Superfund State, Political Subdivision, and Indian Tribe Site-Specific Cooperative Agreements
Active
- Assistance listing
- 66.802
- Grant awards
- 3,028 $2,146,833,205 in federal obligations
Program facts
- Assistance types
-
- Project Grant
- Cooperative Agreement
- Formula Grant
- Treasury accounts
-
- 68-8145-0-1-304
- 68-0107-0-1-304
- More information
Program details come from SAM.gov Assistance Listings. Updated . Grant award figures come from USAspending.gov.
About this program
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is funding site-specific Superfund cooperative agreements and project grants under CFDA 66.802 to support states, tribes, and political subdivisions in conducting site characterization, remedial investigation, feasibility studies, and remedial action at hazardous waste sites listed on or potentially eligible for the National Priorities List (NPL), with the most recent award dated May 1, 2026.
The program has awarded 3,028 grants totaling $2.15 billion in federal obligations since 1982, with activity steady over recent years: 74 awards in 2022, 98 in 2023, 66 in 2024, 67 in 2025, and 24 year-to-date in 2026. Awards are non-competitive; EPA regional Superfund offices conduct administrative and technical evaluations, negotiate final work plans, and award funding on a case-by-case basis. These are predominantly Project Grants (94% of awards) with a smaller share of Cooperative Agreements (6%), structured to provide full or partial federal funding for state and tribal environmental programs.
The EPA dominates funding at 2,371 awards worth $1.25 billion, while EPA Regional offices account for most remaining activity: Region 6 leads with 78 awards and $227.2 million, Region 8 with 72 awards and $156.2 million, Region 5 with 126 awards and $123.6 million, and Region 1 with 49 awards and $97.9 million. Award magnitudes vary widely: site assessment grants range from $25 thousand to $270 thousand, while remedial action grants span from $40 thousand to $2.83 million. A single standout award to New Hampshire for the Plating Company site reached $15.1 million; another to UC Davis for Clear Lake hypolimnetic oxygenation reached $1.25 million.
Recent awards illustrate typical scope: Michigan Department of Environment and Great Lakes received $445.9 thousand for site assessment activities; Ohio EPA received $532.5 thousand for characterization of 14 sites; Indiana Department of Environmental Management received $455.2 thousand for site characterization including preliminary assessments and inspections; New Mexico received funding for vapor intrusion studies and remedial action at Double Eagle and Fourth Street sites; and states including North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Kentucky received grants ranging from $31 thousand to $849.7 thousand for review of RI/FS documents, proposed plans, records of decision, and five-year reviews at NPL sites.
No recent grant opportunities appear open in the source; the program operates on an application intake basis. Preapplication coordination is required. Subject to Executive Order 12372, applicants in states with single points of contact must consult designated state officials; applicants not subject to state review must provide affected entities 60 days' notice post-selection for funding.
Objective and description
- Objective
The goals of this assistance listing are to (1) conduct site characterization activities at potential or confirmed hazardous waste sites; (2) undertake response planning and implementation actions at sites on the National Priorities List (NPL) to cle
- Description
Site-specific Superfund support for states, tribes and political subdivisions.
Eligibility
- Applicant eligibility
States (and political subdivisions thereof), Commonwealths, U.S. Territories and Possessions, and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments, including intertribal consortia and political subdivisions.
- Uses of assistance
Site-specific work within EPA's Superfund Remedial Program. More specifically, funding may be used to: (1) conduct non time critical removal actions; (2) perform site characterization activities such as preliminary assessments, site inspections, remedial investigations, feasibility studies, and remedial design activities at potential or confirmed hazardous waste sites; (3) conduct remedial actions (i.e., clean up) at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites listed on the National Priorities List (40 CFR 300); (4) support CERCLA implementation activities; (5) identify Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs); (6) conduct settlement negotiations; (7) take enforcement actions against PRPs; and, (8) oversee PRP cleanups. Assistance agreement awards under this program may involve or relate to geospatial information. Further information regarding geospatial information may be obtained by viewing the following website: Geospatial Resources at EPA (https://www.epa.gov/geospatial).Funds may not be used to support Core (non-site specific) activities.
- Use restrictions
Funding may not be used to conduct tasks or activities not authorized by CERCLA. Funds may not be used for non-site-specific Core Program activities (see assistance listing 66.809).
- Length and time phasing of assistance
Funds awarded for duration of project, subject to time constraints specified by EPA.
How to apply
- Preapplication coordination
Preapplication coordination is required. Environmental impact information is not required for this program. This program is eligible for coverage under E.O. 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." An applicant should consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review. EPA financial assistance programs and activities subject to intergovernmental review that are subject to review under State single point of contact procedures are identified at https://www.epa.gov/grants/epa-financial-assistance-programs-subject-executive-order-12372-and-section. Applicants for programs or activities subject to Intergovernmental Review that are not subject to State single point of contact review must provide directly affected State, areawide, regional, and local entities at least 60 days to review their application following notification by EPA that the application has been selected for funding as provided by 40 CFR 29.8(a) and (c). Consultation and preapplication conference(s) are recommended.
- Application procedure
Issuing office will provide location of application procedure details as appropriate.
- Criteria for selecting proposals
For fund-lead remedial action, the site must appear on the National Priorities List of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan (NCP) (40 CFR 300). Removal actions require a planning period of six months or more. Each project is examined and selected on a case-by-case basis based upon site ranking, availability of cost share from the State (remedial action), availability of funds, receipt of application and other criteria as determined by EPA.
- Award procedure
These are non-competitive awards. EPA regional Superfund program offices will conduct an administrative evaluation to determine the adequacy of the application in relation to grant regulations and technical and program evaluation to determine the merit and relevance of the project. The Agency will then advise the applicant if funding is being considered. A final work plan will then be negotiated with the applicant. Final approval of application and supporting documentation and offer of award is made by the EPA Regional Administrator unless redelegated to the Regional Division Director.
- Time to approval or disapproval
Approximately ninety (90) days.
- Renewals
Extensions are available but not guaranteed. Applications must be submitted for additional funding.
- Appeals
Disputes relating to matters other than the competitive selection of recipients will be resolved under 2 CFR 1500 Subpart E, as applicable.
Grant awards
Latest 10 of 3,028 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Top recipients by federal obligations
| Rank | Recipient | Federal obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Of Idaho Department Of Environmental Quality | $200,894,200 | 9% |
| 2 | Colorado Department Of Public Health & Environment | $159,364,298 | 7% |
| 3 | Department Of Environmental Quality | $150,923,113 | 7% |
| 4 | Quapaw Nation | $114,001,013 | 5% |
| 5 | Illinois Environmental Protection Agency | $74,740,418 | 3% |
| 6 | New Mexico Environment Department | $66,841,375 | 3% |
| 7 | Montana Department Of Environmental Quality | $63,704,771 | 3% |
| 8 | New Hampshire Department Of Environmental Services | $59,121,171 | 3% |
| 9 | City Of Omaha | $50,152,162 | 2% |
| 10 | Michigan Department Of Environment, Great Lakes, And Energy | $41,008,266 | 2% |
10 of 187 recipients listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Federal obligations by fiscal year
| Fiscal year | Federal obligations |
|---|---|
| FY2026 | $30,950,371 |
| FY2025 | $78,071,336 |
| FY2024 | $103,372,812 |
| FY2023 | $108,869,654 |
| FY2022 | $132,631,048 |
| FY2021 | $79,222,328 |
| FY2020 | $78,984,362 |
| FY2019 | $74,216,298 |
| FY2018 | $64,013,529 |
| FY2017 | $97,628,252 |
| FY2016 | $81,923,127 |
| FY2015 | $89,916,666 |
| FY2014 | $96,206,189 |
| FY2013 | $89,734,778 |
| FY2012 | $81,838,148 |
| FY2011 | $85,051,592 |
| FY2010 | $91,533,632 |
| FY2009 | $164,936,938 |
| FY2008 | $108,542,572 |
| FY2007 | $65,139,624 |
| FY2006 | $73,617,110 |
| FY2005 | $51,907,530 |
| FY2004 | $53,618,862 |
| FY2003 | $51,616,027 |
| FY2002 | $69,887,990 |
| FY2001 | $46,383,667 |
Show all 26
Quick answers
What is Assistance Listing 66.802?
Assistance Listing 66.802 is Superfund State, Political Subdivision, and Indian Tribe Site-Specific Cooperative Agreements, a federal grant program run by Environmental Protection Agency.
What is the CFDA number for Superfund State, Political Subdivision, and Indian Tribe Site-Specific Cooperative Agreements?
Its CFDA number is 66.802: Assistance Listing numbers were called CFDA numbers before 2018.
How much funding has Assistance Listing 66.802 awarded?
3,028 grant awards under 66.802 have obligated $2,146,833,205 in federal funds to 187 recipients.
Who receives the most funding from 66.802?
The recipients obligated the most under Superfund State, Political Subdivision, and Indian Tribe Site-Specific Cooperative Agreements are State Of Idaho Department Of Environmental Quality ($200,894,200), Colorado Department Of Public Health & Environment ($159,364,298) and Department Of Environmental Quality ($150,923,113).
How much did 66.802 obligate in fiscal year 2025?
Grants under 66.802 obligated $78,071,336 in federal funds in fiscal year 2025.
On GovTribe
See this program's full record
- Every grant award and opportunity under it
- Funding by recipient, agency and assistance type
- Alerts for new opportunities
- Ask GovTribe AI about this program