Revenue Maximization and Cost Avoidance Services - DSS, DMH, and DHSS

The State of Missouri has issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) numbered RFPS30034901802639 for Revenue Maximization and Cost Avoidance Services to be provided across three state agencies: the Department of Social Services (DSS), Department of Mental Health (DMH), and Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS). The solicitation seeks a vendor to deliver comprehensive services aimed at maximizing revenue and reducing costs for these state departments. Proposals were accepted from June 29, 2018, to July 26, 2018, at 3:00 PM CDT, with a contract period spanning three years from the effective contract date. Vendors were required to submit their responses either electronically through the MissouriBUYS system or as hard copy submissions to the Division of Purchasing. The procurement covers jurisdictions including Clay County and Jefferson City, with the primary point of contact being Jacqueline Satterlee from the Division of Purchasing located at 301 West High Street in Jefferson City, Missouri. Vendors were expected to thoroughly review the solicitation documents, which included all applicable requirements, detailed specifications, and terms and conditions.

No specific set-aside designations or restrictions on vendor participation were explicitly mentioned in the solicitation documents. The RFP was open to all vendors without preference for disadvantaged enterprises or specific business types. No information was provided about incumbent vendors or existing contractors for these services. The solicitation did not specify an estimated total contract value or budget range, which is typical of many government procurement documents. Payment terms were established as Net 45 Days with Free On Board Destination delivery terms. Vendors were required to access the complete solicitation through the MissouriBUYS system's Overview tab, where they could either print the document for hard copy submission or review and accept the documents for electronic submission. The lack of detailed financial information suggests that pricing and contract value would be determined through the competitive proposal process.