Exhibit_1_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
Air Medical Transport Ambulance Services
Solicitation number
W91YU0-16-R-0001
Issued by

About this file

Exhibit_1_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan

View the file

Other files

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation No W91YU0-16-R-0001 Exhibit 1

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SURVEILLANCE PLAN

for Air Medical Transport Ambulance Services Fort Hunter-Liggett, CA

1. OBJECTIVE: This plan provides a quality surveillance strategy for Air Medical Transport Ambulance Services at Ft Hunter-Liggett, CA. The primary purpose of this plan is to provide a basis for the Government’s evaluation of the Contractor’s key areas of performance under this contract. The Contracting Officer (KO), in conjunction with input provided by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), will evaluate the Contractor’s performance. Oversight of the Contractor’s performance will assure quality and consistency of contract performance.

1. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT OBJECTIVE: The key area(s) of the Contractor’s performance that will be evaluated during the term of the contract. The PWS reference will be provided for each performance measurement objective.

1. ASSESSMENT METHOD: Contractor performance is inspected and evaluated on key areas of performance.

1. ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL): The degree to which the Government will allow the Contractor’s key areas of performance to vary; the variance from the standard that the Contractor is allowed and the grading/measurement associated with deviation from the specific performance standard.

1. KEY AREAS OF PERFORMANCE:

The following Performance Measurements Requirement Summary applies. The Government may modify inspection methods in accordance with site specific requirements.

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE
STANDARD
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT

One aircraft available 24/7/365 Paras 1.1.1, 4.1

100% Compliance
An operational aircraft shall be available at all times
Monitored by COR

FAA Inspections Para. 1.1.2. and 1.2.2.1.3.

Submit inspection to KO time of offer, and annually.
Contractor’s MEDEVAC equipment must pass FAA inspection.
Monitored by COR.
Medical Liability Insurance Para 1.1.3.
Submit insurance documents to KO.
Contactor and subcontractor’s must have min $1M per accident, and $3M per aggregate.
Monitored by COR.

Possess and maintain current certifications and licenses Para 1.2.

Provide proof of certifications and licenses as required.
100% compliance.
Annual review of COR files.

Possess and maintain CARB certification Para 1.2.2.1.2

Provide proof of certifications and licenses as required.
100% compliance.
Annual review of COR files.

Response time met Para 5

10 minutes from initial call/request to helicopter transport to on scene arrival time for all High Risk training.
100% compliance.
Monitored by COR
Comply with Health and Immunization Requirements Para 7.
Evidence that physician has complied.
100% compliance.
Annual review of COR files.

Complete documentation of patient treatment per PWS Para 5.

Treatment and care shall be recorded and forwarded within 72 hours.
All required documentation completed. No significant omissions.
Clinic reviews records to determine if assessments are complete, timely, and appropriate.

Contractor Manpower Report (CMR).

Para 9.

Complete Contractor Manpower Report.
Reports shall be submitted as required 100% of the time.
Review CMR records to ensure was completed. Contract Specialist and COR Monitors.

Sexual Assault Reportin Para 1.1.4.

100% compliance (zero tolerance) Report within 24 hours.

Reports shall be submitted as required 100% of the time.
COR documentation and program review. Any non-compliance must brought to the immediate attention of the KO

Sexual Harassment Reporting Para 1.1.4 100% compliance (zero tolerance) Report within 24 hours.

Reports shall be submitted as required 100% of the time.
COR documentation and program review. Any non-compliance must brought to the immediate attention of the KO

Combating Trafficking in persons (awareness program)

FAR 52.222-50

100% compliance (zero tolerance) regarding trafficking in persons policy
FAR 52.222-50 and FAR 22.1703
COR documentation and program review. Any non-compliance must brought to the immediate attention of the KO
STANDARDMEASUREMENTPAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
99% to 100%ExceptionalDocument Past Performance
96% to 98%Very GoodAssessment Report, paying particular attention
95%Satisfactoryto performance that exceeds the standard.
92% to 94%Marginal
92% or LessUnsatisfactory

Note: Government surveillance of contractor performance is not limited to the Performance Objectives as outlined in this PRS. The Government reserves the right to conduct compliance surveillance of any contractual requirement of this acquisition

F. CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT. This report shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer monthly (unless otherwise agreed upon between the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer’s Representative).

G. REPERFORMANCE OF SERVICES. If any of the services do not conform to contract requirements, the Government will require the Contractor to reperform the services in conformity with contract requirements, at no additional cost to the Government. When the defects in services cannot be corrected due to circumstances, the Government may (1) require the contractor to take necessary action to ensure that future performance conforms to contract requirements and (2) reduce the contract price to reflect the reduced value of the services performed. The Contracting Officer may exercise appropriate contractual remedy should the Contractor fail to promptly take the necessary action to ensure future performance is in conformity with contract requirements.

When apparent non-satisfactory work is identified, the Contracting Officer’s Representative shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) and submit to the Contracting Officer for review, use DD Form 2772. The Contractor shall then be required to respond to the CDR. The Contractor shall explain reasons for substandard performance, how performance will be returned to acceptable levels, and how recurrence of the same or like problems will be prevented. The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's explanation, assess its validity, and determine whether it is acceptable.

The Contractor shall be required to correct/eliminate any deficiencies in services in a timely manner. Notification begins when pertinent documents (e.g., Customer Complaint Record or CDR) are issued to the Contractor. Time of notification and correction of all applicable deficiencies should be entered on all Government documents and retained in the contract file. The Government may execute a deduction in payment for non-compliance when validated by the Contracting Officer.

H. PERFORMANCE RATINGS.

The Government will rate past performance using the following performance standards.

EXCEPTIONAL:
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
VERY GOOD:
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
SATISFACTORY:
Performance meets contractual requirements.
MARGINAL:
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
UNSATISFACTORY:
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

Other performance evaluation factors that will be monitored and documented in the contractor’s performance records but cannot be quantified by numerical measurements:

Contractor providing personnel exceeding the minimum qualification standards, and/or performance above or below the standard, for above factors, will be documented in the Contractor’s Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) for the reporting period.

NOTE: This plan is provided for information purposes only. The QASP is not a part of the solicitation, nor shall it be part of any resulting contract. The Government has the right to change or modify inspection methods at its discretion.

(End of Exhibit 1)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .