UNSPSC 50334442: Dried organic temple oranges

A cross between a mandarin and a sweet orange that has been dried for preservation.

UNSPSC 50334442 Dried organic temple oranges, a Commodity code, does not align with the recent state and local procurement activity posted under this classification. The most recent opportunities tagged to this code are school nutrition and institutional food service solicitations covering broad fresh produce and commodity food items, but none specifically address dried organic temple oranges or other dried citrus products. Hancock County Schools in Georgia posted an IFB for fresh produce spanning over 200 line items including multiple citrus varieties (oranges, lemons, limes) for the 2026–27 school year with a bid opening on June 29, 2026; the City of Bridgeport, Connecticut requested bids for commodities including fruit and vegetable products for the Board of Education Nutrition Center with electronic submissions due June 26, 2026; the State of Georgia issued a general food, supplies, and kitchen products solicitation on May 15, 2026; and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice posted IFBs for cafeteria food products and dried prunes for institutional dining. None of these solicitations explicitly name dried temple oranges or specialty dried citrus as line items, and the code itself appears to represent a narrowly defined specialty produce item that does not generate measurable recent activity in state and local procurement records.

The issuing bodies active under this code include school districts, municipal governments, and state correctional and education agencies, primarily in Georgia, Connecticut, and Texas. The geographic footprint is sparse and limited to these three states in the recent record. Given the absence of documented state and local opportunities specifically for dried organic temple oranges or comparable dried citrus commodities, this code shows little relevant procurement activity. Business development professionals should verify whether this code is the correct classification for their offerings, as the mismatch between the code's nominal scope and actual institutional food service demand suggests either a data classification error or genuine lack of state and local procurement demand for this product category.