vendor questions.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
PKSOI DSS Framework
Solicitation number
W91QF023Q2002
Issued by

About this file

This document contains questions and answers related to a solicitation for research and writing services to support the Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute (PKSOI). The single award contract requires the selected individual to work on-site at Carlisle Barracks in Pennsylvania to conduct research, analysis, and writing. Deliverables will be determined annually with similar work expected across option years. Travel is anticipated several times per year to combatant commands and agencies in the local area. A secret clearance is required and will be sponsored. The contract is set aside for small businesses with a size standard of $24.5 million. It will utilize a full tradeoff evaluation of technical qualifications and price to select the awardee. No incumbent exists and the previous effort was not comparable in scope. The response date is not extended.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
212-1 and 212-2 FULL TRADEOFF.docx DOCX document
W91QF0232002 SOL AMENDED.pdf PDF
vendor questions.docx DOCX document
Synopsis.docx DOCX document
W91QF023Q2002 Solicitation.pdf PDF
PWS PKSOI DSS Framework FY23-FY27 (3).docx DOCX document
Synopsis.docx DOCX document
CLIN STRUCTURE.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1. If two instructors are submitted, will the best credentials of the two be evaluated, the lowest credentials, or some average of the two? How will this be evaluated?

This contract is not for instructors. It is for a single research/writer. Evaluation will be based on resume credentials submitted in proposals, and may (if possible) include interviews of candidates.

2. The NAICS listed in the Synopsis is 611710, while in the PWS it is 541611. Which is correct or are both acceptable?

Both are acceptable.

3. The Small Business set aside standard is $16,500,000.00 in the Synopsis, but $24,500,000 in the PWS. What is the correct set aside standard?

$24,500,000 is for both NAICS. Typo on Synpsis, will correct.

4. Who is the incumbent, what is the past contract number, how much was the contract for, and how long did it last?

There is not an incumbent. There was a similar contract executed in 2022 filled by C. F. Day with two-person research writer teams working for 6 months from remote locations. This new contract requires on site (Carlisle Barracks) work with access to SIPR/SVTC.

5. Is any teaching or teaching support to the Army War College or Command and General Staff College envisioned in this contract? (PWS C-1.1.3) This is not a teaching position or teaching support.

6. Since a security clearance is required, will one or are all members of the winning team be expected to hold one? Will PKSOI sponsor needed clearances for this contract? (PWS C-6.5) Yes. The individual fulfilling this contract will have to possess a clearance. PKSOI will sponsor.

7. Will the government provide a CAC, facility access card, NIPRNet account, and SIPRNet account (PWS C-6.5)?

Yes. Government will provide CAC, and NIPR and SIPR accounts/access.

8. Since PKSOI is DOD lead for Joint Peace and Stability Operations appointed by the Secretary of Defense, does previous research, writing, and teaching for PKSOI count towards PWS C-6.4.2 requirement to be assigned or support the Joint Staff or OSD?

Likely, but will need to see the nature of the work done for PKSOI. Some of our previous contract work may have had little or no interactions with JS or OSD, such as training support.

9. For unclassified information level, does PKSOI expect the winning team to comply with DOD’s Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 1 or Level 2 controls? (PWS C-6.5.8)

9a. If Level 2, will PKSOI issue CMMC Level 2 compliant laptops to contractors and allow use of government cloud storage facilities as part of the contract, or will the contractors be expected to furnish their own compliant equipment (with subsequent mark up to the government to comply)?

This portion of the PWS is only stating Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Which is derived from NIST SP 800-171 is a NIST Special Publication that provides recommended requirements for protecting the confidentiality of controlled unclassified information (CUI). CUI Training is mandatory for all personnel working on the contract. CMMC Level 1 and Level 2 is not required.

10. How often, for what duration, and to what locations is travel expected in this contract? (C-6.3) Travel is likely several times a year to Combatant Commands, and agencies/departments in the MDW area.

11. PWS C-4.1 seems to describe products that will be delivered within a year. What is the plan for work in the option years? What type of travel, duration, and locations are anticipated in the option years?

Travel and deliverables for option years will be determined prior to submission for execution of each option years. Contractor can plan that travel and deliverables will be similar to base year.

12. PWS C-6.1 states "The Contractor shall perform majority of work at Upton Hall and Collins Hall, Carlisle Barracks, PA. Telework will be used by exception and with prior written approval from the Director, PKSOI and coordination with the COR". However, PWS C-6.5.10 states that "Contractor will work from their normal facilities." Does this mean that the contractor can expect to work remotely the majority of contract duration, aside from meetings, travel, etc. as long as there is access to a certified SCIF and to SIPRNet for secure VTCs?

The individual fulfilling this contract will work daily at Carlisle Barracks. Telework will be by-exception only. Unfortunately, we are unable to work SIPRNet and SVTC access at other locations outside of Carlisle Barracks. We worked this for six months on the last iteration of this contract, and were never able to get sponsorship for classified access.

Would the Government consider extending the solicitation due date?

We cannot due to time constraints

Would the government consider a Direct Award through the 8(a) Small Business Program, as the solicitation meets the Direct Award threshold?

No, we are looking for competition within Small Business Set Aside.

Who is the Incumbent?

None, new requirement. Previous contract was not similar in scope of the PWS.

There is no section L or M within the solicitation. Will the Government provide further Instructions to Offerors beyond the provided FAR Clauses?

FAR 52.212-1 & 52.212-2 is only needed for Full Trade Off requirements.

What is the page limit for this RFQ?

Please keep as minimal as possible per the instructions in FAR 52.212-1 & 52.212-2

To level the playing field, will the Government please provide LCATS, LOE, or FTE information?

LCAT Senoir Consulting Services / Senoir Admin Support. Subject Matter Experts considered. Will be using Wage Determination 2015-4225.

Can the Incumbent compete for this Solicitation?

No incumbent.

Can the Government Provide Solicitation Documents for similar previous procurements with the Customer?

New requirement. The previous contract is not similar in scope of the PWS.

Will the Government please confirm that Offerors are not required to submit Past Performance information, a Past Performance Volume, or any attachments regarding Past Performance?

Past Performance of the Quoter is required per Volume 2 Factor 2. See FAR 52.212-1 & 52.212-2

Does the Government require the Offeror to have a Facility Clearance level? If so, what level is required?

No, just the candidate needs a secret clearance and PKSIO will sponsor.

Can the Government clarify if they want Offerors to make a statement in our proposal that Representations and Certifications have been verified in Sam.gov, submit a copy of the Representations and Certifications, or complete Section K of the Solicitation?

We will verify SAM.gov reps/certs. Provide Cage/UEI with SOL. Complete Section K.

Is this a Performance Based contract?

No.

Can the file submission be in pdf format?

PDF is acceptable via instructions in attachment FAR 52.212-1 & 52.212-2.

What is the Government using as a man year? We know that a Government man year equates to 2080. If you subtract out the 88 hours for holidays and two weeks of PTO, this will leave a contractor man year of 1912. For pricing purposes, is this the number that Offerors should use when developing their pricing? This will help to ensure a level playing field.

1800hr man year is what the Government is using.

Would the Government consider establishing an escalation rate for all Offerors to adhere to?

Government estimated 1.02%

Are Offerors required to Submit CPARS or Past Performance Questionnaires?

No.

Would the Government consider extending the due date for submitting Questions as the Government has not provided the Pricing Worksheet in time for contractor review?

No. Due to time constraints with Period of Performance start date.

Will the Government confirm it will be using a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) evaluation method?

This is a Full Trade Off evaluation as the attachment 52.212-1 & 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .