A7_Technical_Selection_Plan.docx

113 KB Posted

Attached to
Park NX20 Complete AFM System
Solicitation number
0000327571
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
BAA_Certification_(D5).pdf PDF
Green On Site Services Rider (March 2021.pdf PDF
Certificate of Insurance (Example).pdf PDF
FPSS_Terms_and_Conditions.pdf PDF
Reps and Certs-Rider-Feb 2018.pdf PDF
COVID-19 Rider for Onsite_Contractors_November_2021.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

SOURCE SELECTION PLAN AND EVALUATION FORM

FOR TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE LOW PRICE PROCUREMENT

Requisition #: 327571

Short Description: Park NX20 Complete AFM System

Estimated Value: $234,575.00 Source Selection Plan Type: Lowest Price Technically Acceptable

SOURCE SELECTION TEAM:

Source Selection Authority: Katherine Coh Nano-X Small Equipment Chair: Anne E. Sakdinawat Technical Team Evaluator: Anne E. Sakdinawat Business Team Evaluator: Angela M. Garcia

TECHNICAL EVALUATION:

Technical Factors

Evaluation Criteria Vendor A Acceptable / Unacceptable Vendor B Acceptable / Unacceptable Vendor C Acceptable / Unacceptable Vendor D Acceptable / Unacceptable

1. Provide technical description of the process, qualifications and materials used
Acceptable: Conforms with specs provided by Park Systems

Not Acceptable: Does not conform with specs provided by Park Systems

2.

Allows for SLAC visit to conduct special program review

Acceptable: Conforms with visit request Not Acceptable: Does not allow visit request

3. Provide a short description of quality control plan/procedure
Acceptable: Provide a quality control plan (visual inspection is acceptable)

Non Acceptable: Did not meet SLAC requirements above

4. Provide schedule or duration of the project that includes delivery. Indicate period of performance for 14 months
Acceptable: Schedule shows an overview at least project duration

Non Acceptable: No schedule or duration stated in offer

5. Provide a list of past performance on similar projects within the last 5years
Acceptable: At least one project of similar scope

Not Acceptable: Does not conform specs and drawings

BUSINESS EVALUATION:

Business Factors
Evaluation Criteria
Vendor A

Acceptable / Unacceptable Vendor B Acceptable / Unacceptable Vendor C Acceptable / Unacceptable Vendor D Acceptable / Unacceptable

1. Price

SIGNATURES:

(TECHNICAL) SSEB CHAIR:

BUSINESS EVALUATOR:

SOURCE SELECTION AUTHORITY:

LTU Stands - SSP image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .