UNSPSC 50335364: Dried organic super lady peaches

The variety of organic peaches known as organic super lady peaches that have been dried for preservation.

UNSPSC 50335364 Dried organic super lady peaches, a Commodity code, nominally covers dried peach products but shows minimal recent state and local procurement activity aligned with that narrow scope. Recent school-district and state nutrition solicitations spanning fresh produce, cafeteria food products, and specialty dried fruits do not isolate dried organic super lady peaches as a line item; instead, school districts and state agencies are buying broad commodity baskets that include fresh fruits, proteins, dairy, grains, and processed foods under single RFP or IFB notices. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice issued an IFB for whole pitted dried prunes (bid IW236532, due February 20, 2026) and a much larger IFB for cafeteria food products spanning 382 line items across proteins, dairy, grains, and produce (IFB 304T-26-300CF, due May 4, 2026), but neither specifically names dried organic peaches. Hancock County Schools (Georgia) solicited over 200 line items of fresh produce for the 2026-27 school year (IFB #SN002-2027, due June 26, 2026), and the City of Bridgeport, Connecticut requested 115 line items including fruit and vegetable products (IFB BNB053266, due June 26, 2026), but both emphasized fresh rather than dried produce and did not enumerate dried organic super lady peaches as a distinct buy. The State of Georgia posted a food, supplies, and other kitchen products solicitation (PE55645NONST2026000000009, due June 22, 2026) with scope details in an attachment, but no public summary identifies dried organic peaches.

Geographic activity concentrates in Georgia, Connecticut, and Texas among recent postings, driven by school-district nutrition contracts and state department cafeteria procurement. The code shows no evidence of sustained standalone procurement for dried organic super lady peaches at the state or local level; when dried fruits appear, they are bundled within broad commodity categories rather than specified as a named line item. Business development firms evaluating this code should recognize that it does not align with current state and local solicitation patterns, which favor comprehensive produce and food-service RFPs over specialty dried-fruit line items.