UNSPSC 50386323: Earliqueen plum purees

The variety of plums known as earliqueen plums which have been pureed.

UNSPSC 50386323 Earliqueen plum purees (Commodity) shows minimal recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its nominal scope. The code's title suggests specialty fruit products, but the recent opportunities dataset contains no plum-puree solicitations. Instead, the opportunities tagged under this code span a broad range of food-service commodities for state institutions, school districts, and corrections agencies: canned applesauce, dried fruit bars, fresh produce, eggs, processed foods, and general grocery items for nutrition programs and institutional feeding operations.

State and local issuing bodies pursuing food-service procurement include departments of corrections (Oregon), state health and human services agencies (Texas), school districts (Austin ISD, Fairfax County, Rockwood R-VI, Liberty County, Muscogee County, Savannah-Chatham County, Douglas County, Dallas ISD, and Hancock County), city education departments (Bridgeport Board of Education), and special purchasing cooperatives (GEC Buying Cooperative serving 30 Georgia school districts). The breadth and frequency of school-district solicitations dominate the recent activity, reflecting ongoing nutrition-program procurement cycles tied to academic-year food-service contracts. Representative recent opportunities include the Oregon Department of Corrections ITB for canned applesauce (4,760 cases, due July 31, 2026), the Texas Health and Human Services Commission IFB for supplemental food and consumables statewide (210 line items, $4.5 million over three years, due February 23, 2026), and Fairfax County Public Schools IFB for Master Grocery K-12 (deliveries to 45 schools and seven distribution kitchens, contract term July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027, bids due April 27, 2026). Geographic activity spans Oregon, Texas, Georgia, Connecticut, Missouri, and Virginia; school-nutrition procurement is particularly active in Georgia and Texas. The code shows no plausible connection to its stated commodity; the mismatch suggests a tagging or taxonomy-mapping issue. Vendors pursuing institutional food-service opportunities under this code should focus on nutrition-program suppliers rather than specialty fruit producers.