FAR 48.104-4 Sharing alternative-no-cost settlement method
Subsection Federal Acquisition Regulation
Facts
- Citation
- FAR 48.104-4
- Type
- Subsection
- Text as of
- FAC 2026-01
- Official text
- acquisition.gov
Text from acquisition.gov. Federal Register history from the Federal Register's records of the rules that amended this subsection.
Text
In selecting an appropriate mechanism for incorporating a VECP into a contract, the contracting officer shall analyze the different approaches available to determine which one would be in the Government’s best interest. Contracting officers should balance the administrative costs of negotiating a settlement against the anticipated savings. A no-cost settlement may be used if, in the contracting officer’s judgment, reliance on other VECP approaches likely would not be more cost-effective, and the no-cost settlement would provide adequate consideration to the Government. Under this method of settlement, the contractor would keep all of the savings on the instant contract, and all savings on its concurrent contracts only. The Government would keep all savings resulting from concurrent contracts placed with other sources, savings from all future contracts, and all collateral savings. Use of this method must be by mutual agreement of both parties for individual VECPs.
Quick answers
What is FAR 48.104-4?
FAR 48.104-4 is a subsection of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, titled "Sharing alternative-no-cost settlement method".
Are changes to FAR 48.104-4 proposed?
No proposed rule from the last 3 years is waiting on a final rule.
On GovTribe
Follow the rules behind federal contracts
- Search Federal Register rules and proposed rules for the FAR, DFARS and agency supplements
- Solicitations, awards and government files in one search
- Ask GovTribe AI about the rules that apply to a contract