Replacing invasive cystoscopy with urine testing for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer surveillance
Active Project Grant Awarded Last action
- Award ID
- R37CA275916
- Recipient
-
Veterans Education And Research Association Of Northern New England, Inc. UEI HLLGHKT1WBF1
- Awarding agency
-
National Cancer Institute
National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
- Obligated
- $2,128,641
Award facts
- Assistance listing
- 93.394 Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research
- Completion date 64% complete
- Place of performance
- White River Junction, Hartford, VT, USA
Award details come from USAspending.gov.
Description
- Abstract
- There are ~800,000 bladder cancer survivors in the US, making IT the fifth most prevalent cancer. This study focuses on the largest group of patients with bladder cancer, the 79% with non-muscle invasive early-stage cancer. Per current guideline recommendations, these patients undergo transurethral endoscopic resection followed by surveillance cystoscopy every 3 to 6 months, making cystoscopy common with over a million procedures per year. Cystoscopy entails direct inspection of the bladder via a cystoscope that is inserted into a patient's urethra. IT can be quite uncomfortable as IT is performed in non-sedated patients. In spite of this burden on patients, high-quality data on the benefits of high-intensity surveillance cystoscopy are lacking. The experts writing the guidelines recognized the unclear benefit of high-intensity surveillance and specifically stated: "there is an urgent need for studies to determine if less stringent follow-up regimens can be employed without significantly affecting oncologic outcomes in these patients." replacing cystoscopy with less invasive urine testing is such a less stringent follow-up regimen. Preliminary data show that the urine tests xpert bladder cancer monitor (mrna-based) and bladder epicheck (DNA methylation test) may replace cystoscopy procedures, given their high sensitivities. However, with a specificity 0.76 and 0.84, up to one out of four tests may be false positive, so many patients still have to undergo cystoscopy for positive tests. Thus, longitudinal comparative data are needed before these tests can be considered for routine care. Specifically, we need evidence that programmatic surveillance with urine tests significantly decreases the burden of surveillance for patients and has acceptable oncologic outcomes in diverse populations of bladder cancer survivors. Here, we will define the extent to which patients' burden of surveillance can be reduced with bladder cancer urine tests. We propose a three-site randomized phase 2 trial including 240 patients with early-stage bladder cancer. After a normal surveillance cystoscopy at study entry, patients will be randomized 1:1:1 to programmatic surveillance with the xpert bladder cancer urine test, the bladder epicheck urine test, or standard cystoscopy. We will (1) determine whether burden of surveillance is significantly decreased in the urine testing arms versus standard cystoscopy, (2) compare short-term safety outcomes in the urine testing arms versus standard cystoscopy at 1 and 2 years, and (3) estimate important feasibility data for a subsequent large non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial. In summary, we will systematically study whether the burden of surveillance cystoscopy can be improved among bladder cancer survivors by replacing invasive cystoscopy with urine testing, ultimately improving their quality of life. If bladder cancer urine tests significantly decrease the burden of surveillance, our data will provide a strong justification for a subsequent comparative effectiveness trial of programmatic surveillance with urine testing versus standard cystoscopy that is large enough to be powered for oncologic outcomes.
Transactions
| Action | Obligated | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment | $645,926 | |
| Amendment | $332,897 | |
| Amendment | $565,926 | |
| Original award | $583,892 |
Subawards
| Subrecipient | Amount | Awarded |
|---|---|---|
| The Medical University Of South Carolina | $19,474 | |
| Case Western Reserve University | $91,953 | |
| The University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | $148,987 | |
| Vandeventer Place Research Foundation | $40,374 | |
| Bay Pines Foundation, Inc. | $36,978 | |
| Trustees Of Dartmouth College | $46,817 | |
| Tampa VA Research And Education Foundation, Inc. | $35,553 | |
| Case Western Reserve University | $45,977 | |
| The Medical University Of South Carolina | $87,769 | |
| Vandeventer Place Research Foundation | $20,187 | |
| The University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | $148,987 | |
| Bay Pines Foundation, Inc. | $17,950 | |
| The University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | $148,987 | |
| Trustees Of Dartmouth College | $78,061 | |
| The University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | $148,987 |
Show all 15
Quick answers
Who received award R37CA275916?
R37CA275916 was awarded to Veterans Education And Research Association Of Northern New England, Inc. by National Cancer Institute (National Institutes of Health) on August 1, 2023.
How much is award R37CA275916 worth?
$2,128,641 has been obligated on R37CA275916.
On GovTribe
See this award's full record
- Every transaction and subaward
- The recipient's other awards and teaming partners
- Similar grant awards
- Ask GovTribe AI about this award