Performance Partnership Grants
Active
- Assistance listing
- 66.605
- Grant awards
- 3,657 $10,580,258,301 in federal obligations
Program facts
- Also known as
- PPGs
- Assistance types
-
- Cooperative Agreement
- Project Grant
- Formula Grant
- Treasury account
-
- 68-0103-0-1-304
- More information
Program details come from SAM.gov Assistance Listings. Updated . Grant award figures come from USAspending.gov.
About this program
The Environmental Protection Agency funds Performance Partnership Grants (CFDA 66.605) enabling states and tribes to combine funds from up to 18 eligible categorical environmental grant programs into a single consolidated application, budget, and workplan, with the most recent award issued on October 1, 2026.
The program funds state and tribal continuing environmental programs spanning water quality monitoring and pollution control, air quality assessment and monitoring, lead-based paint hazard reduction and compliance, pesticide regulatory enforcement and applicator certification, brownfields site assessment and remediation, nonpoint source pollution prevention and management, solid waste and hazardous waste management, and tribal environmental capacity building. Recipients combine resources to address their highest environmental priorities with administrative flexibility; applicants submit joint applications and workplans to their EPA regional office rather than separate submissions for each categorical program.
The portfolio comprises 3,657 awards since 1996, with combined federal obligation of $10.58 billion and combined total obligation (including non-federal match) of $15.88 billion. Awards are predominantly Project Grants (52 percent, 1,901 awards) and Cooperative Agreements (37 percent, 1,363 awards), with a smaller share of Formula Grants (11 percent, 393 awards). Recent activity shows roughly 100–130 awards per year; 2026 year-to-date shows 10 awards as of early October. The Environmental Protection Agency dominates funding, accounting for 2,775 awards and $7.14 billion in federal dollars obligated (76 percent of award count). EPA regional offices—particularly Region 5, Region 4, Region 9, and Region 10—constitute a secondary tier of funders by both award count and federal dollars.
Recent awards reflect the program's scope: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy received $13.7 million for NPDES and stormwater permitting and water quality restoration; Illinois EPA received $63.3 million for multi-media air, water, land, and hazardous waste programs; Florida Department of Agriculture received $32.4 million for pesticide inspections, enforcement, and applicator training; and tribal awards range from $90 thousand (Mechoopda Tribe for water quality monitoring) to $1.07 billion (Navajo Nation for water quality and standards certification). No recent opportunities are identified in the source.
Objective and description
- Objective
Fostering EPA's partnership with states and Tribes is critical to accelerating environmental outcomes. Performance Partnership Grants (PPGs) are the cornerstone of the National Environmental Performance Partnership System (NEPPS), which aims to stren
- Description
States and Tribes can combine funds from two or more eligible grant programs into a PPG. A key benefit of the PPG is that it requires only one application and one budget, regardless of the number of eligible programs included in the PPG. Applicants are not required to submit separate budgets for each individual program when funds are included in a PPG. Additionally, a PPG is managed through one consolidated work plan for all programs that are included in the PPG. There are currently 18 grant programs that have been determined as eligible for inclusion in a PPG. For a list of eligible programs, which include competitive and/or non-competitive grants, please visit www.epa.gov/the NEPPS. website at https://www.epa.gov/NEPPS The agency supports the goals of Performance Partnership Grants (PPGs) which serve to: (1) strengthen partnerships between EPA and recipients through joint planning, priority setting, and efficient and effective management of resources; (2) provide states, Tribes, and interstate agencies with flexibility to direct resources where they are needed to address environmental and public health priorities; (3) link program activities more effectively with environmental and public health goals and environmental outcomes; (4) foster implementation of innovative approaches such as pollution prevention, ecosystem management, and community-based environmental protection strategies; and (5) provide savings by streamlining administrative requirements.
Eligibility
- Applicant eligibility
States agencies (including environmental, health, agriculture, and other agencies where authorized by state or Tribal law), interstate agencies, U.S. territories, the District of Columbia, federally recognized Indian Tribes (including Alaska Native villages), and intertribal consortia are eligible to receive more than one of the 18 categorical grant programs are eligible to apply for PPGs. Any duly authorized state or Tribal entity that currently receives or is eligible to receive EPA categorical program grants may request a PPG for the funds it administers.
- Beneficiary eligibility
States, U.S. territories, federally recognized Indian tribal governments, and interstate agencies.
- Uses of assistance
Environment (water, air, solid waste, pesticides, radiation)
- Use restrictions
While this program offers flexibility in how funds can be used, there are specific restrictions and guidelines that recipients must adhere to, such as: 1. Allowable Activities: Funds must be used for activities that align with the objectives of the PPG as stated on the grant workplan. Certain activities may be prohibited or restricted based on statutory or regulatory requirements. 2. Cost Share Requirements: Certain PPG-eligible grants require recipients to provide a matching contribution to support the funded activities.
- Length and time phasing of assistance
The period of performance for a PPG is flexible and can be negotiated between EPA and the recipient for up to five years. To maximize flexibilities and ensure program continuity, it is a best practice to apply for multi-year PPGs. Recipients are encouraged to align their multi-year PPG work plans with EPA's 2-year National Program Guidances (NPGs) to streamline the work plan negotiation process and reduce administrative burden. Grantees are reimbursed for actual expenses based on submissions in financial status reports.
How to apply
- Preapplication coordination
EPA financial assistance programs and activities subject to intergovernmental review that are subject to review under State single point of contact procedures are identified at https://www.epa.gov/grants/epa-financial-assistance-programs-subject-executive-order-12372- and-section-204. Applicants for programs or activities subject to Intergovernmental Review that are not subject to State single point of contact review must provide directly affected State, areawide, regional, and local entities at least 60 days to review their application following notification by EPA that the application has been selected for funding as provided by 40 CFR 29.8(a) and (c). Applicants interested in pursuing PPGs should coordinate with their appropriate EPA regional office to develop a PPG through joint negotiations.
- Criteria for selecting proposals
Applicants must meet selection criteria for each categorical grant to be combined in the PPG.
- Award procedure
Grant applications are reviewed by the appropriate EPA regional office, and if approved, awarded by the Regional Administrator. If an applicant is selected for a competitive award, the applicant will work with the EPA regional office to add competitive grant funds to the PPG if requested by the recipient. The workplan activities and supporting documentation that were the basis of the competitive award also will be added to the PPG.
- Time to approval or disapproval
From 60 to 90 days for approval, approximately 60 days for disapproval.
- Renewals
Generally, EPA may choose to either fully award or incrementally fund an awarded grant or cooperative agreement. Approval of subsequent funding increments and extensions is dependent on satisfactory project progress, continued relevance of the project to EPA's priorities, availability of funds, and Agency policy on the competitive grant process.
- Appeals
Disputes relating to matters other than the competitive selection of recipients will be resolved under 2 CFR 1500 Subpart E, as applicable.
Grant awards
Latest 10 of 3,657 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Top recipients by federal obligations
| Rank | Recipient | Federal obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas Commission On Environmental Quality | $584,795,811 | 6% |
| 2 | New Jersey Department Of Environmental Protection | $367,859,710 | 3% |
| 3 | Illinois Environmental Protection Agency | $292,515,058 | 3% |
| 4 | Massachusetts Department Of Environmental Protection | $274,340,284 | 3% |
| 5 | Department Of Environmental Conservation New York | $255,171,530 | 2% |
| 6 | Missouri Department Of Natural R | $248,989,143 | 2% |
| 7 | Al Department Environmental Management | $234,030,085 | 2% |
| 8 | Wisconsin Department Of Natural Resources | $231,158,583 | 2% |
| 9 | Michigan Department Of Environment, Great Lakes, And Energy | $230,052,365 | 2% |
| 10 | Department Of Natural Resources | $229,863,911 | 2% |
10 of 396 recipients listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Federal obligations by fiscal year
| Fiscal year | Federal obligations |
|---|---|
| FY2026 | $221,244,136 |
| FY2025 | $462,552,345 |
| FY2024 | $498,859,660 |
| FY2023 | $525,582,789 |
| FY2022 | $478,220,025 |
| FY2021 | $496,325,460 |
| FY2020 | $481,009,957 |
| FY2019 | $451,401,183 |
| FY2018 | $440,658,758 |
| FY2017 | $421,664,018 |
| FY2016 | $450,326,121 |
| FY2015 | $449,623,255 |
| FY2014 | $447,191,095 |
| FY2013 | $434,239,541 |
| FY2012 | $441,462,766 |
| FY2011 | $438,540,529 |
| FY2010 | $398,859,030 |
| FY2009 | $387,732,616 |
| FY2008 | $399,140,742 |
| FY2007 | $390,237,659 |
| FY2006 | $371,673,083 |
| FY2005 | $353,944,961 |
| FY2004 | $320,512,398 |
| FY2003 | $280,612,728 |
| FY2002 | $268,975,686 |
| FY2001 | $260,053,482 |
Show all 26
Quick answers
What is Assistance Listing 66.605?
Assistance Listing 66.605 is Performance Partnership Grants, a federal grant program run by Environmental Protection Agency.
What is the CFDA number for Performance Partnership Grants?
Its CFDA number is 66.605: Assistance Listing numbers were called CFDA numbers before 2018.
How much funding has Assistance Listing 66.605 awarded?
3,657 grant awards under 66.605 have obligated $10,580,258,301 in federal funds to 396 recipients.
Who receives the most funding from 66.605?
The recipients obligated the most under Performance Partnership Grants are Texas Commission On Environmental Quality ($584,795,811), New Jersey Department Of Environmental Protection ($367,859,710) and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ($292,515,058).
How much did 66.605 obligate in fiscal year 2025?
Grants under 66.605 obligated $462,552,345 in federal funds in fiscal year 2025.
On GovTribe
See this program's full record
- Every grant award and opportunity under it
- Funding by recipient, agency and assistance type
- Alerts for new opportunities
- Ask GovTribe AI about this program