FormSF30_Green_Bay_Janitorial.pdf

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 STANDARD FORM 30. (Rev. 10-83) Previous Edition unusable Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Page of Pages AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code

2. AMENDMENT MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (if applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODE

(x) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., Street, Country, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ______ copies of amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OR OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

Check One

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Table of Contents

PAGE 2 OF 5 WC-133W-17-RQ-0049/A0001

SECTION

. 1 REVISED EVALUATION CRITERIA

PAGE 3 OF 5 WC-133W-17-RQ-0049/A0001

SECTION

. 1 REVISED EVALUATION CRITERIA

1352.213-70 Evaluation utilizing simplified acquisition procedures.

The Government will issue an order resulting from this request for quotation to the responsible offeror whose quotation results in the best value to the Government, considering both price and non-price factors. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price. The following factors will be used to evaluate quotations:

(1) Technical Approach and Capability. The offeror's approach to performing contract requirements and its capability to successfully perform the contract will be evaluated.

The contractor shall provide their technical approach for the following:

(a) The contractor shall provide a statement that they understand and agree to have an individual other than the person providing service (unless owned and operated by one individual) visit the office on quarterly basis to complete spot checks of work performed and that the name, title, and telephone number of this individual shall be provided within 15 days of award.

(b) Satisfactorily manage and outline and approach for cleaning in accordance with the Statement of Work.

(c) Ensure services will be performed in accordance with the Statement of Work without interruption if the regularly scheduled employee fails to show due to illness, injury, or vacation, quitting, etc.

(2) Past Performance. The offeror's past performance on related contracts will be evaluated to determine, as appropriate, successful performance of contract requirements, quality and timeliness of delivery of goods and services, cost management, communications between contracting parties, proactive management and customer satisfaction.

The contractor shall provide a list of at least two but no more than three contacts, including phone numbers, of past performance references that you have successfully accomplished services similar to size and scope of those listed in the statement of work.

(4) Price. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

The following line items will be used to evaluate low price:

(End of clause)

PAGE 4 OF 5 WC-133W-17-RQ-0049/A0001

TRADE OFF EVALUATION SCORING TECHNIQUE

Rating of Offers: Quotes will be adjectivally rated against each of the technical evaluation factors set forth in the RFQ, and shall be given an overall adjectival rating. The adjectival ratings to be used are:

TECHNICAL FACTOR RATINGS

RATING DESCRIPTION

Unsatisfactory The quote does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation or does not address the specific factor. The quoter’s interpretation of the

Government's requirements is so superficial, incomplete, vague, incompatible, incomprehensible, or incorrect as to be unacceptable. The assignment of a rating of "Unacceptable" indicates that numerous weaknesses exist requiring a major revision, tantamount to a new offer to make acceptable. The quote exhibits no strengths. Project failure is probable.

Satisfactory The quote meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation. The quote is responsive and provides assurance that the quoter will successfully accomplish the work. Any weakness is of a minor nature which poses little risk of adversely affecting the quoter’s performance. A rating of "Satisfactory" is used when there are no indications of strengths, features, or innovations which would enhance the specific requirements or otherwise be of benefit.

The quote demonstrates an acceptable probability of successful execution of the work.

Very Good The quote exceeds the requirements of the solicitation, is complete, organized, and detailed, and provides strong assurances that the quoter will successfully accomplish the work. A rating of "Very Good" means that this quote contains strengths, features, or innovations which would enhance the specific requirements or otherwise be of benefit. Any weaknesses are considered to be of such small consequence that their impact on the overall superiority of the quotation is insignificant. A high probability of success is demonstrated.

PAGE 5 OF 5 WC-133W-17-RQ-0049/A0001

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING

RATING DESCRIPTION

Outstanding

(9,10)

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant past performance information, the

Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Acceptable

(7, 8)

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable positive expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.

Marginal

(5, 6)

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a very low expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unacceptable

(4, 3, 2, 1)

Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a very low expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral

(0)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the quoter’s performance record is so sparse that a past performance rating cannot be assigned.

2. Each rating will be based on facts provided in each quoter’s technical quotation. Specific narrative comments regarding each quote, both positive and negative, shall be made on individual rating sheets, which will include an assessment of the quoter’s strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies. A final rating is also required.

3. Reviewer recommendation: The reviewer shall make a recommendation of award based on consideration of their strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies.

601 E 12TH STREET

ROOM 1734

KANSAS CITY MO 64106