Amendment_W91QVN18R0079-0001.pdf

0011056130

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

A. The purpose of ths amendment is to change under Section M, Factor A, 1. Sub-Factor#1 PRIME CONTRACTOR'S REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION REGISTRATION as show n on next pages.

B. Attache an excell f ile for the convenience of the vendor. Excluded from consideration if vendor fix (edit or delete) the content.

C. all other temrs and conditions remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91QVN18R0079

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Nov-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Dec-2018

CODE

411TH CONTRACTING SUPPORT BRIGADE, KOREA

RCO DAEGU, UNIT #15682

APO AP 96218-5682

UNITED STATES

W90VN9 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W91QVN18R0079

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The Issued By organization below has been added:

411TH CONTRACTING SUPPORT BRIGADE, KOREA

RCO DAEGU, UNIT #15682

APO AP 96218-5682

UNITED STATES

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

Award will be made to the responsible offeror(s) submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable (LPTA) offer(s) that satisfies all terms and conditions of this solicitation. The Government intends to make multiple awards, if it is determined to be most advantageous to the Government. The Government reserves the right to make a technical acceptability determination without any discussions with the offerors. The Government reserves the right to limit the number of the multiple awards in order to insure administrative efficiencies.

B. FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The following evaluation factors and sub-factors will be used to evaluate each proposal: Each non-price factor or sub-factor will be rated as either acceptable or unacceptable. If any of one sub-factor is rated as unacceptable, the overall factor rating is unacceptable and the entire proposal is unacceptable.

Factor A. Technical: Technical acceptability will be based on evaluation of proposals in accordance with the responses received to the criteria outlined in the below.

Sub-factor 1. Required Construction Registration : This sub-factor evaluates Construction Registration. Offeror(s) not possessing the required registration(s), proposing the use of a subcontractor’s registration to meet this requirement, or failing to provide valid copies of their registration(s), will be determined “technically unacceptable” for this technical sub-factor

Sub-factor 2. Contract Management Plan (CMP): This sub-factor evaluates the CMP. Any proposal(s) that does not meet the evaluation approach in Section M will be deemed “technically unacceptable” for this technical sub-factor.

Sub-factor 3. Key Personnel: This sub-factor evaluates Key Personnel who will perform work under the contract. Any proposal(s) that does not meet the required qualification(s) or failing to provide valid copies of the qualification(s) will be determined “technically unacceptable” for this technical sub-factor.

Sub-factor 4. Prime: Contractors Relevant Experience: This sub-factor evaluates Relevant Experience. Any proposal(s) that does not meet the evaluation approach in Section M will be deemed “technically unacceptable” for this technical sub-factor.

Sub-factor 5. Quality Control Plan: This sub-factor evaluates Contractor’s Quality Control Plan.

Any proposal(s) that does not meet the evaluation approach in Section M will be deemed

“technically unacceptable” for this technical sub-factor.

Sub-factor 6. Safety/ Accident Prevention Plan: This sub-factor evaluates Contractor’s SP/APP. Any proposal(s) that does not meet the evaluation approach in Section M will be deemed

“technically unacceptable” for this technical sub-factor.

Factor B. Past Performance

Factor C. Price

C. EVALUATION APPROACH

All proposals will be subject to evaluation by the Source Selection Team (SST). Each proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the RFP.

FACTOR ‘A’: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

1. SUB-FACTOR #1 PRIME CONTRACTOR’S REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION REGISTRATION: In accordance with Laws of South Korea, the prime contractor must possess the Construction Registration for general works of Civil & Architecture (건설업등록증-토목/건축공사업), and specialized works for Electrical

(전기공사업등록증). The prime contractor shall have valid registrations/licenses and shall maintain valid registrations/licenses during the entire performance period of the contract. The Prime Contractor may not substitute their subcontractor’s certificate for this requirement.

2. SUB-FACTOR #2 PRIME CONTRACTOR’S CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN: The Contract Management Plan shall include the offeror’s detailed processes that allow them to manage the contract IAW Statement of Work and drawings. As a minimum, the contract management plan shall include:

a. Contract Management tools to successfully manage multiple task orders.

b. Organization chart for overall management showing the functional relationships and individual team members. As a minimum, chart shall list personnel in a section entitled “Key Personnel” and clearly show lines of authority.

c. The standard for Contract Management Plan submittals is electronic format. Contract Management tools shall be software-based using commercially available software capable of producing MS Office-compatible (Word or Excel) or Portable Document Format (PDF) files and documents. PDF files containing text should be searchable.

3. SUB-FACTOR #3 PRIME CONTRACTOR’S KEY PERSONNEL OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS AND

RESUMES: Offeror shall submit the Certificate of National Pension (국민연금가입자 가입증명서) issued by

National Pension Association and the Certificate of Engineering Career (건설기술자 경력증명서) issued by

Korean Construction Engineers Association (KOCEA-한국건설기술인협회) for all key personnel. In addition, offeror shall submit copies of Project Manager’s (PM) and Contractor Quality Control System Manager’s (CQCSM) valid engineer licenses. The Key Personnel resumes shall include the Project Manager (PM) for this contract, as well as Contract Quality Control System Manager (CQCSM), and Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) as provided below.

a. Project Manager (PM) shall be a licensed engineer (기사) with a minimum of three (3) years relevant experience within the last five (5) years and the latest experience attained within the past six (6) months as of the closing date of this solicitation. The offeror shall provide official Certificate of

Engineering Career (건설기술자 경력증명서) in a PM position issued by Korean Construction

Engineers Association (KOCEA-한국건설기술인협회) to validate at least three (3) years of relevant experience. Relevant experience is defined as experience gained as a Project Manager in responsibility

(현장대리인) for a Construction Contractor performing work similar in nature (repairs or minor construction) to the work that is required under this contract in the SOW. The proposed PM shall have at least more than 2 years length of service in the current firm as of the closing date of this solicitation.

b. Contractor Quality Control System Manager (CQCSM) shall be a licensed engineer

(기사) with a minimum of five (5) years construction experience within the last seven (7) years and the latest experience attained within the past six (6) months as of the closing date of this solicitation on construction similar to this contract. The offeror shall provide official Certificate of Engineering Career (건설기술자 경력증명서) in an equivalent CQCSM position issued by Korean Construction Engineers Association (KOCEA-

한국건설기술인협회) to validate at least five (5) years of relevant experience. Relevant experience is defined as experience gained as a CQCSM in professional field (직무분야:건축 또는 토목, 전문분야:시공 또는 품질관리) for a Construction Contractor performing work similar in nature (repairs or minor construction) to the work that is required under this contract in the SOW. The proposed CQC System Manager shall have at least more than 2 years length of service in the current firm as of the closing date of this solicitation.

c. Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) shall have at least five (5) years of construction industry safety experience within the last seven (7) years or three (3) years within the last seven (7) years if he/she is the licensed

Engineer of Construction Safety (건설안전기사) or Engineer of Industrial Safety (산업안전기사). The latest experience must be attained within the past 6 months as of the closing date of this solicitation. The offeror shall provide official Certificate of Engineering Career (건설기술자 경력증명서) in an equivalent SSHO position issued by Korean Construction Engineers Association (KOCEA-한국건설기술인협회) to validate their experience.

Relevant experience is defined as experience gained as a SSHO in professional field (직무분야:안전관리, 전문분야:건설안전) for a Construction Contractor performing work similar in nature (repairs or minor construction) to the work that is required under this contract in the SOW. The proposed SSHO shall have at least more than 2 years length of service in the current firm as of the closing date of this solicitation.

All resumes shall be no more than two pages per individual and shall be submitted in the following format:

i. Name

ii. Education

iii. Years with the firm

ix. Experience of relevant projects: (Project title, location, dollar value, year worked on the project, and duties/function on the project)

4. SUB-FACTOR #4 PRIME CONTRACTOR’S RELEVANT EXPERIENCE: The offeror must possess and shall submit with their proposal evidence of at least three (3) years prior experience within the last seven (7) years in similar or same in scope, magnitude, and complexity as specified in the solicitation. Content listing for relevant experience:

a. Company Information:

(1) Category of Business

(2) Company Name

(3) Licenses and Certificates

(4) The Registration Number of Contractor

(5) Company Achievements and Awards Recognition

b. Past Contracts:

(1) Contract number

(2) Total dollar value

(3) Contract award date

(4) Procuring agency

(5) Title of contract

(6) Program Manager (name, address, and telephone number)

(7) Description of program/product

(8) Contracting Officer (name, address, e-mail address and telephone number)

(9) Period of performance

(10) Type of contract

(11) A synopsis of relevant performance, segregated by areas, which occurred under each contract

5. SUB-FACTOR #5 PRIME CONTRACTOR’S QUALITY CONTROL PLAN (CQC): The CQC plan shall include the offeror’s detailed CQC plans that incorporate O&MA section numbers 01 45 00.00 10 paragraph 3.2. As a minimum, the Contractor’s CQC plan shall include:

a. A description of the quality control organization, including a chart showing lines of authority.

b. Inspections procedures (to include controls, verification, checks, reviews and examinations) for each specific feature of work to include the inspection name, control phase, specification paragraph requiring the inspection or drawing number, submittal number, feature of work to be inspected, inspection frequency, and person responsible for each inspection.

c. Procedures for tracking construction deficiencies and schedule delays from identification through acceptable corrective action. Establish verification procedures that identified deficiencies have been corrected.

6. SUB-FACTOR #6 PRIME CONTRACTOR’S SAFETY/ACCIDENT PREVENTION PLAN (SP/APP):

The SP/APP shall include the offeror’s detailed SP/APP that incorporate section number 01 35 26 paragraph 1.6 of the O&MA Specifications and Appendix A of the USACE EM 385-1-1.

a. A description of the safety organization, including a chart showing lines of authority.

b. A description of the safety and health inspections during periods of work activity. Type of inspection (Daily, Weekly, Monthly), who will conduct the inspections, when inspections will be conducted. A description of the procedures for documenting the safety and health inspections.

c. A description of the safety deficiency tracking, and follow-up procedures. Establish verification procedures that identified safety deficiencies have been corrected.

d. A description of the contractor’s Risk Management Process. The plan shall provide project-specific hazards and controls by an Activity Hazard Analysis in accordance with USACE EM 385-1-1 paragraph 01.A.13.

Technical Assessment Ratings Rating Definition Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the requirements of the solicitation.

FACTOR ‘B’: PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR

1. Past Performance Factor. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the solicitation requirements. This factor will be evaluated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the ratings in the table below. Past Performance will be evaluated based upon offeror’s customer’s satisfaction on same or similar projects within the last 3 years. In determining the acceptability, each offeror shall be required to submit Past Performance Information within the last three (3) years in accordance to the Section L, Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors. The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance from any reasonable source available, including Government databases in order to evaluate past performance.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

* Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)).

Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. “Unknown” will be considered “acceptable.”

FACTOR ‘C’: PRICE

1. Price Factor.

a. Price analysis will be performed to determine the extent to which the price is reasonable and complete IAW FAR 15.404, Proposal analysis. A proposal that is determined to have unbalanced pricing will be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government; therefore, the proposal will not be considered for award.

b. Price is not rated. The Government will review the price proposal to determine the extent to which it is reasonable and consistent with the technical proposal.

c. As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217- 8 – Option to Extend Services) by adding one-half of the Offeror’s final option period price to the Offeror’s total price. Thus, the Offeror’s total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period, 1st option, 2nd option, 3rd option, 4th option, and one half of the 4th option. Offerors are required only to price the base and four (4) options. Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential one-half year extension of services period.

(End of Summary of Changes)