeror takes no exceptions to the terms, conditions, general provisions, or the incorporated documents of the Sample Subcontract. The offeror should include in its request for consideration of exceptions a redlined version of the Sample Subcontract with all proposed revisions indicated by tracked changes, or a separate sheet with all proposed revisions indicated by tracked changes, referencing the article or clause to which the proposed revision applies. The offeror must also include in its request for consideration of any exception, a business case for that exception, providing a justification for the requested change and an analysis of any increased risk to the University.

The University will attempt to resolve exceptions in a timely manner through an iterative process and with review, concurrence, and/or approval of both the University and DOE. However, offerors are advised that when exceptions cannot be resolved and agreement cannot be reached on terms and conditions, award will not be made to otherwise successful offerors.

2.4.3.1.3 Price Proposal

Price, while being an important factor, is not in and of itself the determining factor in the selection of the successful offeror for award of the Subcontract contemplated by this solicitation. Price is not weighted;

rather, each offeror’s price will be evaluated for realism, reasonableness, and completeness of the proposed Subcontract price. The price proposal must include a total firm fixed price and a completed Price Schedule.

3. SOLICITATION PROVISIONS

3.1 Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Proposal Data

The University will safeguard any commercial or financial data or information contained in proposals when marked in accordance with paragraph (e) of Federal Acquisition Regulation clause 52.215-1. Such data or information includes (i) trade secrets or (ii) commercial or financial information that is privileged or considered business confidential, either of which is developed at private expense.

The University will endeavor to properly maintain such data and information to the same degree as its own data and information and not disclose such data or information to individuals other than those working for the University or the Government on this procurement. These individuals will be bound by an obligation of confidentiality to use such data or information solely for the purpose of evaluation of the proposal. Proposals received will be retained and disposed of in accordance with requirements in the University’s Prime Contract with DOE.

If the offeror intends to use a product or process for which there is a patent position, the proposal should so indicate and list patent applications and/or patents granted (including dates, numbers, and descriptions), and whether the Government has rights related to the patents.

3.2 Export Control Classification Information

Before Subcontract award, the offeror will provide export control classification information for all items as required by the Representations and Certifications. Items may not be accepted without the export control information required by this Request for Proposal.

If any of the ordered items (including data, software, or services) are export controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Sections 120-130, aka "ITAR"); the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Sections 730-774, aka "EAR"); the Nuclear Related Regulations (10 CFR 110 and 10 CFR 810); the Foreign Assets Control Regulations (31 CFR section 500-599, aka "OFAC"); or if sourced internationally, i.e., controlled under a country's equivalent dual use or military strategic goods list, then the Subcontractor agrees to provide the Procurement Representative with written notification of this export controlled status prior to shipment or transfer to the University. The notification must specifically identify the export-controlled item(s) and its export classification. The University reserves the right to cancel or modify any part of the Subcontract that includes export-controlled items, data, software, or services prior to accepting delivery. Subcontractor shall indemnify the University and the Government for all export enforcement mitigation cost, fines, or penalties incurred by the University, specifically arising from Subcontractor's failure to comply with this notification provision and the University's reliance on the Subcontractor's representation as provided.

3.3 System for Award Management (SAM)

The selected offeror will be required to be registered in the federal government’s SAM database within 30 days of Subcontract award. This requirement will not apply if the work supports emergency operations or the Subcontract is with an individual for work performed outside the U.S. and its outlying areas. Refer to the System for Award Management (FAR Clause 52.204-7) and System for Award Management Maintenance (FAR clause 52.204-13) clauses for additional information.

3.4 Buy American Act Requirements - Supplies

The General Provisions of the Sample Subcontract include FAR Clause 52.225-1, Buy American Act - Supplies, which requires that only domestic end products be delivered (i.e., products manufactured in the United States or unmanufactured products mined or produced in the United States), unless a specific exception applies. The offeror is to indicate in the Representations & Certifications form, to be submitted with the proposal, whether it proposes to furnish any foreign end products.

The University may apply an exception to the Buy American Act for a proposed foreign end product if:

1. Its price, including any customs duty, is more than 20% less than the price for a comparable domestic end product available from a large business concern, or more than 30% less than the price for a comparable domestic end product available from a small business concern; or

2. A domestic end product satisfying the University’s requirements is not reasonably available.

If the offeror proposes to furnish any foreign end product, the proposal should also include information and data supporting its use as an exception to the Buy American Act. Refer to FAR Clause 52.225-1 for the definition of end product, domestic end product, and foreign end product.

3.5 Sustainability-Related Requirements

LBNL’s Sustainable Acquisition Program (SAP) is subject to several interacting initiatives and Federal, DOE, State, and University requirements related to sustainability, including Recycled Content Products (EPA Designated Products), Biobased (BioPreferred®), energy efficient products (EnergyStar®), environmentally preferable and energy efficient electronics (EPEAT®), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP), Non-Ozone Depleting Alternative Products (SNAP) and Water Efficient Plumbing Products (EPA WaterSense®).

The selected offeror must deliver products and services in compliance with the Environmentally Preferable Products and Services (EPP) article of the Sample Subcontract which implements the requirements of DEAR 970.5223-7 and 952.223-78, Sustainable Acquisition Program, as well as other federal- and state-mandated sustainability requirements.

As part of this requirement, the Subcontractor must report on compliance with recycled content requirements, bio-based, and/or energy-savings (i.e. EPEAT® and EnergyStar®) if applicable to their work effort or product being provided.

Offerors are strongly encouraged to consult the General Services Administration (GSA) Sustainable Facilities Tool (SFTool), the SFTool Product Search, and Vendor Resources pages within that site for additional information on the listed products and services potentially subject to these requirements.

Offerors should pay particular attention to the following subject areas and/or products and services that are frequently delivered as a part of LBNL’s subcontracted work efforts (the terms in parentheses are defined within the SF Tool site):

o Recycled Content Products (EPA Designated Products) o Biobased Products (BioPreferred®) o Energy Efficient Products (EnergyStar®) o Environmentally Preferable and Energy Efficient Electronics (EPEAT®) o Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction o Non-Ozone Depleting Alternative Products o Water Efficient Plumbing Products (EPA WaterSense®) o Waste Reduction

LBNL is required to comply with UC policy on sustainable procurement to the extent to which they do not conflict with requirements in the Prime Contract with DOE. The UC policy prioritizes waste reduction in the following order: reduce, reuse, and then recycle. Accordingly, subcontractors and vendors must first reduce unnecessary purchasing and then prioritize purchasing surplus or multiple use products before purchasing recyclable or compostable products in accordance with the EPP article of the Sample Subcontract. UC Policy also sets forth requirements for:

● Packaging,

● a ban on foam and single use plastic food service and other product packaging, and

● E-Waste recycling not addressed in the Federal requirements.

https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement https://sftool.ecomedes.com/ https://sftool.gov/learn/about/652/vendor-resources https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement

The California In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation requires in-use off-road diesel-fueled fleet owners to report off-road diesel vehicle inventories and actions taken to reduce vehicle emissions to the California Air Resources Board (CARB). LBNL is required to obtain certificates from potential subcontractors and vendors using or offering equipment or fleets exceeding 25 total horsepower (HP) demonstrating compliance for Laboratory-related work in the State of California prior to award. A fleet is defined as one or more vehicles collectively exceeding 25 HP.

By submitting a proposal, offerors acknowledge the SAP and reporting requirements included in the Environmentally Preferable Products and/or Services article and General Provisions of the sample subcontract.

3.6 Ensuring Adequate COVID-19 Safety Protocols

Any Subcontract awarded as a result of this solicitation will include FAR 52.223-99 ENSURING

ADEQUATE COVID-19 SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS (OCT 2021)

(DEVIATION), this clause implements Executive Order 14042, Ensuring Adequate COVID Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors, dated September 9, 2021 (published in the Federal Register on September 14, 2021, 86 FR 50985).

Enforcement of FAR 52.223-99 is currently enjoined by a federal court. Therefore, compliance with this clause is not currently required. However, should the federal injunction be lifted in the future, this clause will be applicable and enforceable, and prompt compliance will be required.

3.7 Notice of Sherman Antitrust Act – Federal Antitrust Enforcement This solicitation is subject to the Sherman Antitrust Act which prohibits agreements among competitors to fix prices, rig bids, or engage in other anticompetitive activity. Criminal prosecution of Sherman Act violations is the responsibility of the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice.

Violation of the Sherman Act is a felony punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment and a $1 million fine for individuals and a fine of up to $100 million for corporations. In addition, collusion among competitors may also involve violations of the mail or wire fraud statute, the false statements statute, or other federal felony statutes, all of which the Antitrust Division prosecutes.

In addition to receiving a criminal sentence, a corporation or individual convicted of a Sherman Act violation may be ordered to make restitution to the victims for all overcharges. Victims of bid-rigging and price-fixing conspiracies also may seek civil recovery of up to three times the amount of damages suffered.

(END OF RFP DOCUMENT)

https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/use-road-diesel-fueled-fleets-regulation