3- DRAFT Task Order Exhibit A 05-21-07.doc

EXHIBIT A

NATIONAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

TASK ORDER SUBCONTRACT

QUANTITIES, PRICES AND DATA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM FORM TITLE

PAGE

2Form A Consideration Schedule

11Form B Subcontractor and Vendor List

12Form C Evaluation Criteria

16Form D Past Performance Questionnaire

18Form E Administrative and Technical Data

20Form F Demonstrated Experience

21Form G Experience Statement

22Form H Lower-Tier Subcontractor Experience Statement

23Form I Project Approach

24Form J Key Personnel

25Form K Exceptions and Deviations

26Form L Attachment A - Labor Categories Descriptions

SERVICES SUBCONTRACT

QUANTITIES, PRICES AND DATA

Form A Consideration Schedule

1. FIXED PRICE TASKS

Unit prices quoted in the Schedule of Quantities, Prices and Data shall be firm all-inclusive unit prices to include all travel. Payment of the unit prices shall constitute full payment for performance of Work and shall cover all costs of whatever nature incurred by Subcontractor in accomplishing the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Subcontract.

A) Tasks to be accomplished and funded annually:

Table I

ITEMS 1 – 8 - ANNUAL Tasks

through June 30, 2011

B) Tasks to be accomplished and funded on an as needed basis:

Table II ITEM 9- 18 As needed tasks

through June 30, 2011

2.

UNIT BILLING TASKS OR

2. Ta Proposed Unit Billing Prices for the following Tasks quoted in the Pricing Table of this Schedule shall be firm all-inclusive unit prices including travel. Payment of the unit prices shall constitute full payment for performance of Work and shall cover all costs of whatever nature incurred by Subcontractor in accomplishing the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Subcontract.

A) Tasks to be accomplished as needed:

(UNIT BILLING)

1) review and analysis of the pension plan investment objectives

2) the strategies employed to achieve those objectives;

3) methods used to monitor execution of those strategies and the achievement of the investment objectives;

4) comparable analysis of the objectives and performance of other comparable pension plans.

Consideration Schedule

July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009

Extended Amount

Unburdened

Hourly Rates Fully Burdened hourly Labor Rates

Consideration Schedule

July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010

Unburdened

Fully Burdened hourly Labor Rates

Consideration Schedule

July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011

Unburdened

Fully Burdened hourly Labor Rates

Consideration Schedule

July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012

Unburdened

Fully Burdened hourly Labor Rates

Consideration Schedule

July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013

Unburdened

Fully Burdened hourly Labor Rates

Grand Total of All Years

GRAND TOTALS

3. PAYMENT TERMS

Enter any prompt payments discount or Net 30 Days .

4. FUNDING LIMITATION

For Task Orders issued under this Subcontract, the total payment for each Task Order shall not exceed the estimated value of the Task Order without a written revision to such Task Order.

Form B Subcontractor and Vendor List Subcontractor shall employ the following lower-tier subcontractors in performance of the work and/or vendors who will furnish major components, materials or equipment:

If no lower-tier subcontracts or purchases are anticipated, enter the word “NONE”.

NOTES: *

1.

TERMS: Enter Lump Sum, Unit Price, etc.

2.

SB/SDB /WOSB:

Enter SB for Small Business, SDB for Small Disadvantaged Business, and WOSB for Woman-Owned Small Business.

Form C Evaluation Criteria

1.

The CONTRACTOR intends to award one or more subcontracts resulting from this RFP to the responsible SUBCONTRACTORS whose proposals conforming to the RFP will be most advantageous to the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR reserves the right to determine that proposals are outside the competitive range at any time during the evaluation process. SUBCONTRACTOR’S whose proposals are determined to be outside the competitive range will be promptly notified. CONTRACTOR also reserves the right to:

(i) Make an award without entering into discussions with SUBCONTRACTOR (other than discussions conducted for the purpose of minor clarifications);

(ii) Reject any and all proposals;

(iii) Award to other than the lowest SUBCONTRACTOR;

(iv) Waive informalities and minor irregularities;

(v) Negotiate further with any SUBCONTRACTOR(s) in regard to price, terms, delivery schedules, conditions and general provisions and clarify any proposal.

Accordingly, all SUBCONTRACTOR’S are cautioned to submit their best offer with their initial proposal and to complete and submit all required documents.

2.

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

In addition to the evaluation of each SUBCONTRACTOR’S proposal, CONTRACTOR will consider each SUBCONTRACTOR’S adherence to the terms and conditions. All Exceptions and Deviations will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

3.

EVALUATION METHOD BEST VALUE

This procurement will use a Best Value process assessing merit factors as well as price/cost. This selection process will allow tradeoffs among cost/price and non-cost factors allowing CONTRACTOR to accept other than the lowest priced proposal. Proposals will be rated using a scoring system which depicts how well the SUBCONTRACTOR’S proposal meets the evaluation standards and RFP requirements.

The CONTRACTOR will select the SUBCONTRACTOR whose proposal is technically acceptable and whose technical and price relationship is most advantageous to the CONTRACTOR and the Government. The CONTRACTOR will award to a SUBCONTRACTOR, other than the lowest responsive and responsible SUBCONTRACTOR, if evaluation renders that SUBCONTRACTOR to be sufficiently superior from a technical standpoint so as to warrant payment by the CONTRACTOR of a premium (i.e., difference in price between the superior proposal and lower responsive proposals) for such superiority. The proposed price between SUBCONTRACTOR’S in the competitive range, especially between proposals which have fairly equal technical ratings, may be the major deciding factor in the selection of multiple proposals for award, unless the CONTRACTOR determines, after evaluation, that only one SUBCONTRACTOR is capable of providing the services.

The following criteria will be used as the basis of award:

Scored Criteria

The following Criteria will be evaluated and scored. The scored criteria are listed in descending order of importance. Criterion 1, Demonstrated Company Experience, Criterion 2, Project Approach and Criterion 3 Key Personnel are equal in importance. Criterion 4, Past Performance is of least importance.

NOTE: Failure of the SUBCONTRACTOR to provide complete information may impair the CONTRACTOR's ability to accurately evaluate the proposal, resulting in potentially lower scores for one or more of the Criteria described below.

Scored Criteria Criterion 1: Demonstrated Experience

The OFFEROR shall demonstrate company experience by providing the following at a minimum:

1. OFFEROR must demonstrate its knowledge, skill and experience (minimum 10 years) and, if applicable, its lower-tier subcontractor(s) knowledge, skill and experience with projects involving plan administration, research and analysis, legislative compliance, and actuarial services for defined benefit and defined contribution plans.

2. OFFEROR shall provide a minimum of two relevant project examples and include Project Description, Proposed Solution, and Benefit.

3. OFFEROR must demonstrate its knowledge, skill and experience in providing reliable and experienced investment counsel and advice related to market conditions, investment or fund manager performance, and economic environments to pension plan Investment Committees, including references. OFFEROR shall provide samples of studies conducted, research performed, and reports prepared.

The OFFEROR will be evaluated on how it will use this level of knowledge, skill and experience to ensure Contractor meets all legally required and fiduciary obligations. OFFEROR will also be evaluated on the type of educational opportunities or training it has provided to Investment Committees and Benefits staffs, including newsletters (electronic or hard-copy), on-site training, seminars, conferences, etc. Use Forms, Experience Statement, and Lower-tier Subcontract Experience Statement (if applicable). The technical evaluation will focus heavily on demonstrated experience and results on subcontracts of similar work and plans of similar size and complexity.

Criterion 2:

Project Approach

The OFFEROR shall demonstrate its project approach by providing the following at a minimum:

1. The OFFEROR shall describe its approach as to how it will assist CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTOR’s Benefits Committee in administering its defined benefit and defined contribution plans in accordance with NSTec’s contract with the Department of Energy, plan documents, and other legal requirements.

2. The OFFEROR shall describe in detail its actuarial support proficiencies (including systems) that ensure the accuracy of records maintained, data reported, and that required studies and other reports are completed in accordance with appropriate regulations.

3. The OFFEROR shall describe research and analysis capabilities and project approach to be used to be able to respond to requests for plan or legislative interpretations, guidance, or other ad hoc requests for information with a short turn-around time.

4. The OFFEROR shall also provide details on the Investment Consulting approach it will use to ensure that appropriate advice, guidance, and fund and investment management performance evaluations and other studies are provided to the NSTec Benefits Committee on its defined benefit and defined contribution plans. The approach should include size and depth of staff, system capabilities to conduct investment performance analyses and benchmarking studies, and investment manager or mutual fund searches.

An approach that demonstrates an understanding of the services required, that shows an in-depth knowledge of legislative requirements, uses appropriate benchmarks, and shows that the OFFEROR has the resources and systems available to respond to requirements will be scored higher. The technical evaluation will also assess the likelihood that this approach will provide the basis for maintaining program continuity, uninterrupted work of high quality, and availability of competent professional employees for required services.

Criterion 3:

Key Personnel

The OFFEROR shall address at a minimum:

1. The OFFEROR shall provide the resumes of the Key Personnel that are proposed on this account. Form “Resumes of Key Personnel” shall be used for providing this information.

2. The OFFEROR shall demonstrate that proposed Key Personnel are qualified in supporting all facets of employee benefit plans, possess the appropriate certification requirements, as well as the understanding of all legal requirements in administering defined benefit and defined contribution plans and possess the skill and ability to effectively plan, manage, and complete the work required.

The OFFEROR’s Key Personnel will be evaluated on their requisite skills and appropriate background for the specific positions for which they are proposed. The evaluation of Key Personnel will focus on the individuals’ education, professional credentials, and experience relevant to the Statement of Work. The OFFERORS with Key Personnel who have demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the objectives and requirements identified in the Statement of Work and their ability to retain personnel will be scored higher.

Criterion 4:

Past Performance: The OFFEROR must identify past performance under existing and prior contracts for similar projects at similar value and plan size and complexity. Similar projects include where the OFFEROR has provided sound pension plan, actuarial, and investment consulting services for defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans. Projects to be evaluated also include special studies performed and governance audits conducted. Use the enclosed Past Performance Questionnaire. Provide this questionnaire to at least five of your clients and have them return the form as indicated. Proposers are cautioned to include all projects of a similar or reasonably similar nature for at least the previous 10 year period. The evaluation will focus on the degree of customer satisfaction, quality of work performed, timeliness of performance, and cost control. Past performance that shows where the OFFEROR has demonstrated a “Benefit or Cost Savings” to their customer will result in a higher ranking for the OFFEROR The OFFEROR will include in its proposal the list of companies selected to submit a Past Performance Questionnaire, including the company name, address, and phone number.

For each criterion or sub-criterion the evaluator shall assign an adjective rating with a corresponding numerical rating within the range indicated (below). This will be the basis for determining how many of the available points will be assigned to each proposal for each criterion.

Superior (81-100) - Significantly exceeds desired performance or capability in a beneficial way; substantial and clearly defined response; an innovative response; has no weaknesses.

Exceptional (61-80) - Exceeds specified performance or capability in a beneficial way; a substantial and clearly defined response; has value added features; has no significant weakness.

Acceptable (41-60) - Meets desired requirements; all critical criteria met; proof of experience supplied; has good probability of satisfying the requirement; any weaknesses can be readily corrected.

Marginal (21-40) - Fails to meet evaluation standards; unacceptable deviation from desired requirements; there is not sufficient data to permit a comprehensive evaluation; the proposal does not provide a good match to requirements; has low probability of satisfying the requirement.

Unacceptable (0-20) - Fails to meet minimum requirements; gross deficiencies from desired requirements; gross lack of understanding of requirements; would require a major revision to make the proposal acceptable.

Although price will not be scored, it can be the determining factor between proposals within the competitive range.

4.

PREPARATION OF PROPOSAL (Technical and Pricing)

Written Proposals shall be submitted to arrive at this office by the date and time specified in the RFP cover letter. Proposals shall be submitted on the forms furnished, or copies thereof, and must be manually signed. No erasures are permitted. If changes appear on the forms, the erroneous information must have a single line drawn through the information, and be initialed and dated by the person signing the proposal.

Proposals must be submitted in separate volumes as identified in Exhibit A, Form “Administrative and Technical Data”. The proposal shall contain all pertinent information requested in sufficient detail to permit a thorough evaluation. If the requested information is not located in the proper section, the information may be considered omitted.

Written Proposals will be evaluated as set forth in paragraph 3 above.

[List any requirements of how you want the proposals provided, such as “The technical [or price] proposal shall include the following components: a. Table of contents, b. List of tables and figures, c. All pages, including tables and figures, shall be numbered, d. Short introduction, e. The technical proposal should clearly address each of the technical proposal evaluation criteria in paragraph above. It should be presented in as much detail as practical and include the following as a minimum: (list the technical evaluation criteria here again, but provide more detail of what you want)].

Form D Past Performance Questionnaire

Upon completion please return to:

National Security Technologies, LLC

Attention: Jeanette Matthews, CF018

PO Box 98521

Las Vegas, NV 89193-8521

RFP: 001PP-JM-08

Fax: 702-295-2088

Firm Name: [Insert the name of the Firm being evaluated] Contract Number: [Insert No.] The above noted firm’s past performance is being assessed for technical evaluation purposes. You are requested to complete the following and fax or mail to the above noted address no later than [insert date]. Additional comments are welcome. Provide additional sheets if necessary.

Please provide a brief narrative/description of the services provided or product furnished, including contract period of performance, type of contract (firm fixed price, cost plus, etc.), and contract award amount:

Were there any Benefit or Cost Savings associated with this contract?

YES

NO

Please describe:

Were there any change orders made to this contract?

If yes, please explain:

Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?

Please describe the circumstances:

Was the quality compliant with the contract requirements? (i.e. accuracy of reports, technical excellence, quality control, etc.)

Additional Comments:

Was the project completed/delivered on time, and within budget?

Additional Comments:

How effective was the contractor in the following areas:

Excellent = 4 Exceeded Minimum Requirements Good = 3 Met Minimum Requirements

Fair = 2

Less than Minimum Requirements with Satisfactory Results Poor = 1 Did not meet minimum requirements Responsive to Customer Needs

Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel

Additional Comments:

How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?

EXCEPTIONAL SATISFACTORY POOR

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _____________________________________________________________

Name & Date

Company

Title

Address

Phone

Address

Note: This form is for evaluation and will not be part of the subcontract.

Form E Administrative and Technical Data

OFFEROR shall submit the following data with their proposal via the NNSA eSourcing Service at https://www.sourcingservice.com/nnsa.

Volume 1- Price Proposal:

1. Subcontractor’s Proposal Letter, signed and dated. (Include IRS Form W-9)

2. Exhibit A, Form (Consideration Schedule)

3. Exhibit A, Form (Subcontractor and Vendor List) * [Note a copy of this form is to be included in Volume 1 with “value” (prices). And in all other volumes without “value” (prices)]

4. Exhibit A, Form (Past Performance Questionnaire) List of firms, including points of contact with phone numbers, who were sent a Past Performance Questionnaire to complete.

5. Exhibit A, Form (Exceptions and Deviations) * [Note a copy of this form is to be included in both Volume 1 and Volume 2.]

6. Exhibit D, Attachment - Organizational Conflicts of Interest Questionnaire and Representations or Disclosure Form.

7. Preliminary Subcontracting Plan (Exhibit D, “SUBCONTRACTING PLAN”) If you are a large business, you will be required to submit your Subcontracting Plan for approval by the CONTRACTOR, prior to award. (See Special Condition titled, “SUBCONTRACTING PLAN” and in accordance with FAR Clause 52.219-9 – Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women‑Owned Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

Volume 2 – Technical Proposal:

Technical Proposal – No cost information is to be included in technical proposal. Proposal shall not merely offer to perform work in accordance with the special conditions, but shall explain how the OFFEROR plans to accomplish the requirements.

The technical proposal shall include the following components:

a. Table of contents

b. Subcontractor and Vendor List

c. Demonstrated Experience

d. Project Approach

e. Key Personnel

f. Past Performance

g. List of all attachments

h. All pages shall be numbered

i. Font size 10 or greater The technical proposal should clearly address each of the technical proposal evaluation criteria in Form C, paragraph 3. It should be presented in as much detail as practical and include the following as a minimum:

1. Exhibit A, Form (Subcontractor List). * [Note a copy of this form is to be included in all Volumes without “value” (prices)]

2. Exhibit A, Form (Past Performance Questionnaire) List of firms, including points of contact with phone numbers, who were sent a Past Performance Questionnaire to complete.

3. Exhibit A, Forms (Demonstrated Experience and Experience Statement).

4. Exhibit A, Form (Lower-Tier Subcontractor Experience Statement).

5. Exhibit A, Form (Project Approach).

6. Exhibit A, Form Resumes of Key Personnel Assigned to this account.

7. Exhibit A, Form (Exceptions and Deviations) * [Note a copy of this form is to be included in both Volume 1 and Volume 2.] NOTE: This form is for proposal evaluation and will not be part of the subcontract.

Form F Demonstrated Experience

The OFFEROR shall describe its Demonstrated Experience not to exceed 50 pages. The OFFEROR shall provide at a minimum:

1. OFFEROR must demonstrate its knowledge, skill and experience (minimum 10 years) and, if applicable, its lower-tier subcontractor(s) knowledge, skill and experience with projects involving plan administration, research and analysis, legislative compliance, and actuarial services for defined benefit and defined contribution plans.

2. OFFEROR shall provide a minimum of two relevant project examples and include Project Description, Proposed Solution, and Benefit.

3. OFFEROR must demonstrate its knowledge, skill and experience in providing reliable and experienced investment counsel and advice related to market conditions, investment or fund manager performance, and economic environments to pension plan Investment Committees, including references. OFFEROR shall provide samples of studies conducted, research performed, and reports prepared.

NOTE:

This form is for proposal evaluation and will not be part of the subcontract.

Form G Experience Statement

The offeror submits the following statement as to its experience qualifications. In the case of a joint venture, separate forms will be submitted for previous experience of the joint venture and the experience of each party of the joint venture.

This company has been engaged in the contracting business under its present business name for years.

Experience in work of a nature similar in type and magnitude to that set forth in the Statement of Work (SOW) extends over a period of years.

All awarded contracts have been satisfactorily completed, except as follows (name any and all exceptions and reasons therefore, attaching additional pages if necessary):

The following contracts, covering work similar in type and magnitude to that set forth in the SOW, has been satisfactorily completed within the last 5 years or are now in progress for the following owners or prime contractors.

NOTE:

This form is for proposal evaluation and will not be part of the subcontract.

Form H Lower-Tier Subcontractor Experience Statement This statement of experience qualifications is submitted for the following lower-tier subcontractor or supplier. In the case of multiple lower-tier subcontractors or suppliers, separate forms will be submitted for previous experience of each lower-tier subcontractor or supplier.

ADDRESS:

This company has been engaged in the contracting business under its present business name for years.

Experience in work of a nature similar in type and magnitude to that set forth in the Statement of Work (SOW) extends over a period of years.

Awarded contracts have been satisfactorily completed, except as follows (name any and all exceptions and reasons therefore, attaching additional pages if necessary):

NOTE: This form is for proposal evaluation and will not be part of the subcontract.

Form I Project Approach The OFFEROR shall describe its approach, not to exceed 50 pages, as to how the OFFEROR will provide the pension plan administrative, actuarial, and investment consulting services it will provide to NSTec.

The OFFEROR shall address at a minimum:

1. The OFFEROR shall describe its approach as to how it will assist CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTOR’s Benefits Committee in administering its defined benefit and defined contribution plans in accordance with NSTec’s contract with the Department of Energy, plan documents, and other legal requirements.

2. The OFFEROR shall describe in detail its actuarial support proficiencies (including systems) that ensure the accuracy of records maintained, data reported, and that required studies and other reports are completed in accordance with appropriate regulations.

3. The OFFEROR shall describe research and analysis capabilities and project approach to be used to be able to respond to requests for plan or legislative interpretations, guidance, or other ad hoc requests for information with a short turn-around time.

4. The OFFEROR shall also provide details on the Investment Consulting approach it will use to ensure that appropriate advice, guidance, and fund and investment management performance evaluations and other studies are provided to the NSTec Benefits Committee on its defined benefit and defined contribution plans. The approach should include size and depth of staff, system capabilities to conduct investment performance analyses and benchmarking studies, and investment manager or mutual fund searches.

[PN: Assess the need to have the Offeror submit this information. If Project Organization is an evaluation criteria, include this Form in the RFP.] NOTE: This form is for evaluation and will not be part of the Subcontract.

Form J Key Personnel

The OFFEROR shall address at a minimum:

1. The OFFEROR shall provide the resumes of the Key Personnel that are proposed on this account. Form “Resumes of Key Personnel” shall be used for providing this information. [PN: Assess the need to have the Offeror submit this information. If Key Personnel is an evaluation criteria, include this Form in the RFP.]Offeror to provide a resume for each key person to be assigned to the Subcontract, containing at least the following information on each person (attached and properly designate additional pages, if necessary.)

2. The OFFEROR shall demonstrate that proposed Key Personnel are qualified in supporting all facets of employee benefit plans, possess the appropriate certification requirements, as well as the understanding of all legal requirements in administering defined benefit and defined contribution plans and possess the skill and ability to effectively plan, manage, and complete the work required.

1. TITLE:

2. NAME:

3. EDUCATION/QUALIFICATIONS:

4. PRESENT POSITION IN Offeror’s COMPANY:

5. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE:

6. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY:

7. CITIZENSHIP:

NOTE: This form is for evaluation purposes only and will not be a part of the Subcontract.

Form K Exceptions and Deviations

Offeror submits herein any exceptions and deviations Offeror wishes to make to any part of the proposal documents, taking care to refer precisely to which part of the proposal documents the exception or deviation is being made. All exceptions and deviations shall be submitted in the form of amendments to the proposal documents and must be listed separately by each Exhibit. No exceptions or deviations to the proposal documents shall be recognized unless expressly set forth herein and all other terms and conditions of the proposal documents remain in full force and effect except as recognized herein.

In addition, any special or unique terms and/or conditions that the Offeror wants considered must be provided with the proposal. Attempting to provide this type of information after the proposal due date may preclude the proposal from further consideration.

failure to comPlete this form may be cause for rejection of offeror’s proposal

FORMCHECKBOX

No Exceptions

FORMCHECKBOX

Exceptions taken are detailed below or on a separate sheet

No. Reference

Exception or Deviation

Reason

NOTES:

List the Request for Proposal document location under the column above entitled “Reference” to which any proposed exception or deviation applies (e.g.: Exhibit B, Section 5.2.1, etc.).

Under the “Reason” column, list the reason(s) for each exception or deviation proposed by the Offeror. Offerors are requested to keep their reasoning language as short as possible.

This form is for proposal evaluation and will not be a part of the Subcontract. Acceptable exceptions and deviations will be incorporated into the appropriate Subcontract Documents.

Form L Attachment A - Labor Categories Descriptions

Project Manager – Shall possess an MBA, MPA or related Master s degree, or equivalent work experience at a senior management level. Shall have demonstrated experience in working with or consulting with Retirement/Benefit programs, and/or equivalent experience in management, operations, or organizational consultation relative to the Retirement/Benefit industry; shall be considered an expert in this field; shall be responsible for quality control, utilization review, and oversight of projects and final report review/approval.

Senior Consultant - Shall possess a PhD, MBA, and/or equivalent work experience at a senior management level. Shall have extensive experience working with or consulting with Retirement/Benefit programs, and/or equivalent experience in management, operations, or organizational consultation relative to the Retirement/Benefit programs industry; shall be responsible for managing external quality and developing client strategy.

Consultant - Shall possess a Master s degree in Mathematics, Statistics, Computer Science, Economics, Finance, Business, other Liberal Arts, or equivalent work experience; Shall have experience working with or consulting with Retirement/Benefit programs, and/or equivalent experience in management, operations, or organizational consultation relative to the Retirement/Benefit industry; must have must be able to lead analytic teams in the analysis and synthesis of qualitative and quantitative information.

Analyst - Shall have a Bachelor s degree in Mathematics, Statistics, Computer Science, Economics, Finance, Business, or other Liberal Arts; shall possess strong command of relevant spreadsheet/database software; shall have demonstrated proficiency in analytical and mathematical skills; must have firm understanding of key Retirement/Benefit issues.

Support Staff - Shall be well versed in and have advanced skills in the editorial peer review process, including proofreading, grammar, spelling, editing, and formatting; must be able to work simultaneously on numerous projects; must possess strong skills relevant to word processing and spreadsheet software.

Task Order Exhibit A Solicitation No. 001PP-JM-08

Retirement Benefit Program Subcontract No.

10/30/07