US Mission in Thailand

USAID Thailand, a civilian sub-agency of the U.S. Agency for International Development responsible for development assistance and humanitarian programs in Thailand, has recorded minimal contracting activity and sporadic grant-making over the past five years. The agency operates as USAID's in-country mission and coordinates development funding through both direct contracts and cooperative grants.

USAID Thailand has issued 28 federal contract awards since 2009, with combined potential value of $6.8 million and $6.2 million obligated (92% of potential). Recent contracting volume has been light: 2 awards in 2016, 1 in 2017, 3 in 2019, 1 in 2020, and 4 in 2024, with the most recent award closing in September 2024. All 28 awards across the agency's history carried no set-asides; all contracts were open competition. The contractor base is highly fragmented, with only 10 distinct prime contractors across the entire portfolio and recent award concentration measured at 3 percent of combined potential value among the top contractors. Wow Factor Asia Co., LTD leads by value at $129 thousand (one award), followed by Foreign Awardees (Undisclosed) at $21 thousand, Intellectechs Inc. at $13 thousand, and National Telecom Public Company LIMITED at $11 thousand. No single contractor has won more than one award in recent years, and award sizes remain in the tens-to-low-hundreds of thousands of dollars range.

USAID Thailand's grant-making is sparse: 2 total federal grant awards since 2009 with combined obligated federal dollars of $24.4 million. The agency distributed 1 award in 2017 and 1 in 2021; no grant awards have closed since September 2021. Recipients split evenly between a Cooperative Agreement and a Project Grant, each recipient awarded once, yielding no concentration to speak of. The $24.4 million federal investment across the two grants substantially exceeds the contract portfolio in dollar terms, indicating that grant-based assistance is the dominant funding mechanism for USAID Thailand's development work.

No recent contract opportunities or grant opportunities are recorded against the agency. The minimal transaction volume and five-year gap since the most recent grant award suggest limited current procurement or funding activity suitable for active pursuit.