00011958_Score Matrix~1.pdf

PDF 108 KB Posted

Attached to
FACILITATION FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG POLICY COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCESS
Solicitation number
S-44300-00011957
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This is a Proposal Evaluation Score Matrix for a facilitation services contract issued by the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Alcohol and Drug Policy Commission (ADPC). The procurement sought a contractor to provide comprehensive facilitation services for developing the 2026 ADPC Comprehensive Plan, including support for commission committees, focus groups, and regional town halls with trauma-informed and culturally responsive practices. The proposal deadline was December 2, 2024, with an initial contract term of 13 months and potential renewals extending up to 5 years. The RFP required detailed submissions including comprehensive work plans, key personnel resumes, and line-item budgets. Evaluation of the nine proposing firms was conducted using two primary scoring criteria: firm expertise and experience (weighted at 75 points maximum) and cost proposals (weighted at 25 points maximum), for a total possible score of 100 points.

The evaluation results ranked the proposers as follows: Jennifer Kotting LLC achieved the highest score of 86 points, followed by District Partnerships & Consulting with 85 points, Empress Rules Equity Consulting with 76 points, TRIPOINT SOLUTIONS LLC with 64 points, CLT & Associates with 73 points, JEI Solutions LLC with 63 points, Alvarez & Marsal Holdings, LLC with 53 points, The Needs Languages with 44 points, and IAM Grants Consulting, LLC with the lowest score of 28 points. The contract carried a not-to-exceed compensation of $250,000, though specific pricing information for individual proposals was not disclosed in this matrix. The procurement did not establish explicit set-aside designations for disadvantaged enterprises. According to the related Intent to Award documentation, Third Horizon Strategies was selected as the successful proposer, suggesting either a separate evaluation process or that the named contractor was chosen outside the nine firms evaluated in this matrix.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
6037 Full RFP.docx DOCX document
6037 Intent to award~1.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Proposal Evaluation Detail Scores 9

Maximum Score Evaluator 2

1 Alvarez & Marsal Holdings, LLC

3.5.2.1 - Expertise of Firm 75 50

3.5.2.2 - Price 25 3

TOTAL 100 53 53

2 CLT & Associates

2.2.1 Specific Experience of Key Staff 75 65

2.2.4 Cost Proposal 25 8

TOTAL 100 73 73

3 District Partnerships & Consulting

3.5.2.1 - Expertise of Firm 75 60

3.5.2.2 - Price 25 25

TOTAL 100 85 85

4 Empress Rules Equity Consulting

3.5.2.1 - Expertise of Firm 75 68

3.5.2.2 - Price 25 8

TOTAL 100 76 76

5 IAM Grants Consulting, LLC

3.5.2.1 - Expertise of Firm 75 20

3.5.2.2 - Price 25 8

TOTAL 100 28 28

6 JEI Solutions LLC

2.2.1 Specific Experience of Key Staff 75 55

2.2.4 Cost Proposal 25 8

TOTAL 100 63 63

7 Jennifer Kotting LLC

3.5.2.1 - Expertise of Firm 75 72

3.5.2.2 - Price 25 14

TOTAL 100 86 86

8 The Needs Languages

3.5.2.1 - Expertise of Firm 75 30

3.5.2.2 - Price 25 14

TOTAL 100 44 44

9 TRIPOINT SOLUTIONS LLC

3.5.2.1 - Expertise of Firm 75 55

3.5.2.2 - Price 25 9

TOTAL 100 64 64

EVALUATION SCORE DETAILS

# Level 3 - Restricted

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .