Technology and Development
Agency facts
- Acronym
-
- T&D
- Organization
-
-
Parent
USFS
-
T&D
- SDTDC
-
T&D
-
Parent
USFS
- Contract obligations
- $10,791,121 In FY2025
Agency codes and contract spending come from SAM.gov/FPDS.
Contract obligations by fiscal year
| Fiscal year | Obligated |
|---|---|
| FY2027 To date | $0 |
| FY2026 | $3,864,400 |
| FY2025 | $10,791,121 |
| FY2024 | $2,978,066 |
| FY2023 | $16,305,337 |
Top contractors by obligations
| Rank | Contractor | Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Redcastle Resources Inc. | $2,533,583 | |
| 2 | Miwok Construction LLC | $458,963 | |
| 3 | Xentity Corporation | $220,315 | |
| 4 | Laurel Electronics, LLC | $123,104 | |
| 5 | Illinois Tool Works Inc. | $114,308 | |
| 6 | Bloomsburie LLC | $100,394 | |
| 7 | Opportunity Resources Inc. | $88,177 | |
| 8 | Rodgers, Steven R | $61,627 | |
| 9 | Humphreys Industrial Products, Inc. | $58,600 | |
| 10 | Magadia Consulting Inc. | $31,009 |
Top contract vehicles by obligations
| Rank | Vehicle | Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | USFS National Geospatial Services | $220,315 | |
| 2 | Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) | $133,303 |
Contracting staff
| Rank | Person | SAM.gov records, last 2 years |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ian Barnes | 38 |
| 2 | Melissa Heckenlaible | 18 |
| 3 | Janeen Damiano | 13 |
| 4 | Bradley Martin | 10 |
| 5 | Arthur Courtney | 9 |
| 6 | Nathan Heikkinen | 8 |
| 7 | Cesia Gil | 8 |
| 8 | Shanita Rankin | 5 |
| 9 | Josh Choi | 4 |
| 10 | Marquez Weldon | 3 |
| 11 | Nicholas Zane | 3 |
| 12 | Tanya Arnberger | 2 |
| 13 | Jordan Carlsen | 2 |
| 14 | Nicholas Bartolomei | 2 |
| 15 | Richard Bogle | 2 |
| 16 | Michael Simpson | 1 |
| 17 | Ma Estrellita Dasmarinas | 1 |
| 18 | Erik Fallo | 1 |
| 19 | Curtis R. Landreth | 1 |
| 20 | John Curry | 1 |
About this agency
The Department of Agriculture Forest Service Technology and Development is the civilian agency within the USDA that procures and manages forest management technologies, equipment, and engineering services supporting the national forest system. The agency awards contracts to develop, test, and deploy innovations across timber management, fire suppression, resource monitoring, and forest health applications.
The Forest Service Technology and Development program has awarded 2,029 contracts since 2007, with a combined potential value of $182.6 million and $172.4 million obligated to date. Award volume has accelerated modestly in recent years: 21 awards in 2022, 46 in 2023, 54 in 2024, 31 in 2025, and 14 year-to-date in 2026. The most recent award is recorded for November 1, 2026.
The contract portfolio is moderately concentrated by award count. Redcastle Resources Inc. dominates recent activity, capturing 53 awards worth $26.1 million combined potential value over the last five years. Xentity Corporation holds 15 awards valued at $7.5 million. These two primes and three smaller vendors (Opportunity Resources Inc., Illinois Tool Works Inc., and S&K Engineering And Research, LLC) account for 48 percent of recent awards by count. By potential value, Redcastle and Xentity represent only 19 percent of combined value, indicating a more fragmented landscape when measured by dollar concentration; the long tail of 427 distinct prime contractors disperses value across the portfolio. The agency shows no recent awards to a single vendor exceeding approximately $26 million.
Small business set-asides comprise approximately one-third of awards. The agency issued 662 small-business awards (33 percent of the total), with 185 designated 8(a) sole source (9 percent). The remaining 58 percent of awards carry no set-aside restriction. Service-disabled veteran-owned small business, woman-owned small business, and economically disadvantaged woman-owned small business designations each account for fewer than five awards in the portfolio.
No recent contract opportunities are reported in the current digest against this agency. Business development professionals evaluating the Forest Service Technology and Development program should monitor the agency's solicitation channels for forestry equipment and forest-science contracting activity, given the moderate competitive concentration and consistent small-business participation.
Quick answers
What is Technology and Development?
Technology and Development (T&D) is part of Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.
What offices are part of Technology and Development?
Technology and Development has 3 sub-agencies and offices with their own GovTribe pages, Geospatial Service and Technology Center, Missoula Technology and Development Center and San Dimas Technology and Development Center.
How much does Technology and Development spend on contracts?
Contracts funded by Technology and Development and its offices obligated $10,791,121 in fiscal year 2025 and $33,938,923 in fiscal years 2023 through 2027.
Who are Technology and Development's largest contractors?
The contractors Technology and Development and its offices obligated the most to in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are Redcastle Resources Inc. ($2,533,583), Miwok Construction LLC ($458,963) and Xentity Corporation ($220,315).
Which contract vehicles does Technology and Development use most?
The contract vehicles Technology and Development and its offices obligated the most through in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are USFS National Geospatial Services ($220,315) and Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) ($133,303). Orders through any contract vehicle obligated $353,618 in those years, 9% of its contract obligations.
On GovTribe
See the full record
- Federal contract awards it made
- Federal contract awards it funded
- IDV awards it made
- IDV awards it funded
- Contract vehicles it funds
- Funding analysis by contractor, NAICS and set-aside
- Contacts at this agency
- Ask GovTribe AI about this agency