Part 2 of Redacted Justification (2).pdf
PDF 177 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W91ZLK-20-Q-0007
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Justification.pdf | ||
| Scientific Equipment Combined Synopsis Clauses.docx | DOCX document | |
| SOW_Scientific Equipment_2019.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
7. ACTIONS TO INCREASE COMPETmON (For Contracting Personnel Use):
Market research has been conducted by both the customer and contract specialist. The customer has sent over market research quotes that have been obtained along with Internet searches to determine the most suitable instrumentation for documenting Chemical Biological Center (CCDC) test mission. Contract Specialist also searched the web (google searches) ,GSA and System for Award Management (SAM ). It has been indicated that there is not a possible expectation of obtaining offers from two or more responsible small business concerns that are competitive in terms of market prices, quality, and delivery to perform this require'lymt. -Ther~efore, recommending a Full and Open Competition among all interested vendors represented by NAICS Code 334516 .
A combined synopsis will be posted on Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) prior to award. This requirement will be awarded as a Firm-Fixed type contract using Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) as a source selection criteria .
{"type":"Document","isBackSide":false,"languages":["en-us"],"usedOnDeviceOCR":true}
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .