SF-30 Amendment 01.doc

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

Page Of Pages

U.S. Department of Labor

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management (OASAM) 170 S Independence Mall West Philadelphia, PA 19106

SAME

08-JC-REG2-POTOM

FORMCHECKBOX

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

June 5,, 2008

FORMCHECKBOX

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

FORMCHECKBOX

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FORMCHECKBOX

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers FORMCHECKBOX is extended, FORMCHECKBOX is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

Not Applicable

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

FORMCHECKBOX

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

FORMCHECKBOX

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor FORMCHECKBOX is not, FORMCHECKBOX is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.

The time and date for receipt of proposals remains the same at 3:00 pm Eastern time on March 5, 2009.

The following additional information is provided:

A. For purposed of this RFP, the inflationary rate used in projecting costs shall be 1.4%. This percentage should be inserted at the top of p. 117, under para 5, Option Extension Information.

B. Attached please find a revised National Staff Compensation report. The start date has been corrected to reflect Oct 1, 2009. (the original form may be corrected and used by the offeror).

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

FORMTEXT

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Gail Thomsen, Contracting Officer

Phila Regional Office, OASAM

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

15C. DATE SIGNED

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Gail Thomsen

16C. DATE SIGNED

2/20/09

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

1. Does the Center currently hold an accreditations and/or CTT related certifications, such as NCCER, SACS, COE, etc. that are currently in the reaccreditation process?

Answer: No, none are in the reaccreditation process.

2. Does the Center currently have any MOUs or MOAs in place with local secondary or post-secondary providers for concurrent GED/HSD services, ACT programs, or OCT programs? If so, will these MOUs or MOAs be provided?

Answer: The center has MOU's currently in place for the ACT/OCT programs. These include: Morehead State University, Big Sandy Community & Technical College, Pikeville College, and National College. There is also a MOU established with Paintsville School District and Penn Foster On-Line HSD program for High School Diploma's. Copies of MOU's will not be provided since operators would be required to develop their own MOU's.

3. What is the DOL approved Option Year 3 Center Operations funding level for the current Perkins JCC contract?

The total estimated cost and fee for the 5th year of the current Perkins contract is $6,804,163.

4. Does the Center currently provide any services for non-residential students to attain Child/Day Care services?

Center does not have any agreements in place for the provision of child/day care services for non-residential students.

5. Page 10 - Some trades (e.g. Security) are not listed on the CTT-10 or the slots are not aligned. Clarify trade changes approved over the past year.

The trades listed on in the RFP will be in effect at the start of the new contract.

6. Page 11 - Clarify if there is a distinct difference between ACT and OCT slots to make up the 20 slots or are they interchangable?

10 slots each: 10 OCT and 10 ACT

7. Page 11 - Clarify who provides the Auto and Welding OCT program training for the center.

Big Sandy Community & Technical College

8. Page 21 - Capital (CRA) was included as an estimated costs. Please advise if there are any approved and funded national projects scheduled within 90 days of the transition.

There are no National Projects scheduled

9. Page 105 - The page count for the SRP is still 15 pages, but the RFP is asking more regarding corporate G&A staff resources. Will the page count be increased?

Page limit for the SRP proposal is increased to 25 pages.

10. Page 121 - Clarify "your new vision" versus DOL's "new vision." Should we address how we intend to address the New Vision of Job Corps?

This question asks offerors to delineate how they will operationalize New Vision initiatives at the Perkins center.

11. Page 126 - Is there a breakdown of weights between clear, tailored, and effective or are they equally rated?

The three criteria are equally weighted

12. Page 127 - Same as above for the oral presentation.

The three criteria are equally weighted

END OF AMENDMENT