UNSPSC 50354957: Frozen organic zeegrand nectarines

The variety of organic nectarines known as organic zeegrand nectarines that have been frozen for preservation.

UNSPSC 50354957 Frozen organic zeegrand nectarines is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment with recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a single product line—frozen organic zeegrand nectarines—but the most recent state and local solicitations tagged under this code are broad school nutrition procurements spanning hundreds of line items across frozen and fresh produce, grocery staples, dairy, meats, breads, and non-food supplies. The recent opportunities reflect what school districts and municipalities actually buy: comprehensive food service contracts that bundle disparate product categories rather than procuring a single specialty nectarine product. School districts and municipal purchasing offices dominate the issuing-body mix, with repeated solicitations from Georgia school systems (Douglas County, Hancock County, Early County, City Schools of Decatur, Savannah-Chatham County), Connecticut municipalities (City of Bridgeport), Missouri school districts (Rockwood R-VI), and a statewide Georgia procurement.

Recent activity concentrates in Georgia and the Southeast, with the most visible opportunities issued by Douglas County School System (RFP 26-003 for food supply and distribution, RFP 26-004 for fresh produce and eggs through the GEC Buying Cooperative, both due in late February and early March 2026), Hancock County Board of Education (IFB for fresh produce, due June 26, 2026), City Schools of Decatur (IFB for frozen foods and grocery, due May 15, 2026), and Savannah-Chatham County Public School System (Bid 2634 for fresh produce, due April 23, 2026). Additional activity appears in Missouri (Rockwood R-VI, bids due April 29, 2026), Connecticut (City of Bridgeport, bids due June 30, 2026), and Georgia statewide (state procurement for food, supplies, and other kitchen products, due June 22, 2026). The code itself is poorly matched to the work actually being procured; the mismatch suggests the code classification is either a system error or reflects only one component line item within much larger food service aggregations.