W91YTZ24Q0079 Questions and Answers.pdf
PDF 108 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Urinalysis Analyzer and System
- Solicitation number
- W91YTZ24Q0079
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army Medical Command
About this file
This document contains Questions and Answers related to Solicitation Number W91YTZ24Q0079 for an Urinalysis Analyzer and System.
The key details are:
- The government has agreed to change the Analytical Measurement Range (AMR) requirements for RBCs and WBCs to >5,000/uL for RBCs and >10,000/uL for WBCs, as stated in the original solicitation.
- The government confirmed that the requirement for "redundancy" and "two analyzers" refers to one automated urinalysis system that performs both Urine Chemistry and Microscopic testing.
- The government stated that the SF 1449 form is required and has been provided.
- The government will not be granting an extension to the proposal due date of May 31, 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W91YTZ24Q0079 Amendment 2.pdf | ||
| W91YTZ24Q0079 Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| W91YTZ24Q0079.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W91YTZ24Q0079
Questions and Answers
1) Sysmex mistakenly transposed the AMR information for the RBC and WBC when providing to the lab- the AMR ranges should be >5,000/uL for WBC and >10,000/uL for RBCs. Would the government consider changing this requirement to reflect the AMRs provided here for requirements #14 & #15 (pasted below for reference) or finding the true AMR listed above to be acceptable?
SOW: 14. To reduce offline dilutions and ensure accuracy of results, preferred urine particle counting solution should provide an RBC Analytical Measurement Range >
5,000/uL.
15. To reduce offline dilutions and ensure accuracy of results, preferred urine particle counting solution should provide a WBC Analytical Measurement Range >10,000/uL.
A) Yes, the Government considers this change acceptable.
2) SOW Requirement #27 refers to “redundancy” and “two analyzers”. Understanding we have more than one analyzer that makes up an automated system- can the Government please confirm that this requirement is for only 1 (one) automated urinalysis system that performs
Urine Chem & Microscopic testing?
A) Yes, that assumption is correct. It is only one automated urinalysis system.
3) The submission instructions require a SF 1449 and there was not one included with the RFP-can you please advise is this is required and if so, please provide?
A) The form provided is a 1449 Form no additional information is needed.
4) The below language requests the submission be submitted in 3 (three) separate parts but only
2 (two) parts are listed- can you please advise how you would like this submitted?
A) An Amendment will be posted to state two parts
5) Lastly, given the pending items, would the Government please consider an extension to the due date of this response to May 31st?
A) The government will not be giving an extension as the proposal will be due on May
31st 2024.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .