UNSPSC 50323659: Dried teroldego grapes

The variety of wine grapes known as teroldego grapes that have been dried for preservation.

UNSPSC 50323659 Dried teroldego grapes is a Commodity code that appears in state and local procurement systems but shows minimal recent activity aligned with its specific product scope. The recent opportunities in the source are consistently for broad food service contracting—fresh produce, grocery items, proteins, and dried fruits—issued by school districts, county boards of education, state departments, and correctional facilities across multiple states. None of the posted solicitations explicitly name dried teroldego grapes; instead, they solicit general fresh produce (apples, berries, vegetables), grocery staples, proteins, eggs, or dried fruits and nuts (raisins, cranberries, walnuts, pecans). The code's nominal scope—a specialized varietal of Italian dried grape—does not align with what state and local buyers are actually procuring under it in the current market.

Issuing bodies include school districts (Hancock County Schools in Georgia, Fairfax County Public Schools in Virginia, Rockwood R-VI School District in Missouri, Liberty County Board of Education in Georgia, Savannah-Chatham County Public School System in Georgia, Douglas County School System in Georgia), the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the County of Santa Clara in California, the State of Georgia, and the City of Bridgeport, Connecticut. Recent representative solicitations include Hancock County Schools' IFB for Fresh Produce SY27 (due June 26, 2026), the City of Bridgeport's Commodities IFB (due June 26, 2026), Fairfax County Public Schools' Master Grocery K-12 IFB (due April 27, 2026), and the County of Santa Clara's ITB for Dried Fruits and Nuts (due February 5, 2026). Geographic activity spans Georgia, Virginia, Missouri, Texas, Connecticut, and California, with heaviest recent concentration in Georgia school districts. The absence of teroldego-specific procurement, combined with the generic scope of concurrent food-service solicitations, suggests this code may be a taxonomy artifact rather than an active procurement lane for the specialized product it nominally describes.