UNSPSC 50483269: Tuxedo corn purees

The variety of corn known as tuxedo corn which have been pureed.

UNSPSC 50483269 Tuxedo corn purees, a Commodity code, appears in state and local procurement with minimal recent activity and misaligned scope. The source records show only two solicitations explicitly naming corn or corn products — one Oregon Department of Corrections canned-tomato ITB and one Texas HHS supplemental food procurement listing 210 line items across diverse categories. The remaining opportunities span school nutrition programs, state institutional food service, and specialty fresh produce across multiple states, but none name tuxedo corn purees or corn puree products as a distinct line item or focus. The code's abstract framing does not map to the concrete work actually solicited under it in the recent block.

School districts in Georgia (Liberty County, Burke County, Savannah-Chatham County), Missouri (Rockwood R-VI), and Virginia (Fairfax County) issue the largest volume of recent food-service solicitations, typically as IFBs or RFPs for comprehensive annual grocery or produce contracts running July 1 through June 30. State institutional buyers — Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Oregon Department of Corrections, and the Illinois Veterans Home — procure in smaller, more specialized batches. The Texas HHS supplemental food procurement (HHS0017449, due July 13, 2026) covers state supported living centers and hospitals statewide with historical value of $1.5 million for the prior year; the Texas Department of Criminal Justice cafeteria food procurement (304T26300CF) spans approximately 382 line items across five warehouse locations. School-level solicitations typically span 60–900+ line items and explicitly require Buy American compliance, HACCP plans, whole-grain and low-sodium options, and delivery to multiple school sites. No solicitation in the block names tuxedo corn purees or identifies corn-based puree products as a specification. Geographic concentration is heaviest in Georgia and Texas; secondary activity appears in Illinois, Oregon, Virginia, and Missouri. Given the absence of substantive, on-code opportunities and the mismatch between the code's scope and recent procurement patterns, pursuit under this code warrants close attention to actual RFP line items rather than reliance on the UNSPSC classification alone.