Keyport Logistics and Technical Support Services - Special Notice
Open Special Notice Posted
- Solicitation number
- N0025326XXXXX
- Agency
-
Naval Sea Systems Command
Department of the Navy, Department of Defense
- Responses due
- Set-aside
- No set-aside
Opportunity facts
- NAICS code
- 541330 Engineering Services
- Place of performance
- Keyport, Washington 98345, United States
Notice details come from SAM.gov. Updated .
About this opportunity
Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division, Keyport is conducting market research under FAR Part 10 regarding logistics and technical support services, with responses due November 4, 2026 at 17:00 PST; this opportunity is restricted to SeaPort NXG MAC holders only. NUWCDIVKPT seeks industry input on the viability of executing upcoming taskings under a Firm-Fixed-Price Level-of-Effort CLIN structure, with the primary objective of determining whether requirements can be reliably priced, scheduled, and delivered on an FFP Level-of-Effort basis without transferring excessive or unmanageable performance risk to either contractor or Government. Respondents must address two specific inquiry areas: feasibility assessment of whether the organization can execute the complete scope on an FFP Level-of-Effort basis (or identify which discrete tasks require alternate structures), and execution approach and pricing basis, including scoping, estimation, and delivery methodologies if FFP level-of-effort pricing is viable. Responses will inform the acquisition strategy, Performance Work Statement/Statement of Work development, and eventual solicitation structure. Work is classified under NAICS 541330 (Engineering Services) and PSC R425 (Support—Professional: Engineering/Technical). Interested SeaPort NXG MAC holders must register for PIEE accounts to submit responses. Points of contact are Contracting Officer Angela Barlow and Contract Specialist Stacy Noble.
Notice text
2 versions
Update #2 · Latest ·
***This opportunity is for SEAPORT NXG MAC HOLDERS ONLY. No other offers will be considered. SeaPort MAC holders will need to register for PIEE accounts in order to receive solicitations and submit proposals/offers.***”.
Issuing Activity: Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division, Keyport
Notice Type: Request for Information (RFI) /Market Research
NAICS Code: 541330 - Engineering Services
Product Service Code (PSC): R425
Response Due Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2026 at 17:00 PST
Point of Contact: Contracting Officer, Angela Barlow; Contract Specialist, Stacy Noble
Purpose and Operational Context
Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division, Keyport (NUWCDIVKPT) is conducting market research in accordance with FAR Part 10 to determine industry capability, capacity, and commercial best practices regarding the execution of upcoming taskings under a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Level-of-Effort CLIN structure.
The primary objective is to evaluate whether requirements can be reliably priced, scheduled, and delivered on an FFP Level-of-Effort basis without transferring excessive or unmanageable performance risk to either the contractor or the Government. Responses will directly inform the acquisition strategy, Performance Work Statement (PWS)/Statement of Work (SOW) development, and eventual solicitation structure.
The Government requests that interested industry respondents address the specific inquiry areas outlined below:
- Area 1: Feasibility – FFP Level-of-Effort Viability Assessment
State definitively whether your organization can propose and execute the complete scope of taskings on a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Level-of Effort basis. If only portions are feasible under FFP Level-of-Effort, identify which discrete tasks can be FFP Level-of-Effort and which require alternate structures.
- Area 2: Execution Approach and Pricing Basis
Describe your proposed execution approach and pricing basis. If FFP level-of-effort pricing is feasible, explain how you will scope, estimate, and deliver the work, including key milestones, deliverables, verifiable acceptance criteria, and labor/material estimating methods used to support price stability. If FFP level-of-effort pricing is not feasible, identify and, where practicable, quantify the technical, operational, schedule, supply-chain, Government-furnished property, requirements, or regulatory uncertainties that drive cost risk and preclude a firm-fixed-price approach.
- Area 3: Delivery and Quality assessment
Describe how your organization will demonstrate its ability to consistently deliver quality work under an FFP contract. Include the quality management processes, qualified personnel, relevant past performance, inspection/testing methods, internal review procedures, corrective-action processes, and objective evidence—such as quality plans, certifications, sample reports, performance metrics, or customer references—that support your capability to meet contract requirements, schedule, and acceptance criteria.
- Area 4: Pricing Premium Assessment
Please describe any anticipated impact to proposed pricing if the Government were to use an FFP contract type in lieu of a Cost contract. Specifically, would the shift to FFP result in a price premium to account for an increase in contractor risk? If so please provide an estimated percentage range and identify the principle risk factors contributing to this risk premium.
Response Instructions & Submission Structure
- Section 1: Corporate Profile - Page Limit: 2 Pages
Company name, CAGE code, UEI number, Seaport MAC Number, business size status under relevant NAICS, and primary corporate POC.
- Section 2: Capability Assessment – Page Limit: 8 Pages
Direct responses to Areas 1 through 4 above, including specific breakdown of FFP Level-of-Effort execution methodologies or risk rationale.
- Section 3: Relevant Past Performance – Page Limit: 3 Pages
Up to three (3) examples of similar requirements successfully executed under an FFP Level-of-Effort or hybrid contract structure within the past five (5) years.
Government Disclaimer (FAR 15.101 FAR Overhaul)
1. Non-Binding Notice
RFI is issued solely for information and planning purposes. It does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP), a promise to issue an RFP in the future, or an invitation for bid.
2. No Reimbursement
Government will not pay for any information or administrative costs incurred in response to this announcement. All costs associated with responding are solely at the interested party's expense.
3. Market Research Usage Only
Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract. This RFI is issued solely for information and planning purposes; it does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP) or a commitment to issue a solicitation in the future. Responses will be treated as information only and not as a proposal.
Update #1 ·
***This opportunity is for SEAPORT NXG MAC HOLDERS ONLY. No other offers will be considered. SeaPort MAC holders will need to register for PIEE accounts in order to receive solicitations and submit proposals/offers.***”.
Issuing Activity: Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division, Keyport
Notice Type: Request for Information (RFI) /Market Research
NAICS Code: 541330 - Engineering Services
Product Service Code (PSC): R425
Response Due Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2026 at 17:00 PST
Point of Contact: Contracting Officer, Angela Barlow; Contract Specialist, Stacy Noble
Purpose and Operational Context
Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division, Keyport (NUWCDIVKPT) is conducting market research in accordance with FAR Part 10 to determine industry capability, capacity, and commercial best practices regarding the execution of upcoming taskings under a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Level-of-Effort CLIN structure.
The primary objective is to evaluate whether requirements can be reliably priced, scheduled, and delivered on an FFP Level-of-Effort basis without transferring excessive or unmanageable performance risk to either the contractor or the Government. Responses will directly inform the acquisition strategy, Performance Work Statement (PWS)/Statement of Work (SOW) development, and eventual solicitation structure.
The Government requests that interested industry respondents address the specific inquiry areas outlined below:
- Area 1: Feasibility – FFP Level-of-Effort Viability Assessment
State definitively whether your organization can propose and execute the complete scope of taskings on a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Level-of Effort basis. If only portions are feasible under FFP Level-of-Effort, identify which discrete tasks can be FFP Level-of-Effort and which require alternate structures.
- Area 2: Execution Approach and Pricing Basis
Describe your proposed execution approach and pricing basis. If FFP level-of-effort pricing is feasible, explain how you will scope, estimate, and deliver the work, including key milestones, deliverables, verifiable acceptance criteria, and labor/material estimating methods used to support price stability. If FFP level-of-effort pricing is not feasible, identify and, where practicable, quantify the technical, operational, schedule, supply-chain, Government-furnished property, requirements, or regulatory uncertainties that drive cost risk and preclude a firm-fixed-price approach.
- Area 3: Delivery and Quality assessment
Describe how your organization will demonstrate its ability to consistently deliver quality work under an FFP contract. Include the quality management processes, qualified personnel, relevant past performance, inspection/testing methods, internal review procedures, corrective-action processes, and objective evidence—such as quality plans, certifications, sample reports, performance metrics, or customer references—that support your capability to meet contract requirements, schedule, and acceptance criteria.
- Area 4: Pricing Premium Assessment
Please describe any anticipated impact to proposed pricing if the Government were to use an FFP contract type in lieu of a Cost contract. Specifically, would the shift to FFP result in a price premium to account for an increase in contractor risk? If so please provide an estimated percentage range and identify the principle risk factors contributing to this risk premium.
Response Instructions & Submission Structure
- Section 1: Corporate Profile - Page Limit: 2 Pages
Company name, CAGE code, UEI number, Seaport MAC Number, business size status under relevant NAICS, and primary corporate POC.
- Section 2: Capability Assessment – Page Limit: 8 Pages
Direct responses to Areas 1 through 5 above, including specific breakdown of FFP Level-of-Effort execution methodologies or risk rationale.
- Section 3: Relevant Past Performance – Page Limit: 3 Pages
Up to three (3) examples of similar requirements successfully executed under an FFP Level-of-Effort or hybrid contract structure within the past five (5) years.
Government Disclaimer (FAR 15.101 FAR Overhaul)
1. Non-Binding Notice
RFI is issued solely for information and planning purposes. It does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP), a promise to issue an RFP in the future, or an invitation for bid.
2. No Reimbursement
Government will not pay for any information or administrative costs incurred in response to this announcement. All costs associated with responding are solely at the interested party's expense.
3. Market Research Usage Only
Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract. This RFI is issued solely for information and planning purposes; it does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP) or a commitment to issue a solicitation in the future. Responses will be treated as information only and not as a proposal.
Notice history
| Notice | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| This notice | Special Notice | |
| Keyport Logistics and Technical Support Services - Sources Sought | Pre-Solicitation |
Similar open opportunities
| Opportunity | Agency | Set-aside | Responses due |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keyport Infrastructure Security Support Services (KISSS) | Naval Sea Systems Command | Total Small Business | |
| NUWC Division Keyport Industry Engagement - Wednesday with the Small Business Professional | Naval Sea Systems Command | No set-aside | |
| Navy Shore Sustainment Support | Naval Information Warfare Systems Command | No set-aside | |
| Weapons Effect Solicitation | Naval Sea Systems Command | No set-aside | |
| Request for Information and Draft PWS Feedback for DICE Laboratory Sustainment and Engineering Support | Naval Information Warfare Systems Command | No set-aside |
On GovTribe
Work this opportunity
- Track it in your pipeline
- Find teaming partners
- Similar opportunities
- Ask GovTribe AI about this opportunity