UNSPSC 50386706: Focke dwarf raspberry purees

The variety of raspberries known as focke dwarf raspberry which have been pureed.

UNSPSC 50386706 Focke dwarf raspberry purees (Commodity) shows minimal relevant activity in recent state and local procurement. The code nominally designates a specific raspberry product, but recent opportunities tagged under this code span broad food-service categories bearing little connection to the code's narrow scope—canned applesauce, dried fruit bars, apple crisps, fresh produce, eggs, general grocery items, and supplemental food and consumables for schools, correctional facilities, and state-supported living centers. The issuing bodies include state departments of corrections and health and human services, county and independent school districts, and school nutrition programs across Oregon, Texas, Georgia, Missouri, and Connecticut.

The recent opportunities reveal a fundamental mismatch: the code name references a specialized product (Focke dwarf raspberry purees) that does not appear in any of the solicitations. Instead, the tagged opportunities represent general food procurement by correctional systems, school nutrition programs, and state health facilities, where pricing is typically firm and fixed, competitive bidding is required, and Buy American and domestic-content preferences often apply. Representative recent activity includes the Oregon Department of Corrections' canned-applesauce ITB (S2910000017453, due July 31, 2026) for 4,760 cases at an historical price of $21.84 per case, and the Texas Health and Human Services Commission's supplemental-food IFB (HHS0016792, due February 23, 2026, later extended) covering 210 line items of bread, frozen foods, dairy, and consumable supplies with a maximum potential value of $4.5 million over three years. School districts including Fairfax County (Virginia), Dallas Independent School District (Texas), and Rockwood R-VI (Missouri) issued RFPs and ITBs for master grocery, specialty foods, and grocery items throughout spring 2026, with response dates spanning March through May. The code shows no concentration among repeat buyers, no standout regional clustering, and a persistent disconnect between the code's nominal product scope and the actual work being solicited. This code likely reflects a tagging error in the state and local procurement database rather than genuine category activity.