Office of management and budget circular a-123, appendix a (a-123-a) assessment. Contractor shall prepare rcms for new or within scope processes that have undergone significant change since the last…
Ended Awarded Last action
- Contract number
- NNH13CH36D
- Awardee
-
Kearney & Company, P.C. UEI UC4BPA3LC4J6
- Awarding agency
-
Headquarters
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Obligated
- $861,656
Award facts
- Contract value 100% obligated
- $861,655.80 Current and potential, with all options
- Completion date 100% complete
- Current and potential, with all options
- NAICS code
- 541219 Other Accounting Services
- PSC
- R499 Support- Professional: Other
- Set-aside
- No set-aside
- Competition
- Full and Open Competition · 1 offer Multiple Award, Fair Opportunity
- Pricing
- Firm Fixed Price
- Place of performance
- Alexandria, VA 22314, USA
Award details come from SAM.gov/FPDS.
Transactions
| Action | Obligated | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Supplemental Agreement for work within scope | $0 | |
| Supplemental Agreement for work within scope | $0 | |
| Supplemental Agreement for work within scope | $0 | |
| Supplemental Agreement for work within scope | $238,094 | |
| Supplemental Agreement for work within scope | $189,303 | |
| Supplemental Agreement for work within scope | $297,216 | |
| Original award | $137,043 |
Description
Office of management and budget circular a-123, appendix a (a-123-a) assessment. Contractor shall prepare rcms for new or within scope processes that have undergone significant change since the last assessment. Otherwise review existing within scope rcms. There shall be one RCM for each process included in the assessment. The matrix shall identify by control activity the inherent risk(s), control risk, control objective(s), financial assertions covered, type of control (manual or automated), frequency of control (daily, monthly, etc.), whether the control is key, and information processing control objectives using cavr (completeness, accuracy, validity, and restricted access). Support shall clearly delineate how the contractor arrived at the recommended risk rating for each activity. The contractor shall leverage knowledge gained from previous design assessments, walkthroughs conducted with process owners, review of center process narratives, the NASA office of the chief financial officer (ocfo) comprehensive compliance strategy, continuous monitoring program, review of applicable NASA policy requirements and directives, and other applicable requirements and documentation to assess: (1) the appropriateness and completeness of each key control s design; (2) whether the control adequately address identified risks and support management s financial statement assertions; and (3) whether needed control activities are missing or not properly designed to ensure material misstatements are prevented and/or detected . In those instances where IT is determined there exists a control GAP (i.e., missing control) and/or deficiency (i.e., control not properly designed) the contractor shall make recommendations to NASA management to address these issues.
Quick answers
Who was awarded contract NNH13CH36D?
NNH13CH36D was awarded to Kearney & Company, P.C. by Headquarters (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) on January 17, 2013.
How much is contract NNH13CH36D worth?
The government has obligated $861,656 on NNH13CH36D.
Is contract NNH13CH36D an order under another contract?
Yes. NNH13CH36D is a BPA call under GS23F0092J-NNH10CC12Z, a blanket purchase agreement, on The Professional Services Schedule (PSS).
Was contract NNH13CH36D competed?
The extent of competition for NNH13CH36D was full and open competition. The government received 1 offer.
On GovTribe
See this award's full record
- Every transaction and funding action
- The awardee's other awards and teaming partners
- Similar awards and recompete opportunities
- Ask GovTribe AI about this award