Questions and Answers

Awarded Award Notice Posted

Solicitation number
W911QY10R0067
Agency
ACC Aberdeen Proving Ground Army Contracting Command, Department of Defense
Awarded
to Advanced Technology Systems Company, Inc. (OF Virginia)
Set-aside
No set-aside

Opportunity facts

Contract number
W911QY11D0026-0007 Federal contract award
NAICS code
423610 Electrical Apparatus and Equipment, Wiring Supplies, and Related Equipment Merchant Wholesalers
PSC
Not on record
Place of performance
Rdecom Contracting Center - Natick R&D (Rdecom-CC) Attn: Amsrd-ACC-N, Natick Contracting Division (R and BaseOPS), Building 1, Kansas Street Natick MA 01760 US

Notice details come from SAM.gov. Updated .

Notice text

3 versions

Update #3 · Latest ·

Added: Jun 17, 2010 5:18 pm Modified: Aug 09, 2010 3:14 pmTrack Changes Question #1:
The pre-solicitation synopsis and draft PWS all point to using the NAICS code 423610 (Security Systems Merchant Wholesalers), except on page 44 in section H.19 Small Business Set-Aside Awardees, where the same NAICS code (423610) is described as Fire Fighting, Rescue and Safety Equipment, which is confusing since the 2007 NAICS Definition for 423610 is Electrical Apparatus and Equipment, Wiring Supplies, and Related Equipment Merchant Wholesalers. The PWS calls for system integration, deployment of personnel to OCONUS locations, and numerous other requirements that are not typical of electrical equipment wholesalers.
Response:
See U.S Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definition at http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/. The 2007 NAICS Code 423610 has a Corresponding Index Entry as Security Systems Merchant Wholesalers. Please review the entire list under this specific code number. Any contractor may be required to deploy personnel to OCONUS locations if the installation of their products warrant.

Question #2:
Is there an existing estimate of the following - percent of funding spent on each equipment, services, in CONUS and OCONUS? Is there a list of projects that are currently in the budget process? If so, can that be made available?
Response:
Sorry No, the solicitation is for an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract. Currently there is no definitive list of projects.

Question #3:
The salient characteristics in Appendix A (pg 111) seem to point to specific product types that would otherwise be obtained on a GSA Schedule. Is the intent of this program, then, to provide the integration and COP views, and not to procure these devices as well?
Response:
The Governments intent is to procure the types of items required by PM-Force Protection Systems using this IDIQ contract, that are not under another contract.
No, the hardware and ancillary services such as installation, training and maintenance support is all that is required. Intent is to utilize Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) equipment.

Question #4:
One of the requirements is to support maintenance and training (both NET and sustainment type training) for a period of one year beyond initial deployment. What are the resources available to continue sustainment (e.g., refresher training, supply and logistics, spare parts/maintenance) so that a strategy can be developed to stage those aspects for the greatest degree of success into the O&M phase?
Response:
Current planning is that follow-on sustainment will be provided through Product Manager Consequence Management as a separate contract.

Question #5:
Under the section of the synopsis entitled Partial Small Business Set-Aside Lot, it is stated that, The Milestones for this acquisition are shown in Section 20, Acquisition Milestone Schedule. However, that section does not appear in the documentation provided. Can you please share that section? Particularly, the RFP release date.
Response:
Milestone Start Date
Sources Sought Notice 06/16/10
Draft RFP 07/15/10
DASA (P&P) Review AP and RFP 12/08/10
RFP release 12/15/10
Receive Proposals 01/17/11
Proposal Evaluation 05/07/11
Prepare contracts 05/20/11
DASA P&P Review 08/26/11
Congressional/EEO Notifications 08/31/11
Award contracts 9/3/11
Post Award Conferences 09/20/11


Question #6:
Will consideration be given to expanding the page limitation of, at least, Volumes I and II (Technical and Management)? It seems that an acquisition of this nature, including the Salient Characteristics in Appendix A, the instructions, and the evaluation criteria, that more pages could be required to adequately address all of the issues.
Response:
Based on previous experience with similar acquisitions, the page count is adequate to accurate address the content and intent of offerors proposals.
Question #7:
Recommend you reduce the number of awards. A large number of awards will potentially lengthen the acquisition and source selection process and make any potential logistics support programs difficult to manage.
Response:
The Government intends to make the number of awards shown in the draft RFP to ensure maintaining a viable competitive base across the period of performance of the contracts.

Question #8:
While it is recognized that you are interested in demonstrated performance particularly for the US Army (p15, L.5.0 Volume I, Technical), will proven experience with nearly if not identical requirements performed for another branch of the US Armed Services be scored lower upon evaluation by the selection authority?
Response:
Valid point. . . . particularly for the US Army. will be replaced with . . . in a combat environment.

Question #9:
Can a proposed large business prime contractor also be subcontractor on the team of a proposed small business prime. Likewise, can a proposed small business prime also be a subcontractor on the team of a proposed large business prime?
Response:
Yes, but the small businesses are required to perform 51% of the effort.

Question #10:
In the information provided it states the following: Offerors, small or large, competing for an Integrated Base Defense contract award must be able to provide the preponderance of the capabilities and products required under this solicitation. The Government will also consider offerors that team with companies capable of providing the preponderance of the capabilities and products needed. What metric is the government going to use in determining factor for preponderance of the capabilities and products?
Response:
The Government will use the RFP Section M.3.2 standard to evaluate an offerors experience providing the required capabilities.

Question #11:
According to the RFP, the Government will use data provided by each Offeror in Volume II- Performance Risk and may use data obtained from other sources in the development of performance risk assessments for each Offeror. What other sources does the government intend to use in the development of the risk assessment?
Response:
The primary sources for past performance information are as stated in the RFP, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and Past Performance Questionnaires. If other validated sources are available to the evaluation team, those sources may be used also during evaluations.

Question #12:
During a review of the SEIWG Technical Architecture, we found numerous comments and notes that would indicate that changes, edits, or corrections are to be made to the document. Did we receive the final version of the document or is there another version that should be used by contractors in support of this contract?
Response:
SEIWG ICD 0101A dated May 2009 is final edition which supersedes all previous changes. The version provided is the final document, which is applicable for this acquisition. The comments shown in the Disposition of Comments section were included to capture pertinent comments made during development of the document.

Question #13:
Iraq and Afghanistan are specifically mentioned as deployment areas. Are there any other countries / Areas of Responsibility we should anticipate being asked to support?
Response:
If performance in other countries is required over the period of performance of the contracts, the delivery order(s) will specify the countries. Adjustments to the contracts may be made based on the location and complexity of the work to be performed.

Question #14:
PSC operating licenses are expensive and difficult to obtain. Is the cost of licensing reimbursable? What assistance will we receive from the government in obtaining the required weapons permits/security service licenses? If partnered with a company holding a current license, under what circumstances will the government allow that license to cover all team members?
Response:
No weapons are required or authorized. The Government will provide force protection when in designated hostile fire areas.

Question #15:
Will the government provide facilities / weapons for pre-deployment weapons certification or will this be done in country by the contractor?
Response:
No, not under this contract. Any weapons certification or system/component qualification will be performed under separate services contracts. This contract is for the procurement of approved COTS and NDI hardware. System level factory acceptance testing will be conducted at contractor provided facilities in most instances. Exceptions in which the Government elects to provide Government facilities andor GFE to facilitate acceptance testing will be clearly identified in the DO.

Question #16:
Will the government establish a common Standards of Conduct for all contractor personnel?
Response:
Yes. Standard FAR provisions such as Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
Apply. Additionally, JCC-I/A Clause 952.225-0004, Compliance With Laws and Regulations governing Iraq and Afghanistan will also be included in all contracts awarded.

Question #17:
Will contractors be required / encouraged to / prohibited from acquiring hardened vehicles in the execution of the contracted duties?
Response:
Not required and not prohibited. However, all movement within designated hostile fire areas will be controlled by the combatant commander and will be subject to escort or other designated restrictions.

Question #18:
Will the government allow non-U.S. companies to bid, either as Prime or Sub?
Response:
Yes within the limits of applicable US statutes and guidance in the Federal Acquisition Regulations. Also, please note that a security clearance level of Secret is required. Foreign nationals cannot be granted security clearances.

Question #19:
Will NATO / Allied Forces security clearances be accepted?
Response:
NO& NATO / Allied Forces clearances are not interchangeable with a US SECRET Clearance which is specified under Clause H.23.

Question #20:
According to the draft RFP the Technical Factor is based on the ten required capabilities identified in the SOO. The evaluation will be based on an offerors proven experience delivering products that provide the required capabilities. Is the Prime required to have delivered the capabilities?
Response:
The offeror-team is required to have proven experience delivering products that provide the required capabilities. Past performance considers how much work which is relevant to the current procurement has been performed and how well it has been performed. Performance by a subcontractor or teaming partner would be considered, however, contractual relationship and level of dedication of the proposed subcontractor or teaming partner would have to be established and documented through Teaming Agreements, the Sub-contracting Plans, and the Small Businees Participation Plan since only the prime is responsible to the Government for performance of the required work.

Question #21:
On page 105 under the Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear Explosives (CBRNE) it states the following: Provide modular, tailorable and scalable CBRNE detection, identification, protection, response, warning, and information management capabilities for critical missions (Fixed and handheld sensors). Should the information systems be compatible with any existing government sensors? Which ones? Should the sensors be compatible with any existing government information systems? Which ones?
Response:
The Government preference is for open architecture communications solutions using government and industry standard protocols for wired and wireless data and video communications (i.e. RS-232, RS-422, RS-170, IEEE 801.11x, etc.) Proprietary data interfaces are highly discouraged.

Question #22:
Does the government intend to hold an industry day to facilitate the distribution of information? If so, when and where?
Response:
No industry day is planned currently. The draft RFP was issued with an ample period ot time for questions and answers provided to facilitate the distribution of information.

Question #23:
In the past four months there have been at least 7 RFIs requested by at least 3 different contracting commands for BETSS-C family of systems capabilities, products, improvements, and/or support. Is there an over-arching acquisition strategy that defines how all these requests fit into or are integrated with the current Integrated Base Defense ID/IQ contract.
Response:
This acquisition, the Force Protection Omnibus acquisition, is not directly related to other acquisitions currently being planned.

Question #24:
Item 3 states, Offerors, small or large, competing for an Integrated Base Defense contract award must be able to provide the preponderance of the capabilities and products required under this solicitation. Given the breadth and depth of the equipment in the salient characteristics list, please define preponderance of the capabilities and products in objective terms.

Response:
Please see the answer to Question #10.

Question #25:
Section L.7.2 states that Offerors shall ensure that completed questionnaires are submitted to the Government no later than 1 week before the proposal due date. As the Offerors can control when the Questionnaires are sent to each Customer Program Manager and Contract POC, but not when those POCs submit their questionnaires to the Government, will the Government consider revising the requirement to specify a due date for delivery of the questionnaires to the appropriate POCs and the list of submitted questionnaires to the Government?
Response:
Sorry, No. The Questionnaires are due to the Government no later than 1 week before the proposal due date as stated in the draft RFP. This is a standard suspense in most Government RFPs requiring a Past Performance questionnaire.

Question #26:
Does the Government intend for the Offeror to provide the complete text of each Teaming Agreement or is a signature page or signed letter of intent sufficient?
Response:
As stated in the RFP the offeror shall provide . . . a signed document (format as established by Offeror) indicating a legally binding agreement (i.e., Teaming Agreements) among the parties. A full Teaming Agreement is not required, however a short narrative detailing what the companies agree to in their arrangement in terms of level of effort by each firm is beneficiary to the offeror.

Question #27:
The first paragraph in the section states that the Small Business Participation goal is not less than 15%, yet the category table adds up to 16%. Please clarify.
Response:
At least 15% of the total dollar value must be sub-contracted to small businesses, when applicable. Of the amount sub-contracted to small businesses the allocations to the socio-economic categories shown in the table in Section H.21 of the draft RFP is 16% of the total value sub-contracted to all small busihnesses.

Question #28:
Does the Government have an estimate for the proposal response time for the individual Delivery Orders?

Response:
While proposal response time will vary depending on the size, dollar amount and complexity of the Delivery Order. Delivery Order proposal response time is planned to be 45 days or less, primarily due to time required to conduct the appropriate level of Peer Review.

Question #29:
It is unclear what we are pricing in the pricing volume. Will fielding and sustainment be proposed as a rate only in the main proposal in which case specific hours (at those specific rates) be bid under each delivery order based on the installation size and required equipment?
Response:
Fielding and sustainment will be priced in the individual Delivery Orders based upon the CONUS/OCONUS delivery location, ancillory services such as assembly, installation, etc and the sustainment warranty in that specific location.
Question #30:
It is unclear what we are pricing in the pricing volume. Will a sample delivery order be provided in the final RFP, with a response required for submission with the proposal?
Response:
The Government is still exploring courses of action in this volume. Presently, the Pricing volume is for products only, which may be procured as needed. An initial Delivery Order may be included for purposes of evaluation, and possible award following the base contract award. However, the initial Delivery Order will not likely include the full range of products to be included in the contract.

Question#31:
Will the Government be supplying a GFE list with the final RFP?
Response:
No GFE list will be provided in the Base contract IAW with the final RFP. However, if it becomes necessary at a later date to provide GFE in order to successfully accomplish a Delivery Order, the specific GFE will be identified in the individual Delivery Order RFP.

Question #32:
Will a single prime be providing all assets for an installation or will multiple primes be supplying components for installation?
Response:
Delivery Order requirements will not be broken up into separate orders. However, a single installation may have multiple primes working on it due to the award of separate Delivery Orders issued to fullfill specific requirements identified at the time of issuance of the Delivery Order RFP. However, this is a good point, which may develop into a potential evaluation criterion at the Delivery Order level in order to reduce the number of individual Prime contractors deploying overseas, which of course is expensive to the Government, and the offerors.

Question #33:
Salient Characteristics of the BETSS-C system are provided. Is the Government seeking procurement of other complete Integrated Base Defense systems, or primarily additional BETSS-C systems and enhancements?
Response:
Complete Integrated Base Defense systems of which BETSS-C systems or components may or may not be included in future Delivery Orders. A central objective of the Force Protection Omnibus acquisition is to allow the Government to procure the required capabilities listed in the SOO. These capabilities and their salient characteristics include BETSS-C and other requirements. Any or all of the capabilities may be procured over the period of performance of the contracts.

Question #34:
Salient Characteristics of the BETSS-C system are provided. Is the Government seeking to procure additional sensor capabilities to be integrated with the BETSS-C family of systems? If so, can the government make specific RF Communications and COP system interfaces available?
Response:
No, at this time no additional integration, communications or COP requirements are planned. If the planning changes, the Delivery Orders issued under the future contracts will include specific requirements not addressed in the RFP.

Question #35:
Page 108, Attachment 5, Core Product List
What is the purpose of this list? Will contractors be requested to propose their ability to deliver the exact items on this list or will they be proposing their ability to deliver items that provide a similar capability?
Response:
The Government desires to procure form, fit and functionally equivalent hardware solutions having the salient characteristics listed. However, the Core Product List maybe revised or removed from the final Force Protection Omnibus RFP.



Question #36:
The synopsis states that section 20 shows the acquisition milestone schedule, yet it was not included. Please publish the acquisition milestone schedule.
Response:
Please see the response to Question #5.

Update #2 ·

Added: Jun 17, 2010 5:18 pm Modified: Jul 15, 2010 5:00 pmTrack Changes Questions will be accepted by the Government until 23 July 2010 on this Draft Request for Proposal. Answers to the Questions will be posted no later than 30 July 2010. No proposals will be accepted at this time. All questions should be sent to the Contract Specialist: Sandra Privett at sandra.a.privett@us.army.mil

Please see the following URL for the documents: https://www3.natick.army.mil

Update #1 ·

Added: Jun 17, 2010 5:18 pm Description: Sources Sought Notice-Market Research.

This is not a solicitation for bids/proposals, but a Request for Information to conduct market re-search IAW FAR Part 10. The Product Manager, Force Protection Systems (PM-FPS) proposes to acquire inside-the-wire and outside-the-wire Force Protection and early warning systems. The intended scope is for a single, all-inclusive domain addressing the full range of requirements that fall within this lead descriptor.

Statement of Objectives
Integrated Base Defense Omnibus
1. Background.

The United States Army has an ongoing requirement to provide Integrated Base Defense (IBD) Force Protection capabilities at temporary and permanent, nuclear and non-nuclear at CONUS and OCONUS sites around the world. The ultimate goal is to provide forces with the capability to See First, Understand First, and Act First. Keys to achieving this goal are the application of capabilities that enhance security, surveillance and reconnaissance, resulting in the integration of security systems into an IBD common architecture configured to provide timely detection and quantification of potential threats, allowing the rapid application of appropriate, effective response to mitigate or eliminate verified threats.

To meet the growing demand and complexity of the IBD requirement, the Army will make multiple awards under this Request for Proposal (RFP). Awards may be made to up to 20-30 Large and Small businesses awards in the Full and Open Lot, and 10-15 awards in the Partial Small Business Set-Aside Lot. The multiple contracts provide a rapid, flexible methodology to access the range and depth of capabilities necessary to protect Soldiers and other personnel around the globe.

These contracts will provide access to force protection capabilities with modular systems, equipment, and components that can be used as stand-alone or integrated systems to protect a range of installation sizes from small units and assets to large base-wide mission areas. IBD system components will consist of Commercial-Off-The Shelf (COTS) and Non-Development Items (NDI). Additionally the Government will procurement of the products will include a sustainment warranty for installed and deployed IBD systems. The sustainment warranty will include training and initial sustainment.

Site tailored requirements will be provided in Delivery Orders (DO) that will include Site Survey Packages. Performance of multiple DOs may overlap, requiring concurrent installation and warranty support sat many installations in different locations including quick reaction support to temporary and permanent fixed site deployments around the world, especially during Overseas Contingency Operations.

The intent of this acquisition is to provide personnel with integrated security systems significantly reduce the time required to detect, assess, and neutralize or mitigate anticipated threats while re-ducing manpower levels (or staffing requirements) wherever possible. IBD provides a line of defense for all critical assets (fixed, temporary or mobile) through electronic detection; alarm assessment; access control; communications; and command, control, and display capabilities.

2. Program Objectives.

The mission of the Product Manager Force Protection Systems (PM-FPS) is to acquire physical security systems, sensors, and related hardware to provide surveillance, security and safety for Warfighters and other personnel at military installations worldwide including Forward Operating Bases (FOB). Integral to the success of this mission is the ability to compete requirements among qualified contractors in an efficient and timely manner. Acquisition Reform initiatives have made available avenues intended to increase the efficiency and timeliness of the acquisition process. One of the central Acquisition Reform initiatives is the creation of Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts that allow competition of individual DOs. PM-FPSs objective is to establish long-term, competitively awarded, contract vehicles which include a pre-qualified group of contractors to compete for delivery orders under this IDIQ contract. PM-FPSs intent is to allow each selected contractor a fair opportunity to be considered for all subsequent DO level requirements within the contracts statement of objectives, supporting the range and depth of the required capabilities.
Companies awarded contracts must possess management capability to provide materiel solutions relevant to the mission of PM-FPS with specific expertise in the systems, equipment and compo-nents required under the contracts at the DO level. The Government intends to procure products that have been tested and fielded under previous US Government contracts. Further, these companies must be able to form and credibly manage teams prior to contract award, or on a DO basis. This statement of objectives includes the assembly; integration; delivery; testing; fielding; training; and initial sustainment of Force Protection systems and equipment including the hardware/software required for effective force protection.
3. Contract Objectives.

The mission of PM-FPS is to acquire inside-the-wire and outside-the-wire Force Protection and early warning systems. The intended objective is for a single, all-inclusive domain addressing the full range of requirements that fall within this lead descriptor. Integral to the success of this mission is the ability to compete requirements amongst qualified contractors in the most efficient and timely manner possible. PM-FPS objective is to establish a long-term, competitively awarded, IDIQ contract vehicle with a select group of highly qualified contractors. PM-FPS intent is to then allow each selected contractor a fair opportunity to be considered for all subsequent DO level re-quirements within the statement of objectives, supporting the breadth and depth of the applicable Warfighter Force Protection requirements. US agencies and NATO partners may procure the re-quirements and have them delivered to CONUS and/or OCONUS sites.
A company must (as a Prime contractor) be able to provide stand alone or integrated solutions with proven capabilities to support the PM-FPS mission. Further, these companies must be able to form and effectively manage teams, under a DO, capable of providing innovative and creative solutions, potentially across the breadth and depth of the PM-FPS mission area. This objectives include:

" Intrusion Detection capabilities to scan and / or determine the safety risk of people and vehicles, Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) materials. The types of systems capable of providing the information needed to make safety determinations include but are not limited to, Ground Surveillance Radar, Unattended Ground Systems, Cameras and Imagers, and Subterranean / Subsurface remotely controlled scanners, biometric and CBRN sensors. Mountings include, but are not limited to, surface and sub-surface; air vehicle; water vehicle; ground vehicle; or tower placements.


" Explosive Materials detection capabilities that provide remote non-intrusive inspections, close up inspections using hand held detectors, swipe and swab vapor and particle detectors and other comparable equipment.

" Entry Denial capabilities including Active-Barriers-Popup-Drop Down, High Frequency Sound emission, Passive Bollards, Grab Systems, and personnel identification

" Acoustic Hailing Devices capabilities for notification

" Autonomous Unmanned Systems with capabilities to detect, assess, and respond. Examples of the types of systems providing these capabilities include Unmanned Air Vehicles, Unmanned Ground Vehicles, and Remotely Operated Weapons

" Ancillary capabilities to be included with the delivered systems and equipment shipments, i.e., installation tools, test equipment, packaging.
4. Performance Objectives

Equipment functions may include, but are not limited to command and control, mission planning, and product integration support.

System, equipment and component performance minimums include two overarching objectives:

" Interface capabilities that meet the applicable Security Equipment Integration Working Group (SEIWG) standards contained in Appendix A (Interface Specifications for the DoD Base and Installation Security Systems (BISS), SEIWG 005B of 31 March 2005) and Appendix B (SEIWG Interface Control Document SEIWG ICD-0100XML Information Exchange of 27 October 2006)

" Performance capabilities that meet or exceed the IBD Omnibus Contract System and Equip-ment Performance Criteria.

IBD capabilities are the underpinning of Integrated, Base, Unit and Installation Protection whose capabilities include detect, assess, warn, defend, and recover.

" Detect. The ability to collect timely and accurate data/information about adversary capabilities.
" Assess. The capability to develop an understanding of the situation and accurately identify ad-versary capabilities that can be used against friendly personnel, physical assets, and information and precisely derive adversary courses of action, planned or employed, with the intent to destroy, or disrupt, operational readiness. Additionally, begin development of a course (or courses) of action, and orders for execution.
" Warn. The development of a course (s) of action, and orders for execution that will allow re-sponse to actionable intelligence and information.
" Defend. The ability to execute a selected course of action to resist hostile actions directed against friendly personnel, physical assets, and information in order to preserve operational capabilities. Once a commander makes a decision, the commander puts the decision into action or instructs others to act in support of the chosen course of action.
" Recover. Actions taken during, or after a hostile attack to restore friendly personnel, physical assets, and information to full operational readiness.

5. Management Objectives.

The NAICS Code for this effort is 423610 Security Systems Merchant Wholesalers (Size standard is 100 employees). The planned acquisition approach is to award between 20-30 contracts to Large and Small businesses in the Full and Open Lot, and 10-15 contracts in the Partial Small Business Set-Aside Lot to companies who provide best value with demonstrated performance and experience to provide stand-alone systems and integrated system-solutions that meet the required capabilities. However, the Government reserves the right to award more or less awards in each Lot dependent upon the quality of the proposals in response to the Request for Proposal for this effort. Once the contracts are awarded, the Government will compete delivery orders among the appropriate Lot, but reserves the right to make awards on an Exception to Fair Opportunity basis due to Government requirements. The IDIQ contracts are available to US agencies and NATO partners, which may centrally procure Delivery Orders through RDECOM to fulfill their requirements with delivery to CONUS and/or OCONUS sites. The total funding and contract ceiling is estimated at $997M for this effort.

Included in the solicitation is a partial small business set-aside competition language IAW FAR Clause 52.219-7 Notice of Partial Small Business Set-Aside that will allow a number of awards to be made to small businesses including Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned & 8a companies contingent upon receipt of acceptable proposals from responsible and qualified Small Business Offerors. As such, contracts to be awarded under this solicitation will be made in two 2 separate Lots - 1 Full & Open Lot and 2 Small Business Set-Aside Lot. The small business set-aside award decision will be made after consideration of all proposals received from both large and small business for award in the Full & Open Lot. After consideration of all proposals in the Full & Open Lot, the Government will then consider ONLY those proposals from Small Business Offerors for award un-der the Small Business Set-Aside Lot. It is possible that a small business may be selected for award in both Lots. In such case, the small business will be awarded a contract in the Full & Open Lot and a separate contract in the Small Business Set-Aside Lot. Small Business Offerors that receive an award on a small business set-aside basis will be subject to FAR Clause 52.219-14 Limitations in Subcontracting over the life of the contract. Small Business Offerors that receive an award in the Full & Open Lot will not be subject to this clause for orders issued under this Lot.

Scheduled for contract award in the third quarter FY11, this acquisition will result in multiple com-petitively awarded contracts to a cadre of best qualified contractors possessing the business prac-tices and capability to provide the required products and ancillary services required for fielding, training and initially sustaining the force protection products. The proposed approach is to award multiple, five-year, Firm Fixed Price FFP IDIQ contracts with a thirty six -month base period and one twenty four month option. Delivery orders will be competed among the selected contractors within an appropriate Lot over the period of performance of the contracts based on Government requirements and funding availability. For each capability, the Government plans to procure a sustainment warranty which includes New Equipment Training NET, sustainment training and scheduled and unscheduled sustainment maintenance.

The Government intends to award contracts to the Offerors whose proposal represents the best value to the Government. Best value means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Governments estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement.

The objective of the contracts is to ensure rapid, cost effective and streamlined contracting for delivery of high quality products at fair and reasonable prices. PM-FPS desires to minimize pre-award acquisition costs at both the IDIQ and DO levels for the Government and industry. PM-FPS intends to achieve this with an inclusive, broadbase of Prime contractor teams and small businesses. This approach provides PM-FPS and its customers with direct access to a broad array of potential providers. The emphasis on selecting capable large business, prime contractor teams and small businesses at the IDIQ contract level allows access to numerous small businesses which pos-sess innovative, creative and often niche solutions that might otherwise be precluded from competing if relegated to a subcontractor role.

6. Definitions.

" Integrated Base Defense (IBD) is the integrated application of offensive and defensive actions, both active and passive, taken across the ground dimension of the Force Protection battle space to achieve local and area dominance.

" Force Protection Battle space. This battle space consists of the following areas and battle spaces where the objective is dominance and increased situational understanding by security forces through the integration of manpower, training, technology, tactics, techniques, and procedures including, but not limited to:

" Outside the Wire. The area beyond the base perimeter to include the man-portable surface-to-air missile launch footprint and other areas of interest as designated by the commander.

" Base Perimeter. The legal boundary of the installation, site, or facility being protected, wherein the commander exercises area control and influence.

" Protection Level (PL) Resources. Resources and assets that, due to their unique tactical, strategic or monetary value, require definitive, robust Force Protection measures. Some ex-amples of PL resources are:
- Command, control, communications, and computer systems critical to the success of active nuclear missions
- Non-nuclear alert forces
- Expensive, few in number, or one of a kind systems
- Weapons systems not on alert but that can be programmed for alert status
- Selected command, control, and communications facilities
- Non-nuclear weapons storage areas
- Parking and alert areas containing mission ready aircraft
- Maintenance and storage areas necessary to operate aircraft (e.g., Petroleum, Oils and
- Lubricants storage
Critical infrastructure e.g., railways, rail yards, bridges, ports, water supplies, power generating facilities and distribution terminals

" Flight line. The area of an installation typically defined by the runway(s), taxiways, aircraft parking areas, hangars, etc.

" Transients. In bound/out bound aircraft and convoys conveying personnel or resources.

" Cantonment Area. The area of the base containing organizations and facilities essential to operations.

" Site Survey Package. Each DO for installation of an IBD system will include a Government furnished site survey package for each installation site specified in the DO. Site survey packages will be supplied in one of three possible levels of detail.

" Detailed. Detailed survey packages will include 3D terrain databases, photographs and/or drawings detailing locations of end item components to be installed. Typical components will include, but will not be limited to optical, acoustic, vibration, photo electric, x-ray, and radar sensors; fixed and movable barriers, gates, turnstiles, hailing devices; traffic control and signaling devices; portable and fixed sensor, lighting, and personnel towers; modems, routers, communications hubs, recorders, computers, desks, displays operator consoles and other operator interfaces. Each component location description will include a list of relevant available utilities and infrastructure, such as electrical power, telephone, network, and other communications resources, fencing and accessibility.

" Reduced Detail. Reduced detail survey packages may be provided for smaller installations having less demanding Force Protection requirements. These packages will include 3D terrain databases, photographs and/or drawings detailing general locations of end item compo-nent locations and performance oriented sensor requirements such as range, resolution, field of view, description of the anticipated threat to be monitored and mitigated, and other relevant information. The contractor shall propose the best value mix of sensors and components to meet the IBD Force Protection performance requirement. Typical components will include, but will not be limited to optical, acoustic, vibration, photo electric, x-ray, and ra-dar sensors; fixed and movable barriers, gates, turnstiles; hailing devices, traffic control and signaling devices; portable and fixed sensor, lighting, and personnel towers; modems, routers, communications hubs, recorders, computers, desks, displays operator consoles and other operator interfaces. Each component location description will include a list of relevant available utilities and infrastructure, such as electrical power, telephone, network, and other communications resources, fencing and accessibility.

" Limited Detail. Limited detail survey packages may be provided for very small installations such as a single building, small group of buildings or small compound where the entire pe-rimeter can be viewed from 1 to 4 vantage points. Terrain information may be limited to drawings and/or photographs, or types and numbers of components may be specified along with approximate distances between component locations and the operator location. Limited detail surveys will typically be associated with portable or relocatable IBD suites. Limited detail surveys may also be used to specify components purchased for installation or use by third party entities and/or to purchase non-integrated standalone Force Protection hard-ware.

" Transformational security technologies are those that will provide a leap in capability over todays traditional security systems. Examples of transformational security technology areas include, but are not limited to:

- Wide area intrusion detection and tracking
- Long range assessment 1-5 km and 5-10 km per the Integrated Base Defense Security System IBDSS draft Operational Requirements Document ORD
- Integrated C2 -- Situational Awareness
- Wireless, secure communications
- Identification friend or foe
- Robotics unmanned, remotely operated, air or ground equipment
- Rapid, positive base access control
- Remotely operated weapons lethal and non-lethal
- Integration of smart sensors e.g., sensors that not only detect and track, but assess and characterize the target as well
- Stand-off explosives detection
- Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear detection
- Non-Lethal denial systems
- Remote sensing e.g., aerostat, unmanned air vehicles UAV
- Fly-away security systems i.e., turn-key systems capable of immediate use by the intended user

Interested persons or companies may identify their interest and capability, including any available systems on hand, to respond to this requirement with a short description and time necessary to fully meet the require-ment. Also, please include company size relative to NAICS 423610 and social economic classification if applicable. This SSN is neither a Request for Proposal, nor an Invitation to Bid, nor a Request for Quotation. Therefore, this SSN is not to be construed as a commitment by the Government to enter into a contract nor will the Government pay for information provided in response to this SSN. No RFP will be posted to Army Single Face to Industry ASFI as a result of this announcement. Submit via e-mail to Sandra Privett at sandra.privett@us.army.mil within ten (10)calendar days of publication of this synopsis.

Points of Contact:

Contract Specialist: Sandra A. Privett, sandra.privett@us.army.mil

Contracting officer: Brian P. Murphy, brian.murphy3@us.army.mil

Address: US Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, RDECOM Natick Acquisition Center, ATTN: Sandra A. Privett, 13501 Ingenuity Drive, Orlando, Fl 32826

Notice history

Notices posted for this opportunity, newest first
Notice Type Posted
Multiple Award (Full and Open Competition) of Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Force Protection Systems for Integrated Base Defense capabilities for CONUS and OCONUS security of sites and personnel Latest Award Notice
Questions and Answers This notice · Original Award Notice

On GovTribe

Work this opportunity on GovTribe

  • Track it in your pipeline
  • Find teaming partners
  • Similar opportunities
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this opportunity