Earned Value Management System - GTRI

The Georgia Institute of Technology, specifically the Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI), has issued a Request for Information (RFI) for an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) procurement targeting software solutions and consultancy support. The project is structured across three distinct phases: Phase I involves a comprehensive gap analysis of current systems and processes to ensure compliance with EIA-748 standards, estimated to take approximately three months; Phase II will focus on implementing recommended solutions; and Phase III will involve verification and preparation for Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) certification. The procurement targets suppliers capable of providing advanced supply chain management solutions with a specific focus on EVMS implementation. The RFI is scheduled with a posting date of December 13, 2024, and responses are due by January 10, 2025, with potential consideration for late submissions until a formal solicitation is issued. GTRI currently operates without a formal EVMS system and utilizes a tailored approach for contracts under $100 million, serving diverse sectors including Department of Defense, State of Georgia, and commercial clients.

The procurement appears open to a wide range of vendors, though specific set-aside designations are not explicitly detailed in the provided documentation. GTRI, as a non-profit University Applied Research Center, receives approximately 84% of its $305 million annual research funding from DOD agencies, suggesting a preference for vendors with strong defense and research sector experience. Security considerations may limit vendor access to Georgia Tech systems, and all submitted information will be subject to the Georgia Open Records Act. While no specific budget range is provided, the scale of GTRI's research funding indicates a potentially substantial contract value. The RFI includes provisions for an Industry Day to be announced, which will provide additional opportunities for potential vendors to engage with the procurement team. The scoring of responses will assist in the Analysis of Alternatives, though the scoring is not intended to be prejudicial to subsequent solicitations.