UNSPSC 50391651: Organic tracy apricot purees

The variety of organic apricots known as organic tracy apricots which have been pureed.

UNSPSC 50391651 Organic tracy apricot purees is a Commodity code that does not align with the recent state and local opportunities posted under this classification. The sourced solicitations span canned applesauce, dried fruit bars, apple crisps, fresh produce, eggs, and broad food service supply contracts—none of which explicitly name organic apricot purees or tracy apricot varieties. State and local agencies posting under this code show purchasing activity focused on mainstream commodity and processed fruit products for school nutrition programs, correctional facilities, state health and human services institutions, and general food service operations rather than specialty organic fruit purees. The issuing bodies include state departments of corrections and health services, independent school districts, county school boards, city boards of education, and purchasing cooperatives across multiple states. The code shows active recent procurement but limited relevance to the nominal apricot puree scope.

Geographic activity spans Oregon (Department of Corrections applesauce bids in May and July 2026), Texas (health and human services food procurement, school district nutrition services, Texas Department of Criminal Justice), Georgia (county and school district produce and food service contracts), Connecticut (city board of education commodities), and Missouri (school district grocery and nutrition services). Representative recent solicitations include the Oregon Department of Corrections ITB S2910000017453 for canned fruit applesauce with a July 31, 2026 response date, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission IFB HHS0016792 for supplemental food and consumable products across state hospitals and supported living centers, and the Douglas County School System RFP SN 26-003 for food supply and distribution services with an estimated annual value of approximately $9,000,000. The disparity between the code name and actual procurement activity suggests either miscoding in the sourced opportunities or misalignment between the category definition and current buying patterns at state and local agencies.