UNSPSC 42183057: Eye movement monitors

In this classification, this commodity indicates a product that is a customized computer monitor that displays eye movement specific levels. US FDA regulates Eye movement monitors under 21 CFR 886.1510 and under FDA product code HLL. Most nations, for tariff and trade purposes, schedule these products under HS 852849.

UNSPSC 42183057 Eye movement monitors is a Commodity code that sees minimal alignment between its nominal scope and recent state and local purchasing activity. The recent opportunities tagged under this code reflect procurement of precision laboratory and utility-sector measurement equipment—a high-voltage capacitance test module, a spectrophotometer for waste-to-energy facility monitoring, and a cooperative purchasing vehicle for law enforcement equipment—none of which are eye movement monitors. State and local governments buying under this code appear to be utilities, solid waste and environmental agencies, and law enforcement coalitions, but the mismatch between the code's stated scope and the actual procurements suggests either inconsistent coding practice in these jurisdictions or that eye movement monitors themselves are rarely procured at the state and local level.

Recent activity is sparse and geographically scattered. The Kissimmee Utility Authority (Florida) issued an IFB on September 28, 2026 (due September 22, 2026) for an OMICRON CP TD12 Testing Module, a precision high-voltage measurement device with an anticipated contract value under $250,000. The City of Tampa issued an RFQ on June 25, 2026 (due June 12, 2026) for a Heck DR4900 Spectrophotometer replacement at its McKay Bay Waste to Energy facility. Sourcewell, a Minnesota cooperative purchasing vehicle, issued RFP #061626 on May 12, 2026 (due June 16, 2026) for law enforcement equipment on behalf of Franklin, Grant, Grays Harbor, Chelan, and Yakima Counties in Washington, plus other jurisdictions nationwide. The code shows little relevant recent activity and warrants investigation as to whether it remains an active procurement category or whether issuing bodies are mislabeling unrelated equipment purchases.