Research Report on Chinas Efforts to Combat Terrorism

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
March 12, 2015

PERIOD OF PROPOSAL SUBMISSION ENDS:
April 2, 2015

ABOUT PROPOSALS. The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission (hereafter "the Commission") invites submission of proposals to provide a one-time unclassified report on China's efforts to combat terrorism.

ABOUT THE COMMISSION. The Commission was established by Congress in 2000 to monitor and report to Congress on the economic and national security dimensions of the United States' trade and economic ties with the People's Republic of China. Further details about the Commission are available on its website at: www.uscc.gov.

The Commission solicits this research pursuant to its Congressional mandate (contained in P.L. 113-291, Section 1259B), which states that "The Commission ... shall investigate and report ... on ...

‘‘(H) The drivers, nature, and implications of the growing economic, technological, political, cultural, people-to-people, and security relations of the People's Republic of China's with other countries, regions, and international and regional entities (including multilateral organizations) ...."

"(I) The compliance of the People's Republic of China with ... any other commitments and agreements strategic to the United States ... and United States enforcement policies with respect to such agreements."

The report's key research requirements are:

1. Describe the Chinese government's approach to terrorism (both domestic and foreign) and its counterterrorism strategy and policies. How does the Chinese government define terrorism? What, in the perception of the Chinese government, are the most significant terror threats facing China? In this discussion, provide a history of China's relationship with terrorism and explain how China's counterterrorism strategy and policies have evolved over time.

2. How does the Chinese government's relationship with its Islamic populations in Xinjiang inform China's perceptions of, assumptions about, and responses to Islamic extremism and terrorism? To what extent is China's approach to global terrorism grounded in these perceptions and assumptions? How do these perceptions and assumptions inform China's engagement with countries with Muslim majorities or governments (particularly Pakistan, Afghanistan, Malaysia, and Indonesia), and how do these countries view China's domestic policies toward Xinjiang?

3. How does the threat of terrorism factor into the Chinese government's overall perception of China's national security? How have China's threat perceptions regarding terrorism impacted the priorities, missions, and modernization of the PLA and China's internal security forces? How will China's evolving threat perceptions likely impact future priorities, missions, and modernization of the PLA and China's internal security forces?

4. Describe China's counterterrorism bureaucracy. Assess the official (and, if applicable, semi-official or unofficial) Chinese actors and organizations involved in China's counterterrorism bureaucracy. In particular, discuss the relationship between civilian and military entities involved in counterterrorism policymaking, intelligence gathering, and activities/operations. Include an organizational chart mapping this bureaucracy and the relationships it contains.

5. Discuss the relationships between the China's counterterrorism bureaucracy and its international counterparts. How has China cooperated with other countries to address domestic and international terrorism? How does China's perception of terrorist threats shape its relationships with other countries (in particular, in the Middle East, South Asia, and Central Asia)?

6. Assess the role of terrorism and counterterrorism in the U.S.-China relationship. Describe the history of U.S.-China cooperation on terrorism; China's approach to and involvement in the U.S.-led War on Terror; how, if at all, bilateral cooperation on counterterrorism impacts other areas of the U.S.-China relationship. Conduct a SWOT analysis of U.S.-China counterterrorism cooperation.

The report should include an executive summary of the report's key findings; a brief overview of the sources and analytic methodology used for the report; and a brief explanation of the scope and limitations of the report.

Additional Requirements:

1. Prior to the award of any contract, the contractor must be registered in the federal System for Award Management (SAM).

2. Once the Commission selects a contractor for this project, and a contract is signed, public notice of this will be made on the Commission's website.

3. The Commission's goal is to have a report prepared for review in a timely fashion. In ordinary circumstances, once the Commission selects a contractor and a contract is signed, a draft report must be submitted to the Commission for review no later than 120 days from the date the contract is signed. The Commission will then endeavor to provide comments and requests for adjustments within 30 days; subsequently, the final report must be submitted within 30 days of formal receipt of the Commission's comments. The Commission recognizes, under certain circumstances, a contractor may wish to have more time to prepare the first draft of the report under the contract. The contractor, in their contract proposal, should stipulate the time frame for submission of the draft report. It is to be understood; however, that time is of the essence in completing research contracts for the Commission.

4. As work on the report progresses, the Commission's Research Director shall act as the Commission's representative in monitoring the progress, quality, and responsiveness of the report to the major issues of concern identified in this Request for Proposals (RFP). The Research Director shall, on request to the contractor, be entitled to informal briefings on the status of the research work and to readings of the draft in progress.

5. The report shall be free of typographical errors and conform to the Chicago Manual of Style. Upon receipt of all drafts, the Commission will inspect the document for typographical errors and deviations from the Chicago Manual of Style guidelines. At the discretion of the Commission, if a draft contains excessive deficiencies, the Commission will return the draft to the contractor and request the contractor cure the draft of deficiencies within five (5) working days (not counting weekends and Federal holidays). Upon resubmission of the draft by the contractor to the Commission, should deficiencies remain, the Commission, at its discretion, will submit the draft to its copyeditor for correction, the cost of which ($43.98 per hour) will be deducted from the final cost of the contract. The contract shall be subject to termination if the Commission deems that the work is of unsatisfactory quality.

6. At the Commission's discretion, the report procured via this RFP may be posted on the Commission's website.

7. Each organization or individual responding to this request must warrant they will perform this work solely for the Commission, and the resulting report will not be shared with other parties without the prior written consent of the Commission.

8. The Commission expects contractors to identify all personnel working on the contract, and that there will not be any delegation of responsibilities to other parties without prior written approval of the Commission.

9. After completion of the report, the Commission staff, in consultation with the contractor, will prepare a short summary of the research for posting on the Commission's website and other media. The Commission staff shall consult with the contractor in preparing said document.

10. At the discretion and request of the Commission, the contractor shall agree to participate in up to four (4) separate briefings, and up to one (1) public hearing, held by the Commission, of up to two (2) hours each in the Washington, D.C. area, supported by at least one (1) individual affiliated with the contractor identified as "key personnel." This could include, but not necessarily be limited to, briefing the content of the research to Commissioners and Commission staff, appearing as witnesses at a public hearing held by the Commission, and briefing the content of the research to Members of Congress and/or their staff. No additional remuneration will be provided to the contractor for these briefings or a hearing. The Commission will make a good faith effort to schedule briefings and a hearing at times that are subject to mutual agreement.

Primary Selection Criteria:

1. The Commission will determine which organization or individual responding to this request will be awarded the contract based on a comprehensive "best value" analysis of the proposals received, to include costs, technical value, and ability to complete the work satisfactorily and on time, and past performance with the Commission, if applicable.

2. The primary weighting criterion in selection shall be the assessed qualifications and ability of an organization or individual to address the fundamental research points enunciated above ("key research requirements").

3. The cost and amount of time necessary to complete the report will also be considered as criteria in the selection process.

Proposal submissions should include:

1. A statement of the applicant's relevant qualifications to satisfy the terms of this RFP, to include curricula vitae for personnel intended for work on the project.

2. Identification of the principal researchers who will be responsible for the preparation of the report. It is understood that the designation of the researchers is a critical element of the proposal, and any changes regarding which individuals will be involved in the report's preparation must be approved by the Commission in advance and in writing.

3. A description of the research methodology the applicant proposes to employ. In describing methodology, the submission should provide detailed descriptions of the sources and methods that will be used to research the report's topic and the extent to which Chinese language sources, if any, and other primary materials will be used.

4. A list of any entities for whom you have conducted research or provided consulting services in the past. The Commission understands the applicant may be limited in providing such information by confidentiality agreements.

5. An estimate of the time the applicant will need to complete the required work.

6. The price the applicant will charge to the Commission to complete the work set forth in this RFP.

Organizations and individuals wishing to submit a proposal in response to this RFP must ensure that the response arrives at the location noted below by 5:30PM (EST) on April 2, 2015, or it will not be accepted or considered.

Electronic submissions are acceptable.

Proposals, as well as inquiries or any other correspondence related to this matter, should be directed to:

Katherine Koleski
Research Director
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission
Hall of the States, Suite 602
444 North Capitol Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
phone: 202-624-1482
e-mail: kkoleski@uscc.gov